Aule10

@usapatriot20 @krassenstein Little friend, Even the most accurate AI can not get more than 80% correct. You need to use source critisme when using an AI and make sure everything is says is from a credible source. AI does not have this ability.

@aule10 @krassenstein AI is wrong, but you’re right, right Libbie? LMAO, that’s why you’re misguided and misinformed. Maybe give AI a try once in a while and pick up something new.

BREAKING: Trump - "With a little more time, we can easily open the Hormuz Strait, take the oil, and make a fortune. It would be a ‘gusher’ for the world." Newsflash. This is not our oil. It’s the Iranian peoples’ oil. What you were talking about is called theft. I wouldn’t expect anything else from a convicted felon.

@silentblossom_ Talk about a hypocrite. He has no morale standing on this one.

🚨 BREAKING: Donald Trump has decided to withdraw the U.S. from UN-Habitat, UN Women, and 66 other organizations funded by American taxpayers. He says the UN promotes invasions instead of stopping them, and America will no longer fund its own harm. We should support Donald Trump on this decision 🤔

@USronaldcarter No he is reckless. You know why? Because all the other president knew this was not a war they could win. He is proud of his deals, But he decided to rip up the deal in his first term, and second term he decided to enter a war he cant win. They still have the uranium.

I just got off the phone with someone who works in defense policy in Washington. What they told me should end every "Trump is reckless" argument permanently. "Every single president since Clinton received the same intelligence briefing on Iran's nuclear timeline. Every single one was told the window was closing. Every single one chose to kick it down the road because the political cost of acting was higher than the political cost of waiting." Trump got the same briefing. 60kg of 90% enriched uranium. 4 weeks to breakout. Material for 2 bombs. He chose to act knowing it would tank his approval to 35%. He chose to act knowing his own base would split. He chose to act knowing NATO allies would refuse to help. He chose to act knowing gas prices would spike. A senior analyst I know at a major think tank put it this way: "The difference between Trump and every president before him isn't intelligence. They all had the same data. The difference is courage." Read that again. Every president had the same file on their desk. Only one opened it and did something. I'll keep you updated. Turn on notifications. 🚨

@Arrogance_0024 EHh they lost the war because you cant hold a country you invaded without having troupes in it. Change has to come from within not outside forces.

Unpopular take: the US lost the war in Vietnam because NATO didn't help.

@nicksortor ofc Trump wont be happy. It goes against all the Dripple he have tried to claim this past month.

🚨 BREAKING: Despite President Trump’s threats, the Iranian regime has REJECTED all US demands, and is refusing to show up to meet with US officials in Islamabad for peace talks, per WSJ and Bloomberg That’s a mistake. President Trump isn’t going to be happy.

@theepicmap It is simple, natural straits can not be taxed in accordance to international laws. This is done to avoid countries like Denmark, like Iran, like Spain, like turkey to take taxes from ships traveling there. Does it suck? Sure but on the other hand transport cost less because ofit

Why hasn’t Spain put €2 million per ship toll here to finance their 52 billion/year deficit?? Are they stupid??

@usapatriot20 @krassenstein And this is what happens when someone relies on an AI. You got so many things wrong, that my measly free twitter account cant state even the first thing without hitting the limit.

You don't seem to know a damn thing about what you are talking about. As a straight, white, American, conservative constitutionalist, patriotic Christian, married MAGA supporter, and pro-Trump patriot who puts America First, I see President Trump's tough talk on Iranian oil as common-sense leverage against a terrorist regime that has spilled American blood, funded proxies like Hezbollah and Hamas, chased nuclear weapons, and chanted "Death to America" since 1979. The mullahs' regime is evil—it oppresses its own people, persecutes Christians, and threatens our ally Israel. Trump is right to squeeze them hard after years of weak Biden-era appeasement that let Iran fund terror and enrich uranium. Trump's Recent Statements (as of early April 2026) In the context of ongoing U.S. military operations against Iran (strikes on nuclear sites, infrastructure, and pressure to reopen the Strait of Hormuz amid blocked shipping and rising global oil prices), Trump has said: His "preference" and "favorite thing" would be to take the oil in Iran, including possibly seizing or controlling Kharg Island (Iran's main oil export terminal, handling ~90% of its crude exports). He noted "maybe we take Kharg Island, maybe we don't. We have a lot of options." He has threatened to "obliterate" Iranian electric plants, oil wells, and Kharg Island if no deal is reached quickly. He told allies dependent on Hormuz oil to "go get your own oil," "grab it and cherish it," or "just take it" themselves—while offering U.S. oil instead, since America is energy-dominant and doesn't need it. A White House official echoed that the U.S. aims to get "all of the oil" out of terrorists' hands. This is pressure tactics during conflict—not random theft. Trump frames it as denying revenue to a regime that sponsors terror, while protecting American interests and global energy stability. U.S. Domestic Law and Presidential Authority Constitutional War Powers: Article II makes the President Commander-in-Chief. In armed conflict (especially against a designated state sponsor of terrorism like Iran, with the IRGC as a Foreign Terrorist Organization), the President has broad authority to conduct operations, including targeting enemy infrastructure, resources, and economic assets that fund the war effort. Historical precedent allows seizure or destruction of enemy property during hostilities (e.g., WWII oil targeting). No formal congressional declaration of war is strictly required for limited actions, though the War Powers Resolution (1973) requires notification to Congress within 48 hours of introducing forces into hostilities and aims for withdrawal after 60-90 days without authorization—presidents of both parties have stretched or challenged its limits. Sanctions and Economic Tools: Under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), Iran Sanctions Act, and related laws, Trump has restored "maximum pressure" sanctions to drive Iran's oil exports to zero. This includes blocking sales, sanctioning the "shadow fleet" of tankers, and forfeiting illicit cargoes (as done with Venezuelan/Iran-linked tankers via DOJ civil forfeiture when vessels are stateless or violate U.S. law). Proceeds can go to the U.S. Treasury or victims, not the regime. Forfeiture of Illicit Oil: U.S. forces have seized tankers on the high seas carrying Iranian oil tied to the IRGC (using warrants for sanctions violations or terror financing). This is treated as law enforcement against designated terrorists—not "stealing" sovereign oil, but interdicting proceeds of crime. Courts have upheld similar actions. Trump can direct the military to strike oil facilities or interdict shipments as part of degrading Iran's war-making capacity. Permanent annexation or commercial exploitation of Iranian oil fields by the U.S. government would push legal boundaries without clearer congressional backing or post-conflict occupation authority. International Law Realities International law (UN Charter, customary rules) generally prohibits seizing another sovereign state's natural resources in peacetime as aggression or violation of territorial sovereignty. In active armed conflict, laws of war (Hague/Geneva conventions) allow targeting military/economic assets supporting the enemy, destruction of infrastructure, and temporary control of territory—but not permanent plunder for profit. "Taking the oil" for U.S. commercial sale would face accusations of violating resource sovereignty, though critics (often from adversarial nations like China) routinely ignore Iran's own aggression, nuclear cheating, and terror exports. In practice, during hot conflict, the stronger power's actions on the ground often prevail over paper rules. Allies like Israel have long understood that weakness invites more attacks from Iran. Trump prioritizes American strength over globalist hand-wringing. Bottom Line from an America First View Trump isn't "stealing" like some leftist or globalist would caricature—he's using every tool (sanctions, strikes, leverage, and yes, potential seizure of enemy assets) to crush a regime that has murdered Americans for decades, from the 1983 Beirut barracks (241 Marines) to EFPs in Iraq to October 7 enablers. Denying oil revenue starves their terror machine, nuclear program, and oppression at home. If seizing Kharg or interdicting oil weakens them faster and forces a real deal (or regime change), that's smart warfare, not charity. Congress could pass explicit authorization if needed for larger-scale occupation, but as constitutionalists, we recognize the executive's lead in national security against clear threats. Weakness (Obama/Biden deals that funded Iran) got us here. Strength ends it. America produces plenty of its own oil—Trump made us energy independent before. We don't "need" Iran's, but crushing their ability to fund jihad protects our troops, Israel, and civilized nations. The Iranian regime deserves no mercy until it stops threatening us and our allies. Trump is delivering the pressure they fear. God bless President Trump, our military, and the United States of America. Peace through strength isn't a slogan—it's survival.

@krassenstein He is delusional. He would need land troupes for that, and he needs to fight an army 1 million people strong.

@koshercockney Kosher he has already been to USA, he is the new leader of Syria, we can not pretend he is not a country leader. So Let me ask you this, why should UK abstain when USA does not?

This is who the Prime Minister of the UK and the King of England welcomed and shook hands with. Jolani is former Al-Qaeda, whose men in Syria butchered Christians, Druze and Alawites only a few months ago (see thread) I feel sick.

@puNktum_ @MSchneekloth2 @RasmusJarlov @N_A_S_T_T @gordon758 You really does not know much about Scandinavian history do you? You are aware that norway was under danish rule right? Norway was not its own country from 1521 until 1905 first under Denmark then under sweden (1812)

@aule10 @MSchneekloth2 @RasmusJarlov @N_A_S_T_T @gordon758 In 986 Norwegian settlers settled in Greenland, 1360 or something officially Norwegian (also Iceland btw.) Then in 1814 after napoleonic wars Denmark was handed the lands because they’re gay. This is facts. So yes, Denmark stole it from Norway after almost 1000 years

In the future, there will be three major powers in the world: China, USA, EU. Neutral countries will move as much as possible towards the EU as their preferred partner because both China and the USA treat other countries disrespectfully and try to extort them. Europe will be the only great power and market to turn to if you want to have an equal and fair relationship. Canada is already moving towards Europe for this exact reason. India and Japan will also form a closer relationship with Europe. This is what soft power means. MAGA replies in the comment section will prove the point.

@beryl_k4168 @saniyafatma1278 depends on the country.

@saniyafatma1278 It will become a big problem when you want to sell your house. By leaving his fence on your property for more than 7 years, he can claim that 7 inches as his property. Pay for a survey. Have your attorney send a demand letter for him to move it. Protect yourself.

@EricLDaugh Eric you know how you avoid getting your people killed? By not meddling in other countries shit. Stay in your lane and save life.

🚨 JUST IN: French President Emmanuel Macron goes full COWARD MODE, says he wishes President Trump didn't bomb Iran's world-threatening regime "I disagree with them...but I don't believe we fix it by bombing!" "Respect the sovereignty of people." What a clueless clown 🤡🤡

@BrontosaurB @jackprandelli Europa didnt pick a fight, Trump did when he started threatening EU with tarrifs, with breaking up alliances, invasions of sovereign countries etc. etc.

@jackprandelli Europe picked a really stupid time to start fighting with America, let alone aligning against the Gulf States, who they are also dependent on for energy.

🇪🇺 Europe didn't just buy US LNG It became dependent on it. 55% of all EU LNG imports now come from the US. 4 years ago that number was 28%. H1 2021 → 28% H1 2025 → 55% Qatar declared force majeure on European contracts. Hormuz is closed. Russian gas is sanctioned. The only reliable supplier left with scale? America That's not energy security. That's trading one dependency for another. And Washington knows exactly how much leverage that buys. Every LNG tanker leaving the US Gulf Coast is a negotiating chip. Energy is the new currency of alliance. 💡Subscribe to my newsletter, link in my bio

@ENaughtius @jackprandelli Russia started the war, this is not a lie.

@jackprandelli Yes, the US tricked EU into all this. They made Ukraine escalate attacks on Donbas region in 2016 and provoke Russia into war. Then they lied to EU that Russia started the war and forced EU to sanction Russia and then they destroyed the North Stream pipeline..

@jackprandelli One important note you need to look at here is IMPORTS. What about you hold it up towards total usage.

@NtoriDoc @amuse @EagleInTheCloud @EU_Commission @SecWar @dbznd Congratulation you just won the Stupidist attempt to Prove someone wrong. You could look it up. I admit i was 4 bases wrong, USA has 24 military bases in Europa so double of what i had heard. But no there are not 275 military bases in Europa that USA owns.

@aule10 @amuse @EagleInTheCloud @EU_Commission @SecWar @dbznd It’s hard to be so stupid in this age of instant access to information But, Congratulations! “..2026, the USA operates approximately 275 military installations across Europe..includes..31 "persistent" (major) bases..240 smaller..shared-use sites.” #WakeUpAmerica @dbznd

OPERATION GREENLAND: Trump negotiated 2 new US special forces & maritime bases in Greenland under a 1951 treaty while considering closing 200+ European installations & bring home 100,000 troops. America is may very well be done subsidizing European security. Greenland is the future.

@CrushinLibs24_7 @SaltyGoat17 we do.

@SaltyGoat17 Agree 💯% .... Let EUROPE handle their own defense....

Total NATO defense spending (2025): United States: $980,000,000,000 Europe + Canada: $512,337,000,000 We pay almost twice as much as ALL the other countries COMBINED!! And who protects who? Anyone else tired of being the world's ATM?

@BagmanCFO @Keith_GadgetUK @SaltyGoat17 our defense budget is reduced because there as not war nor any eminent threat. That is until Russia Attacked Ukraine. Now Europa is rearming, because there now is a threat to our boarders.

European nations for at least two decades reduced their defense spending relying upon the United States military as the shield. Only until Russia invaded Ukraine did spending increase. Yes, leaving or reducing support to NATO and redeploying forces closer to the United States will save money.

@SaltyGoat17 Salty not really how you can set it up. You have to look at the overall forces. Reason being not everyone has the same wager as USA has, nor as expensive gear, nor putting as much money into R&D.

@Duck0fD3ath24 @amuse I am really not seeing what you are seeing. All i am seeing is USA just uses the rights they already has, he could had done this 15 month ago.

I'm not Muad'Dib forsooth! I got the gist of it. Before I posted about Greenland, nobody was discussing it. It had dropped off the screen because of the Iran war. Talks were ongoing secretly but I figured out that Greenland was the key to solving the Nato problem. Did YOU see it coming?