bchang2001 (HV-MTL)

2.3K posts

bchang2001 (HV-MTL) banner
bchang2001 (HV-MTL)

bchang2001 (HV-MTL)

@bchang2001

Dad of 3, BAYC holder, Made By Apes #489. holding BTC and ETH. providing leveraged life insurance products to high net worth individuals or degens.

Orange County, CA Katılım Mayıs 2009
1.6K Takip Edilen1.4K Takipçiler
bchang2001 (HV-MTL) retweetledi
Adam Weitsman
Adam Weitsman@AdamWeitsman·
Huge news ….. let’s go @hvmtl2 !!!!! Lots of hard work went into this for our community. You have no idea 😂 Congrats @Gabrielesm1 !!!! Proud of you brother !!!!
English
200
168
1K
132.5K
Science girl
Science girl@sciencegirl·
For those who used a computer between 1995 and 2001, what's the computer game from that time that sticks with you the most, and why
English
16.4K
404
7.6K
2.9M
bchang2001 (HV-MTL) retweetledi
DCRoth
DCRoth@RothDC·
All Good Things Come in Threes: @hvmtl2
English
42
61
208
44.4K
bchang2001 (HV-MTL) retweetledi
OpenSea
OpenSea@opensea·
Joining OpenSea’s Flagship Collection… @hvmtl2 — born from @yugalabs Dookey Dash Sewer Passes, evolving into 30K unique mechs, and now writing its next chapter under new ownership. Welcome home, 122. More below. 👇
OpenSea tweet media
English
75
95
446
88.5K
Bitcoin Teddy
Bitcoin Teddy@Bitcoin_Teddy·
Can anyone please explain me in simple words what the f*ck is going on with Bitcoin???
Bitcoin Teddy tweet media
English
8K
417
4.6K
2.1M
bchang2001 (HV-MTL) retweetledi
MAGA Voice
MAGA Voice@MAGAVoice·
HOLY SH*T 🚨 El Salvador President Nayib Bukele brings his entire Executive branch and AG to tell them they are all under investigation for bribery 🔥 “Investigate everyone sitting here” THIS IS ABSOLUTELY BADA**
English
704
8.3K
38.7K
1.2M
LakeShowYo
LakeShowYo@LakeShowYo·
Who stopping this duo? 💀
LakeShowYo tweet media
English
378
47
1.7K
136.1K
The Intellectualist
The Intellectualist@highbrow_nobrow·
Lawyer: “Have you ever had a personal relationship with Donald Trump?” Epstein: “Yes” Lawyer: “Have you socialized with him in the presence of females under 18?” Epstein: “I’m asserting my Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights.”
English
452
7.5K
48.9K
3.7M
Deborah
Deborah@guyswife_cocos·
@ICEgov Why can’t you guys do it humanely like Obama, Biden and Clinton?
English
131
2
39
48K
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
When you see videos of anti-ICE agitators swarming our officers and agents in Minneapolis, MN, just know… this is who they’re trying to protect. Below are some of the WORST of the worst we’ve arrested and taken out of MN neighborhoods to protect American families:
English
4.2K
7.6K
46.7K
3.3M
bchang2001 (HV-MTL) retweetledi
Adam Weitsman
Adam Weitsman@AdamWeitsman·
HV-MTL Marketplace is launching soon, where our holders will be able to trade HV-MTL for HV-MTL or multiple HV-MTLs. It will also include a feature called Mystery Box where holders can create a listing without knowing which NFT they will receive from the other person. This feature only works with NFTs from the same collection. This is just V1. We plan to add more products in the future and launch V2 soon. All whitelisted communities will be able to participate. We are not only building for HV-MTL but for the entire NFT community.
English
170
139
888
36.6K
bchang2001 (HV-MTL) retweetledi
Vlad (HV-MTL)
Vlad (HV-MTL)@heavy_vlad·
They said @hvmtl2 was just a "legacy" rugged collection. They said the story was over. But when @Gabrielesm1 and @AdamWeitsman took the wheel, they didn’t just buy a collection, they bought a mission to rebuild trust in Web3. They aren't just shipping for HV-MTL 👇
English
4
11
63
1.7K
bchang2001 (HV-MTL) retweetledi
A Gene Robinson
A Gene Robinson@AlBuffalo2nite·
🚨I DIDNT WANT to do it BUT I have too. You didn’t see this yet. The narrative that “he was just filming and the officers got angry” is false. The narrative that he was only trying to protect two women is also false. He, along with others, was actively interfering with a legitimate law-enforcement operation. That is why officers moved them off the street. That does not mean he deserved to die. When officers attempted to detain him, he resisted arrest. That does not mean he deserved to die. He was armed and chose to insert himself into an active enforcement operation while resisting arrest. That does not mean he deserved to die. An agent called out the presence of a firearm. During the attempt to secure it, the weapon discharged before the agent could declare the scene clear. Other officers, hearing a gun call and a gunshot while a suspect was resisting arrest, reacted according to their training. From their perspective, they were confronting an armed individual resisting arrest. That is why, immediately after the shooting, one officer urgently asked where the firearm was. He believed he had just engaged an armed suspect, because that is precisely the situation as it appeared in real time. He did not deserve to die. However, his actions, his decisions, and his criminal interference were contributing factors, alongside serious failures by the officers involved. I believe the shooting was unnecessary. I believe there were many alternative ways the situation could have been handled. I do not believe the officers were truly under lethal threat. Recklessness on all sides resulted in a man losing his life. Approximately 23 percent of ICE activity occurs in Texas, yet we do not see these outcomes there. Minnesota accounts for roughly 2 percent of ICE operations, yet has seen multiple shootings involving American citizens. The difference is organized resistance. Blue states have coordinated efforts designed to insert civilians into active ICE operations to interfere intentionally and directly. Interfering with law-enforcement operations is illegal, and it is dangerous. This is how people get killed. Resisting arrest is illegal, and it is dangerous. This is how people get killed. Within the Second Amendment community, there is a common saying: “I would rather be judged by twelve than carried by six.” It refers to choosing survival over moral victory. That same principle applies to interactions with law enforcement. Would you rather be right, or would you rather be alive? Make smart decisions when dealing with law enforcement. Survive the encounter. Then take the fight to court. Use every lawful platform available to expose misconduct. Name departments, supervisors, and officers. Demand accountability through evidence and process. But interfering with an active operation, resisting arrest, and doing so while armed creates a predictable and deadly outcome. Was it legal for him to be armed? Yes. Should citizens carry lawfully? Yes. Is it profoundly reckless to interfere with law enforcement and resist arrest while armed? Absolutely. When we carry firearms, we accept greater responsibility. That responsibility was neglected here. It is possible to support immigration enforcement while condemning reckless policing. It is possible to criticize law enforcement while also acknowledging the dangerous behavior of civilians. It is possible to recognize complexity, rapid escalation, human error, and shared responsibility in a fast-moving situation. He did not have to die. Liberty only survives when it operates within order. Nothing about this situation was orderly. When order collapses, lives are lost. He did not have to die.
English
1.4K
2.1K
9K
714.2K
bchang2001 (HV-MTL)
bchang2001 (HV-MTL)@bchang2001·
@GinoTheGhost It's so unfortunate that someone has to lose their life. but why would you put yourself in that situation. Bringing a gun to a protest is like smoking near a powder keg.
English
2
0
6
2K
gino.eth 💽
gino.eth 💽@GinoTheGhost·
1. Alex Pretti, an ICU nurse and American citizen, peacefully assembles on the streets of Minneapolis. First amendment. 2. Alex has a legally licensed firearm concealed and tucked in his waistband. Second amendment. 3. An unarmed woman is shoved to the ground by a masked federal agent. Alex steps forward to intervene with his phone in his hand. He’s pepper-sprayed, then tackled to the ground by multiple ICE agents with his hands in the air. 4. While on all fours, 6 agents beat him while another agent pistol whips him in the face. Another agent snatches Alex’s firearm from his waistband and walks away. 5. The agents fire ten shots at point blank range, killing him. 6. Despite 3+ angles of video evidence, the administration launches a smear campaign and claims Alex was a domestic terrorist and “would-be assassin” that intended to massacre law enforcement. If you’re *still* defending this, I hope you’re prepared to go down with the ship.
English
108
455
2.5K
113.7K
Nash
Nash@nashahmed3·
my silver Gucci Koda Pendant is now up 5X from when I bought it back in 2022.
Nash tweet mediaNash tweet media
English
21
0
109
5.9K