@WallStreetApes Can someone explain the reasoning for having an *upper* limit on fish size?
When I used to fish as a kid, we had to throw the small ones back, so they had every chance to reproduce and keep fish stocks abundant. Not the big ones.
American is given a misdemeanor because he caught a fish that was over 16 inches
The fish and game warden even called in backup police for this serious incident
You are only allowed to have 1 fish over 16 inches at this location, so the officer measures each of his fish to ensure he’s in compliance, then gives him a misdemeanor
Our founding fathers never meant for this level of Government intrusion in our lives
In places like Florida for example, there are bad limits and size limits. Failure to follow these laws can land a misdemeanor, jail time and a fine
So, we can arrest Andrew and Tristan Tate but not one person in the Epstein files?
We can't arrest Anthony Fauci?
We can't arrest Obama for his Whitehouse hotdog party?
We can't arrest Hillary Clinton for frazzledrip?
We can't arrest Anthony Weiner for his laptop?
We can't arrest Tim Walz for fraud?
We can't arrest people for stealing an election?
We can't arrest Benjamin Netanyahu for committing genocide?
Got it!!
@HemmerleinLee Nothin wrong with that! Hard to beat those old welders. At the ranch that’s what I use, or an old gas powered Lincoln. In the shop I use inverter machines, smaller and lighter. If I need to burn up a lot of rod though, the boxes older than me with no name is my choice 👍
My son and I got a good start on his bumper and grill guard. We still have a bit more welded to complete, but with a coat of paint it shouldn't look too bad.
@HemmerleinLee I figure if I buy one, I’m going to TIG it 🤣. I’m a glutton for punishment lol.
I hesitate to put one in my Ram due to the intercooler being down low. A winch bumper will block airflow. So I’m runnin OEM for now till I figure out what to do.
Sitting in my bed playing Hogwarts Legacy on my switch late last night and I felt something. Figured it was a bug bite, it was like a little firm and itchy. Then woke up with it looking like this. 😑
Good Sunday morning!!
No you’re not seeing double or some weird cross post shenanigans
Did you guys know I have a twin brother? We talk about my sister SheJ all the time but I also have a twin who I met here a few months ago, who shares the same handle as me, except he has (esq) which I think means he’s an attorney. Anyway @Buoyand_man is a nice guy and a good one to follow here! Us CJs are the best and we support each other! 🙂✌️
@hhhtteeee@Mrgunsngear “there is no mechanism in Flock to share law enforcement data outside of CJIS certified entities.”
🤣 oh really? Flock Cloud is the only mechanism they need to share that data with anyone they choose.
@Mrgunsngear What are you getting out of such a blatant lie. (credit card companies, cell phone companies, retailers, foreign governments did not access the data there is no mechanism in Flock to share law enforcement data outside of CJIS certified entities.
A FOIA request revealed that, in just one town, 3rd parties (credit card companies, cell phone companies, alphabet agencies, retailers, foreign governments, etc...) accessed camera data more than 500,000 times in a 9 week period.
"Flock Safety could not guarantee that it's not sharing information with federal agencies." No shit.
Several municipalities in CT are "turning off" their Flock cameras in response to what one FOIA request revealed. The problem - the towns don't control/own the cameras nor the data they collect so they can't turn them off. They can instruct their employees to not access them but Flock, a private company funded *almost exclusively* (outside of people like Marc Andreessen & his ilk) by taxpayer dollars, owns the devices and the data.
Plan accordingly...
#rural#CT#police#crime#PoliceState#4thAmendment#14thAmendment#CivilRights#ALPR#cops#stalking#women#windsor#flock#SurveillanceState
@Mrgunsngear Don’t care. You don’t have a right to privacy in public. You willingly give up your data including location using your phone. You knowingly grant advertisers use to your data.
She settled out of court with Lyft when she sued them for discrimination when a driver refused to give her a ride because of concern for his tires….
True story.
No joke.
@camhigby The very same people that are against Flock cameras have purchased and installed Ring doorbells. An even more private surveillance system in their own house. That's the type of ignorant people we are dealing. I like my privacy too but they aren't being reasonable.
If you don’t like Flock cameras then get them banned legislatively.
What I’m saying is there’s not going to be a constitutional basis for it. I personally do not see the problem here considering they’re all on public property.
I also don’t care if they’re banned.