Fox the Fox 📯 (anubis2406.bsky.social)

innn.it/afdverbot Lesen, verstehen, unterzeichnen. #AfDVerbot jetzt! #AfDVerbotSofort #AfDzerstoertDeutschland #AfDsindFaschisten #fckafd

@kulliscouting Happy Birthday Kulli! Lebenslang 💚🤍

Danke an meinen Onkel auf jeden Fall

@RWittenbrink @threadreaderapp unroll

Positiver Effekt der COVID-19-Impfung auf die Verringerung des Lungengefäß- und Atemwegsvolumens bei Patienten mit Long-COVID »Diese Studie zeigt erstmals, dass Patienten mit Long COVID, die trotz normaler Lungenfunktionswerte und unauffälliger konventioneller …

@kulliscouting Tolle Arbeit, die du mit den Fans teilst. Du sprachst in einem Nebensatz davon, dass du selbst großer Fan von xG bist. Kannst du das in einer zukünftigen Folge evtl. etwas erläutern? Also warum, was ziehst du für Schlüsse aus xG, usw. Kenne viele Leute, die xG für Stuss halten.

„Kulli‘s Korner“ - Folge 2 In der gerade veröffentlichten Folge spreche ich über meine ersten Eindrücke zur Vorbereitung des SV Werder. Was war positiv, was negativ… Das versuche ich in der Folge zu erläutern. Gibt mir gerne ein Feedback🥰 open.spotify.com/episode/51l2St…

@Ruxiiii4 @threadreaderapp unroll

Talking about England's exit of the World Cup. Thomas Tuchel's game plan against Argentina, his substitutions, the use of high-tempo players and England's footballing DNA. There has been a lot of discussion about England's game and Thomas Tuchel. I have rewatched the game and came to some important conclusions. First, let's talk about Tuchel's pressing plan. It wasn't the most aggressive, and I feel it was quite conservative, but it was well organized. England left Argentina's fullbacks free while pressing with the wingers, Gordon and Rogers, from the outside in to press Argentina's centre-backs. Bellingham and Kane stayed centrally and deeper with Argentina's midfielders, Enzo and Paredes. Tuchel wanted to have more players centrally than Argentina, for example by keeping Anderson as an extra player in the middle to deal with Messi if he decided to drop deep to organize play. Argentina were able to play through third-man combinations inside to find the free fullback quite easily. Once Argentina played to the left fullback, James, at right-back, would push up to press, while Stones shifted across to cover Julián Álvarez. England controlled that side well and closed Argentina down many times. Argentina didn't have any threat in behind, so England could press aggressively. The fullback wasn't going to play in behind because there was no attacking threat, meaning Tagliafico could only play centrally. That also suited England because their plan was to outnumber Argentina in central areas. But on Argentina's right side, the story was different. The inclusion of Simeone in the starting line-up added attacking threat to Argentina. Whenever the right fullback received the ball, Simeone would make a run in behind, so Spence couldn't really jump out and press like James was doing on the other side. Tuchel had to adjust after the hydration break if he wanted to make the press more aggressive and more logical. So he did. Gordon was now marking the right fullback instead of stepping inside towards the centre-back, Bellingham started pressing Cuti Romero, and left Enzo behind him for Anderson to pick up. It became a much more aggressive press, man-to-man at times. If Gordon, will go and press Cuti, then Bellingham will cover out wide for Gordon. But Spence will never jump out of position. Those were England's best moments. They started winning duels and playing to their strengths. They are physically superior to Argentina, and Argentina struggle when you press them high aggressively. They don't have a real reference point for playing direct, and only Simeone was able to provide threat in behind. Still, I feel England could have caused Argentina even more problems if they had been a little more aggressive with their press. But it's also fair to talk about the adjustment Tuchel made during the game because it worked well. If you look at the stats, you can see how many more duels England started to win and how Argentina began to attack much less and struggle much more. Again, my opinion on England with the ball is that, at times, they are too direct. I like the idea of allowing Kane to drop and letting Gordon and Rogers attack the space in behind. It worked at times, like for the goal. Kane dropped deep, released Rogers with a run in behind, Rice won the second ball, found Rogers, and Rogers crossed for Gordon. That was Tuchel's attacking idea, and England scored from it, so that's only fair to acknowledge. I think England lacked a player like Saka to slow down the tempo of the game, keep the ball under pressure, and allow the team to enjoy longer spells of possession. There are too many players who, whenever they receive or recover the ball, immediately look to accelerate, sometimes making poor decisions, which ends up costing England possession far too often. England have enough players who can attack in behind and be dangerous, so they can certainly afford to sacrifice one of them in order to have more control. Let’s talk now about what happened after the goal, step by step. When England scored, they continued to press aggressively. In fact, they had a couple of moments where they came very close to creating chances by winning the ball high up the pitch. Actually, in one of those situations, they were caught in transition because they pressed so aggressively. That was the moment when Spence saved a goal with an incredible tackle. I don’t buy the idea that England retreated after scoring because it simply isn’t true. In fact, England defended quite well in their 4-4-2 for the first 10 minutes after the goal. Argentina didn’t create anything. But it’s true that England were no longer able to keep the ball. They tried to play from the back, but some of their players made poor decisions. If that had been Tuchel’s instruction, England would have gone long from the very moment they scored. They didn’t. Pickford tried to play short when Argentina pressed man-to-man, which was the ideal moment to go long. Then Pickford played long when Kane was completely free in the middle of the pitch because Argentina had adopted a more conservative press. It’s true that it’s very difficult to play under pressure in a game like this, but Argentina and Spain are able to make good decisions on the ball even under intense pressure. The game changed in the 65th minute when Nico González came on for Paredes. Argentina started committing many more players forward, with both fullbacks pushing high, making it very difficult for England’s 4-4-2, which eventually ended up pinned back inside its own box. That’s when Tuchel decided to bring on Konsa, adding another centre-back to protect the back line. Again, I don’t think bringing on Konsa was a bad decision. How many times has Scaloni introduced Otamendi to defend in a back five? The problem wasn’t using a back five. For me, there were two problems, and I’ll explain them. First, England switched to a back five but defended in a 5-3-2 instead of a 5-4-1. The 5-3-2 has a structural weakness that Messi knows how to exploit: moving into wide areas to deliver crosses. Three midfielders simply have too much width to cover. Messi punished Egypt in the same way because they also defended in a 6-3-1, with only three midfielders covering the width of the pitch. Messi started delivering crosses from those wide areas, and later De Paul did the same. Argentina then began creating almost all of their chances through crosses from the right side. Bellingham should have dropped into the midfield line to help England defend in a 5-4-1. The second problem was that England lost all of their counter-attacking threat. Gordon looked tired, but in that game context he could still have offered much more than Rogers. After Gordon went off, England had no threat in behind. Rogers was defending as one of the midfielders in a 5-3-2, having to cover a huge amount of ground. With only three midfielders, you can’t expect him to make those defensive runs and still have the energy to lead counter-attacks. It also made little sense to leave Kane on the field without runners around him. In that game context, there wasn’t much he could do. Tuchel realised the mistake a few minutes later. He brought on O’Reilly for Rice and moved Bellingham into midfield. England then defended in a 5-4-1 and immediately looked better defensively. But another problem appeared, and I don’t think this one was Tuchel’s fault. With the 5-4-1, England’s wide centre-backs were reluctant to move out of the box. As a result, England’s midfielders had to track the half-space runs for them. So although Tuchel wanted England to defend in a 5-4-1, they actually ended up defending in a 6-3-1. The same problem remained: too much width for three midfielders to cover. Yes, you protect the box better because all three centre-backs stay inside it, but you also allow easy crosses from wide areas. I always remember what Cruyff said about this: the best way to defend crosses is not to allow them in the first place. In conclusion, I think it would have been better to defend in a 5-4-1 while keeping attacking threat on the wings. In a 5-4-1, the defensive role of the wingers isn’t as demanding, while they can still provide a huge threat when Argentina commit so many players forward. Egypt were a good example of how much you can hurt Argentina in transition if you keep fast players up front. Players like Rashford or Madueke could have come on. Kane is capable of releasing them with passes into the space behind. Those two players aren’t the most reliable defensively, but in a 5-4-1 their defensive responsibilities are much smaller. Still, Tuchel clearly didn’t think it was worth bringing them on because he didn’t trust them defensively. The other issue is that England produce very few press-resistant players. Instead, they produce many more high-tempo players who like to play vertically and attack quickly but struggle to receive under pressure, slow the game down, and give the team continuity in possession. Some of the players who can do that (Saka, Mainoo, Palmer...) weren’t used. We can’t expect England to play with too many players of that profile, but I’m sure they would have improved by having at least one of them on the pitch instead of another high-tempo player. In the end, this is also about the type of players you choose. Argentina and Spain have far more press-resistant players in their starting line-ups, players who can deceive opponents, keep the ball after recovering possession, and help the team transition from defending in a low block to establishing sustained possession. Pedri, Rodri, Fabián, Dani Olmo or Enzo Fernández, Mac Allister, Messi and Julián Álvarez are all examples. There is also a cultural aspect to this. In England, if you are winning with 15 minutes to go, everyone tells you to kick the ball out of the stadium. It’s a short-term solution because, within a few seconds, the ball is back near your own box. It isn’t logical, but many coaches still ask their players to do it. So you can’t blame English players for something that is rooted in their football culture, they have been taught this since they were young. The same applies to England producing more high-tempo, vertical players instead of lower-tempo players with better decision-making. In England, those second types of players have a much more difficult pathway to becoming professionals than the first. It’s unfair to blame only Tuchel for all of England’s structural issues. He made some mistakes, but he also got some things right. It’s easy to say afterwards what he could have done differently, but he had to make decisions in a matter of seconds and under immense pressure. With all that said, I don’t think England were that far away from being genuine title contenders.

@WorumPodcast @hands__of__god Muss man euch folgen, liken und kommentieren oder bei hands of god?

@kulliscouting Naja wenn die EK etwas effektiver vor dem Tor gewesen wäre, hätte es gut 0-2 oder 1-3 stehen können. Da hilft dir der Nagelsmann Ball auch nicht mehr. Zwischenzeitlich hat die EK die Deutschen vorn und hinten hergespielt.

Elfenbeinküste hat Frankreich besiegt, die Quali ohne Gegentor bestanden und eine goldene Generation, die sich gerade entwickelt… Wieso sind wir immer so negativ eingestellt, außerhalb Deutschland werden wir für Nagelsmann Ball abgefeiert

@kulliscouting @Plettigoal @threadreaderapp unroll

Laut @Plettigoal hat Werder Interesse an einer Verpflichtung von Lasse Günther. Der Linksverteidiger stieg zuletzt mit der SV Elversberg in die Bundesliga auf und könnte nun den Schritt an die Weser machen. Was ihn ausmacht und eine Einschätzung im Thread:

@wissensarbeiter @NurderK Wo ging es um Vermögen? Der MdB spendet einen Großteil seines Einkommens. Auf diesen Post kam deine Antwort. Nach wie vor ist der Vergleich zur Körpergröße absolut irrelevant, weil kein vernunftbegabter Mensch einen Ausgleich dafür fordert. 🤷

@anubis2406 @NurderK Hier ging es um Vermögen nicht Einkommen. Und Vermögen ist, wenn man es erbt, schon vergleichbar mit u.a. der Körpergrösse, für die man auch nichts kann.

Die Linke diskutiert über den Gehaltsdeckel ihrer Abgeordneten. Die Vermögensungleichheit erreicht Rekordwerte. Manchmal wirkt es, als würde man Politik mit Selbsterziehung verwechseln.

@wissensarbeiter @NurderK Warum sollte man Körpergröße mit Einkommen vergleichen? Das 1. ist minimal zu beeinflussen, das 2. sehr wohl. Ganz davon abgesehen, dass es nichts zur Debatte beiträgt oder relevant ist. Mit solchen Aussagen über 50 Personen Verantwortung zu tragen ist auch "interessant".

@NurderK Was sagt die Linke eigentlich zur Ungleichheit bzgl. Körpergrösse? Gibt es da schon Vorschläge, wie man hier Gleichheit herstellen möchte?

@xxSCHEISSEGALxx @Plettigoal Unter welchem Stein hast du denn die letzten 30+ Jahre gelebt?

@Plettigoal Wie kann es eigentlich sein, dass Vereine mit Spielern, die unter Vertrag stehen, verhandeln können?

🚨📞 Jens Stage has informed Werder Bremen internally that he wants to join TSG Hoffenheim. A verbal agreement on a contract until 2030 is already in place as revealed. The problem: Bremen and Hoffenheim have not been in direct contact for 4-5 days. Bremen bosses are not picking up the phone. As a result, Bremen have not set a price and Hoffenheim are currently unable to submit an offer. @SkySportDE 🇩🇰

@stepsenmccool Wieso eigentlich 58 Euro? Die Zeiten sind doch längst vorbei, es kostet 63 Euro.

13,5 Millionen Wählern und Wählerinnen gleichzeitig den Mittelfinger zeigen? CDU/CSU: Jaaaa! Soll das eigentlich irgendeine Art von dämlicher Challenge sein, eure Zustimmungswerte auf Null zu drücken?

@maxast @llestutSVWeh warum eine App bauen? Hat die Ard schon am Start. ard-text.de/mobil/100

@llestutSVWeh Deshalb hab ich ne App gebaut mit der ich wie früher min 90min draufglotzen kann 😂 apps.apple.com/de/app/teletex…

Ich weiß noch wie ich da als kind 90 min draufgeglotzt habe kannste mit der heutigen tiktok generation nicht mehr machen

@HousebotGuy @threadreaderapp unroll

Netanyahu died on March 8th, 2026. Yair, his son who posts 24/7, took an exact 7 day break on X from 3/8 to 3/15. That lines up precisely with the Jewish Shiva mourning period. President Trump looked visibly shaken on 3/8. Now they are striking oil fields and hitting civilian infrastructure in response. They wouldn’t do that unless something serious happened, like a major assassination. That also lines up with the strange military council absences and event cancellations. Every video you are seeing of him after 3/8 is AI assisted.

@BWG_Amt @grok @threadreaderapp unroll

Hey @grok roaste den Hamburger SV vulgär ohne ein Blatt vor den Mund zu nehmen

@IrisRoder42813 @threadreaderapp unroll

Nun soll nachgewiesen worden sein, dass diese aus dem Bestand der Polizei Berlin stammt. nd-aktuell.de/artikel/119800…

Polizeikugel im Briefkasten: ▶️ Morddrohung gegen Berliner Beamten April 2025. Als der Berliner Polizeihauptkommissar Oliver von Dobrowolski seine private Post öffnet, findet er eine Morddrohung. In dem Brief wird er als »Kollegenschwein« bezeichnet, wie von Dobrowolski

@Eintracht @BILD_Eintracht Dann sollte Eintracht klar machen, dass es gegen die Bild geht. Wer die Fragen ins Rollen bringt ist egal. Wichtig ist dass Inhalt & Form stimmen. Auf Dick Pics gehen um die Frage zu diskreditieren ist - Überraschung! - auf dem Niveau das die Eintracht kritisiert. 🤡 Move

Liebe @BILD_Eintracht, lasst uns doch darauf einigen, dass sich Fragen an unseren Cheftrainer in Pressekonferenzen nicht auf Meinungen aus einem Podcast stützen sollten, in dem von einem der beiden Hosts bereits der Pe*** durchs Internet gegeistert ist. Alles andere wäre doch unseriös. Danke.

@dcideGer Guck einfach weiter Twitter P0rñ. Haste vielleicht mehr Ahnung von. 🤦

@DIW_Berlin @threadreaderapp unroll

Auch wenn der Ausbau von Wind- und Solarenergie zuletzt Fortschritte machte und der Trend positiv ist, droht Deutschland die gesetzlich festgelegten 2030er-Ausbauziele für Erneuerbare Energien zu verfehlen.🧵(1/9) 🔗Zum DIW-Energiewende-Monitor: diw.de/de/diw_01.c.99…

@NixForSix @loooooca 🤣

-DRAKE MAYE STINKER IN SUPERBOWL -PATRIOTS EXPOSED AS SCHEDULE MERCHANTS -PATS FANS WHO CHEERED NIX INJURY CRYING ALL NIGHT THIS WAS A GENERATIONAL HATE WATCH 😂🫵🏼

@loooooca Das Leben ist so random. Da hätte nur ein Ref ein holding callen müssen. Wir haben BO, gute Coaches. Mit paar add-ons fürs Team greifen wir wieder an. Ich kann so abschließen mit der Saison. Karma wollte uns nicht, aber die Pats noch weniger. Das lässt mich richtig schlafen.

@anubis2406 Es hätte so insane sein können 😭

Fml wir hätten den Seahawks mehr als das geboten - da bin ich mir relativ sicher