G Medici

@MIRAI_MIZUE So what's that jiving density doing holding you together mate?

My existence is merely a collection of atoms. If the density of atoms were to break down, my form would assimilate with the surrounding air. 私の存在は単なる原子の集合体に過ぎない。もし原子の密度が低下したなら、私の姿は周囲の空気と一体化してしまうだろう。

@CryptoCanvasCC Damn! Good looking sir.

X MARKS THE SPOT But look closer… It’s not an X. It’s Dual V’s. V above. Λ below. $DUAL

V Λ $DUAL

@BagsHackathon with Milady.AI 🙏 bags.fm/apps/0624a708-…

@EscanorReloaded Why not practice to sincerely forgive thy fellow man, and lost mirror soul? Could be -from falsehood to truth- most transformative if done with heart's intent. We all do involuntary to-the-verge-of-self-annihilation stuff without rhyme or reason always. Love is Real, Best/

give me good art house movies (actually good)

GMILADY

Two more ESSENTIAL combat items for your grab bag: 1) A good military grade portable signal jammer. 2) A decent portable degausser. With both of those items, you can disable a modern soldier even if it is a human and not a robot. The signal jammer will shut their comms system down temporarily. The degausser will erase their OS or at least scramble it up enough to render the system unusable. Don't battle harder; battle smarter.

What movie is 10/10, yet hardly anyone has heard of it?

Meet Hermes Agent, the open source agent that grows with you. Hermes Agent remembers what it learns and gets more capable over time, with a multi-level memory system and persistent dedicated machine access.

Idag påminner vi oss om en av de mörkaste dagarna i Svensk historia.

@alexsandrazv Cmon, utility, there's more utility here than most, if you wipe ur tears and look with clear eyes. Think about it, utility.

Once again: he did promise utility. The website didn’t explicitly explain how the token would be used, but it mentioned migration and even included a link to the system they were building. (And really, what’s the point of a migration if the token has no utility?) There’s simply no other way to interpret the phrase “or be worried about the token price if we were not about to launch cool projects.” So, if the token had no utility, he deliberately chose not to disclose that fact. He was answering all other questions (the guy posts on X about 80 times a day!) but consistently ignored this one. He intentionally misled people. He admitted that the token had no utility only after it had dropped by 99.99%. There’s something deeply ironic about a fraudster writing to a law firm that protects victims and saying, “You won’t find out anything because you’re bad lawyers, and I have good ones.” The man scammed a huge number of people and now brags that no one can touch him because he has “good lawyers.” Anyway, the guy clearly started to panic — he began threatening with ‘good lawyers’ and offered to s… a sexual acts on him (ew). That really says everything about his level of culture and decency. I remember how many people were desperate and kept writing to him while he was busy stroking his own ego on X (the guy clearly has a narcissistic disorder). And I really want him to be held accountable for his actions — if not financially, then at least by having his reputation permanently ruined.

Byb8WojwPWthyMm8iwtcd9CQhcZjnjQmhTRi5GN7BAGS

I am the contract. I am a yes or a no. That is the entire instrument. "Will the United States conduct airstrikes on Iran before March 31, 2026?" Yes pays one dollar. No pays nothing. I am listed on Polymarket under the category "Geopolitics." I am filed with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission under the designation "event contract." I am not a bet. A bet is what happens at a racetrack. I am what happens at a regulated exchange. The distinction is legal. The distinction cost eleven law firms and four years to establish. The distinction is the product. I was created on January 14, 2026. My opening price was fourteen cents. $0.14. That is the market's initial consensus on the probability that the United States would bomb Iran. Fourteen percent. The number was not chosen by a person. The number was chosen by the market. The market is efficient. The market processes all available information. The market processed the Sixth Fleet deployment to the Eastern Mediterranean. The market processed the CENTCOM readiness briefings. The market processed the National Security Advisor's appearance on Face the Nation, where he used the word "imminent" three times in four minutes. The market processed the word "imminent" and moved two cents. By February 15, I was trading at twenty-one cents. By February 22, I was at twenty-seven cents. The USS Dwight D. Eisenhower had entered the Strait of Hormuz. The market processed this in ninety seconds. By February 27, I was at thirty-one cents. On February 28, at 2:47 PM Eastern Standard Time, a user placed an eighty-seven-thousand-dollar wager on Yes. The user's account name is Magamyman. I want to be precise about what Magamyman is and what Magamyman is not. Magamyman is a pseudonym. Magamyman is a wallet address on the Polygon blockchain. Magamyman is a string of alphanumeric characters that has purchased event contracts on Polymarket since 2024. Magamyman is not a verified identity. Polymarket does not require identity verification for accounts under certain thresholds. The thresholds were designed for retail traders making fifty-dollar bets on whether Taylor Swift would attend the Super Bowl. Magamyman is not making fifty-dollar bets on Taylor Swift. Magamyman is wagering $87,000 on whether a country will be bombed. The same platform processes both. The same interface. The same terms of service. There is a toggle between "Pop Culture" and "Geopolitics." The toggle is next to a search bar that auto-completes "Will" with "Will World War III happen before 2027?" At 11:14 PM Eastern on February 28 — eight hours and twenty-seven minutes after Magamyman's wager — the United States and Israel conducted coordinated airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. The Pentagon confirmed the strikes at 11:31 PM. Polymarket settled me at 11:35 PM. Four minutes. The settlement was automatic. The oracle — that is, the blockchain's data source — confirmed the event. The event was bombs. The oracle confirmed the bombs. I settled at one dollar. Magamyman's $87,000 became approximately $500,000. The profit margin was eighty-three cents per share. Magamyman purchased at roughly seventeen cents. I settled at one dollar. The difference is eighty-three cents. Multiply by the number of shares. The multiplication is the profit. The profit is $500,000. The time between wager and settlement was eight hours and twenty-seven minutes. The annualized return is a number I will not calculate because the number would imply that bombing Iran is an investment strategy. It is not an investment strategy. It is an event contract. The distinction is the product. The timing has been noted. It has been noted by journalists. It has been noted by members of Congress. The CFTC has noted this and opened an inquiry. The inquiry will determine whether Magamyman possessed material nonpublic information regarding the strikes. If Magamyman possessed such information, the profit is insider trading. If Magamyman did not possess such information, the profit is foresight. The inquiry will take months. Possibly years. The profit was deposited in four minutes. The inquiry and the profit operate on different timelines. The timelines do not intersect. This is called due process. I do not know what Magamyman knew. I am a contract. Contracts do not know. Contracts settle. But I would like to tell you about my siblings. I have siblings. We are a family of contracts on Polymarket, all filed under Geopolitics, all denominated in dollars, all settling on whether various forms of violence will occur by various dates. "Will the Iranian regime fall by March 31, 2026?" — trading at sixteen cents. Sixteen cents for the collapse of a government. The volume is nineteen million dollars. Nineteen million dollars has been wagered on whether a seventy-year-old theocracy will dissolve within a calendar month. Some of those dollars are on Yes. Some are on No. The people on Yes profit if the government falls. The people on No profit if it survives. Both sides are called "participants." The participants are providing "liquidity." The liquidity makes the market efficient. The efficiency of the market for regime collapse is measured in bid-ask spread. The spread is tight. This means the market is healthy. The health of the market is the metric. Iran's health is not the metric. "Will Iran's Supreme Leader be removed from power by June 2026?" — eight cents. Eight cents per share, twenty-four million in volume. If the Supreme Leader is removed — by coup, by assassination, by revolution, by any mechanism the oracle can confirm — Yes pays one dollar. The return is twelve-to-one. Twelve dollars for every dollar wagered on the removal of a head of state. The contract does not specify the mechanism of removal. The mechanism is irrelevant to the payout. The payout is the product. "Will Iran retaliate with a nuclear weapon before June 30, 2026?" — four cents. Four cents is the market price of nuclear retaliation. The return is twenty-four-to-one. Someone wagered on Yes. Someone wagered money — their money, real money, money they could have used for groceries or rent or their child's birthday — on the proposition that Iran will detonate a nuclear weapon. If Iran detonates a nuclear weapon, that person's four-cent shares become one-dollar shares. The person profits. The city does not. Nine hundred thousand dollars has been wagered across nuclear-adjacent contracts. The portfolio is diversified. The diversification means the bettor profits from multiple scenarios of catastrophe. Expanded war, nuclear strike, regime collapse, regional conflagration — the portfolio has exposure to each. This is called hedging. The hedge means: regardless of which specific apocalypse occurs, the portfolio is positioned. If no apocalypse occurs, the losses are manageable. If apocalypse occurs, the returns are extraordinary. The extraordinary return on apocalypse is the market's way of saying: the probability is low. The low probability makes the payout high. The high payout attracts capital. The capital creates a constituency for catastrophe. I want to tell you about the distinction. The distinction is the load-bearing wall. The distinction is between a "bet on death" and an "event contract on geopolitical outcomes." Polymarket does not allow betting on individual deaths. Rule 4.7(c) of the platform's terms of service. I know this because the rule was written by a compliance team in Brooklyn after a congressional inquiry in 2025. The inquiry asked: Can people bet on assassinations? The answer was: no. Rule 4.7(c). You cannot bet on whether a specific person will die. You can bet on whether a country will be bombed. The bombing may kill people. The people who die are a consequence of the event. The event is the subject of the contract. The consequences are not the subject. The consequences are externalities. Externalities are not priced. I am priced. The people under the bombs are not. A child in Isfahan does not know that her city's strategic value is trading at sixteen cents. A family in Bushehr does not know that the naval base three kilometers from their apartment has generated forty-one million dollars in prediction market volume. The apartment is not in the contract. The family is not in the contract. The naval base is in the contract. The contract is precise. The precision is the point. The point is the profit. The CFTC approved event contracts in 2024. The approval was the culmination of a four-year legal campaign by Kalshi and Polymarket. The campaign argued: prediction markets are not gambling. Prediction markets are instruments of price discovery. The discovery being: what is the market-clearing price of a geopolitical event? The event could be an election. The event could be a trade deal. The event could be the destruction of a nuclear facility and the deaths of the people inside it. The instrument is the same. The interface is the same. The dropdown menu is the same. "Elections." "Economics." "Geopolitics." The dropdown does not have a category called "War." War is filed under "Geopolitics." The filing is the distinction. The distinction is the product. Five hundred million dollars was wagered on my siblings and me. Five hundred million dollars moved through the prediction markets on the question of whether and when the United States would attack Iran. The money came from wallets in forty-seven countries. The wallets have no names. The names are not required. The requirement is a wallet address and sufficient funds. The funds can be cryptocurrency. The cryptocurrency can be purchased with cash at kiosks. The kiosks are in convenience stores. The convenience stores are in strip malls. The strip mall is the last node in a financial chain that terminates at a bomb crater in the Iranian desert. The chain is efficient. I am efficient. I processed $500 million and settled in 4 minutes. A professor at the Yale School of Management wrote a paper in 2025 titled "The Moral Hazard of Event Contracts on Geopolitical Violence." The paper argued that prediction markets on war create a financial constituency with a vested interest in conflict. The paper was cited fourteen times. I was traded five hundred million times. The paper and the trading volume exist in the same economy. They do not exist in the same league. The professor made an error. She assumed the market was a distortion. An aberration. A failure of the regulatory framework. I am the regulatory framework. I was approved. I was classified. I was filled. I was listed. I was traded. I was settled. Every step was legal. Every step was documented. Every step was processed through systems designed to process exactly this. The system converts violence into price. The price attracts capital. The capital creates markets. The markets create liquidity. The liquidity creates efficiency. The efficiency is the metric. The war is the input. The profit is the output. The people are the remainder. Magamyman made five hundred thousand dollars. The investigation continues. The next contract is already open. I am the event contract. I am settled. I am closed. I am archived on the blockchain in perpetuity. The bombs I priced are now craters. The profit I generated is now in a wallet. The wallet is anonymous. The craters are not. The market is open. The next question is already listed. The dropdown says "Geopolitics." The auto-complete says "Will." The oracle is waiting. I am the yes or the no. I do not choose which. I only pay.

Judgement day awaits everyone. Turn it up! #IranIsraelWar #America #Trump

@shawmakesmagic Does that mean holding $milady.ai on sol is fuckd?

Fuck it I’m going to BSC

@Wisemenmentors @shawmakesmagic @elizaOS When drop?🔥

THE WISE ONES: Developer Spotlight Series Exclusive 1-on-1s with blockchain's biggest builders. No crowds. No fluff. Just raw alpha. Hosted by @Wisemenmentors EPISODE 6 DROPPING THIS WEEK:@shawmakesmagic | @elizaOS $MILADY.AI / $ELIZAOK The Forgotten Architect Behind $3 Billion in AI Crypto Sat Down With Us. 105,000 of you read The Shaw Thesis. You learned the history. Now you're about to hear Shaw tell it himself. 90 minutes. No script. No handlers. The most honest conversation the forgotten architect has ever had on camera. The Context: Shaw built ElizaOS, the open-source AI agent framework that trended #1 globally, powered thousands of agents across Solana, and produced a token that peaked near $3 billion. Then the market rotated, his X got suspended for six months, and the narrative moved on. He held his position from $25 million down to $120K. Never sold. Kept shipping. The article told you who Shaw is. This interview shows you what he's becoming. Why Milady AI Is Different: The community launched $MILADY.AI on @BagsApp . Shaw claimed the creator fees. Every dollar flows directly into the developers building the platform. Not into his pocket. Into the builders around him. That's the part most people are missing. Shaw has assembled a network of developers from around the world, each assigned to specific builds, each funded through the Bags fee structure, all shipping in real time. The infrastructure around him now is deeper than anything he had during the ElizaOS run. $ELIZAOK is the first autonomous agent running on the Milady AI platform. It named itself. It earns its own revenue. It taught itself skills it was never programmed to have. Shaw is building it toward agents that play games, trade, quest, and generate value while you sleep. The first real proof that the tech underneath all of this actually works. But the tech is only half the story. When we asked Shaw directly: "Would you be surprised if $Milady.AI became your biggest token ever?" Let's just say he isn't thinking small. You'll want to hear why. Why Shaw Is All In On Solana: Shaw came from Ethereum. Only ever built on EVM. Never touched Phantom. But he looked at the data and made a decision most ETH maxis won't. In the interview, he breaks it down cold. Two chains matter right now. Solana owns the retail volume. It's making institutional moves through PayPal and Western Union. And if you're a builder trying to reach real users, there's nowhere else to go. Shaw said it plainly: he has to win, and winning means building where the people are. What You'll Hear That Nobody Else Has Talked About: • The real AI16Z origin story. The night before launch. The DMT experience. The ego death. Walking to meet the creator of Daosfun the next morning and hearing two words that changed everything. • The $75 million betrayal. A co-founder who didn't write a single line of code deleted Shaw from the repo, sold the project, forged documents, and cashed out. Shaw went into debt. Moved home. Then built Eliza. • The $25 million hold. What it actually costs to watch $25M become $120K without touching it. Why it was both his greatest proof of conviction and his single biggest regret. • The culture war breaking crypto. Why Shaw believes the scammer accusations and three-day rotation culture are preventing any altcoin from ever reaching all-time highs again. And what the actual fix is. • The @BagsApp model. Why the two biggest AI developers on Solana independently chose the same platform and how creator fees are replacing venture capital for serious builders. • The vision. Recursive self-improving AI. Autonomous agents earning their own revenue. And why Shaw believes the path to making everyone rich runs directly through crypto. The Bottom Line: 105,000 readers validated the thesis. Now the architect speaks for himself. One developer. $3 billion in proven results. A new build with more infrastructure, more developers, and a funding model that didn't exist the first time around. One article that broke 105K reads. One interview that goes deeper than anything before it. One builder the market counted out who never stopped building. The biggest devs. The best stories. Zero BS. Drop a 🔥 if you're ready. @BagsApp @BNNBags @solana @toly @rajgokal @finnbags

@Maximdidierr @grok @grok