James Locke

612 posts

James Locke

James Locke

@arctechinc

Katılım Ağustos 2025
12 Takip Edilen83 Takipçiler
James Locke
James Locke@arctechinc·
Tomorrow we turn in our last Model S. We'll never own another one. 2015 85D. 2017 100D. 2022 LR. Three generations, 11 years. End of an era.
James Locke tweet media
English
3
0
4
29
James Locke retweetledi
Governor Tim Walz
Governor Tim Walz@GovTimWalz·
The Trump Administration attempted to make an example of Minnesota during Operation Metro Surge. Instead, Minnesotans set an example for the rest of the country that decency and compassion will always triumph over fear and division.
FOX 9@FOX9

The people of the Twin Cities will be honored with the John F. Kennedy Profile in Courage Award for their stand against federal immigration enforcement. fox9.com/news/ice-surge…

English
755
782
3.6K
65.7K
James Locke retweetledi
Amy Klobuchar
Amy Klobuchar@amyklobuchar·
Today I met with members of the Canadian Parliament to discuss trade, security, tourism, and more. Canada is our friend and ally and I will always work to maintain our strong relationship. 🇺🇸 🇨🇦
English
573
395
3.8K
90.6K
James Locke retweetledi
Miss Jilianne
Miss Jilianne@MissJilianne·
Tesla Full Self-Driving makes mistakes, that’s why it requires human supervision. Anyone who tells you it’s perfectly safe, isn’t being truthful to you.
English
15
7
45
1.4K
Miss Jilianne
Miss Jilianne@MissJilianne·
FSD should have never engaged in this condition.
Painkiller@illegalimigrent

Accident on #FSD. Sure I am responsible as I was looking at the screen. But how is FSD driving with almost no visibility, remember human visibility has been fine without any issues. I don't even think I had a camera visibility alert or the system was asking to pay attention.

English
3
0
14
877
James Locke
James Locke@arctechinc·
@justin_horn The ones who believed in the mission left or got pushed out. What remains is a fan club, not a community. Loyalty to the mission got replaced by loyalty to one person.
English
2
0
5
156
Justin
Justin@justin_horn·
I’m going on record as of March 2026, the “Tesla community” is dead. The loudest voices are some OG shills that have blocked me and a bunch of new $TSLA lemmings.
English
22
3
68
3.1K
James Locke retweetledi
Amity
Amity@amitylee13·
U.S. Senate.
Amity tweet media
English
135
1.7K
10.1K
61.4K
James Locke retweetledi
PBS News
PBS News@NewsHour·
"Congress is not asserting its authority because Congress is run by Republicans, and right now Republicans view themselves as employees of Donald Trump," Sen. Chris Murphy tells @GeoffRBennett. "Not a single open hearing on a war that is lighting the world on fire."
English
32
951
3.2K
38K
James Locke retweetledi
Cybertruck
Cybertruck@cybertruck·
Cybertruck is the best Tesla
English
572
354
5.1K
275.3K
James Locke retweetledi
Fred Lambert
Fred Lambert@FredLambert·
Tesla fans using the “4-second disengagement” as a gotcha are missing the forest for the trees. Yes, the driver was technically in control of the vehicle at the moment of impact. But she was in control because FSD was already failing by driving too fast ahead of this sharp turn — it was heading straight into a concrete barrier at highway speed with no sign of correcting. Everyone who has frequently used FSD or Autopilot and paints this 4-second disengagement as a “gotcha” moment is being disengenous, and that includes Elon Musk. I have tens of thousands of miles on FSD, and I’ve experienced the system coming too fast into a turn at least half a dozen times. We’ve said this before and we’ll keep saying it: the problem with FSD isn’t what happens when the driver is paying attention and the system works. The problem is what happens when the system gives you every reason to trust it, and then suddenly doesn’t work. The driver has to recognize the failure, assess the situation, decide on a correction, and physically execute it, all in less time than the system needs to create the danger. Musk and Tesla’s propagandists can point to the logs all they want. The video shows what actually matters: FSD approaching a standard highway curve at full speed with zero indication it was going to navigate it. That’s the failure. Everything that happened after, including the panicked disengagement, is a consequence of that failure. The framing that this was “manual driving, not FSD” is technically true for the final 4 seconds and deeply dishonest about the full sequence of events. It’s exactly the kind of liability shell game that courts are increasingly rejecting, as that $243 million verdict makes clear. Tesla created the system, sold it as “Full Self-Driving,” and profits from the ambiguity. At some point, it has to own the consequences.
Electrek.co@ElectrekCo

Tesla says FSD was off before Cybertruck crash — but the video tells a different story electrek.co/2026/03/18/tes… by @fredlambert

English
210
331
3.5K
239.4K
James Locke
James Locke@arctechinc·
You can't build a system that trains complacency and then blame the driver when complacency happens. When FSD works, Tesla takes credit. When it fails, the driver takes blame. That's not safety. That's liability theater.
English
0
0
1
12
James Locke
James Locke@arctechinc·
This week a Cybertruck on FSD hit an overpass at highway speed. The driver disengaged 4 seconds before impact. Musk tweeted that as proof of driver fault. The science says 4 seconds is not enough time to recover from a failure you didn't create.
English
1
0
1
11
James Locke
James Locke@arctechinc·
Tesla actively loosened FSD driver monitoring so you can text behind the wheel. Musk confirmed it on X. The system trains you to stop paying attention. Then when FSD fails, Tesla pulls the logs and fans call it "driver error."
English
1
0
1
31