Baron Roman von Ungern-Sternberg

2K posts

Baron Roman von Ungern-Sternberg banner
Baron Roman von Ungern-Sternberg

Baron Roman von Ungern-Sternberg

@beansthecat69

look me up

Katılım Temmuz 2024
270 Takip Edilen100 Takipçiler
SWOLE Nephi 💪🏻
SWOLE Nephi 💪🏻@LargeInStature_·
If an LDS politician accused Evangelicals of being fake Christians moments after one of their congregations got massacred, they would be in a full on rage, foaming at the mouth. These people are such hypocrites. I don't have to vote for someone who hates me. @oldstatemark
English
9
7
324
3K
Ellis
Ellis@OldUncleEllis·
For outsiders, it might seem weird how hostile mainline Christians are to LDS but I can explain it. It’s financial. Most Christian pastors are paid, and paid commensurate with the size of their congregation. The LDS Church’s missionary work takes money out of their pocket.
quest@q_3st

@oldstatemark

English
42
15
273
12.5K
Mike S. Miller - Drawing into the Future
I literally posted 5 or 6 scriptures that make the point. Denial ain't just a river in Egypt. Also, if the scripture taught that we were already the children of God, it wouldn't change my view of God. But the fact that it teaches we aren't his children UNTIL WE ARE ADOPTED really does throw your entire cosmology for a loop. I understand why you're blind to it. You have to be to maintain your dogma.
English
1
0
0
14
Mike S. Miller - Drawing into the Future
If that is hard to understand for you, it is only because your dogma is blinding you to what is right in front of your face. Remove your preconception that we are 'children of God' and read it again, and you'll recognize how clearly it is teaching that we must be adopted to become Children of God. You have blinders on.
English
1
0
0
14
Josh
Josh@_JonesJ_·
@baguley61 @beansthecat69 @LargeInStature_ @oldstatemark 21st century was Thomas Jacob Sanford driving straight into a chapel of our church, lighting it on fire, shooting at our members and our children, and 4 dying. All because he believed we were not Christian and we were the devil. That is 21st century my man.
English
2
0
1
50
Mike S. Miller - Drawing into the Future
It's point blank: John 1 12But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: 13Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. Can you be given something you already have? Can you become something you already are? NO. In case you had trouble answering those questions, you can not. God created everything. Men, women, dogs, bugs, viruses, but the ONLY THING he claimed as his 'sons' were Adam and the Angels. Direct creations. I DEFY YOU to find anything to the contrary.
English
1
0
0
8
Disclose.tv
Disclose.tv@disclosetv·
NOW - Thomas Massie concedes his Kentucky Primary race: "Welcome to the most expensive congressional primary ever in the 250 year history of this country."
English
294
805
10.7K
915K
Mike S. Miller - Drawing into the Future
We are not God's children until we are adopted by him. You say, 'retarded doctrine'. You just called the Bible retarded. Romans 8 14For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God. 15For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father. 16The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God: 17And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together. 23And not only they, but ourselves also, which have the firstfruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the redemption of our body. Ephesians 1 5Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will, 6To the praise of the glory of his grace, wherein he hath made us accepted in the beloved. 7In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace; Galatians 4 4But when the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, 5To redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons. 6And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father. 7Wherefore thou art no more a servant, but a son; and if a son, then an heir of God through Christ. 8Howbeit then, when ye knew not God, ye did service unto them which by nature are no gods. John 1 12But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: 13Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. NOWHERE in the Old testament are we ever called the children, sons, or daughters of God. We are benai adam. sons of MAN. The only sons of God are his direct created beings, ADAM and angels. It is in the New Testament, and through Christ alone that we are GIVEN THE RIGHT TO BECOME CHILDREN OF GOD. Your doctrine/dogma is unbiblical.
English
1
0
0
16
Mike S. Miller - Drawing into the Future
No, you're applying your theology to the scripture, ignoring the scripture that directly contradicts what you believe, and adhering to the scripture that may vaguely agree with your dogma. You don't understand James, you have to reject Paul. I understand both, and understand how they agree with each other.
English
1
0
0
7
Tatermilk™
Tatermilk™@CapnTatermilk·
@WurzelRoot neither race likes the way the other smells. This is because we aren't meant to be close enough to smell one another.
English
26
34
2.1K
260K
Mike S. Miller - Drawing into the Future
18I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him. 19And it shall come to pass, that whosoever will not hearken unto my words which he shall speak in my name, I will require it of him. 20But the prophet, which shall presume to speak a word in my name, which I have not commanded him to speak, or that shall speak in the name of other gods, even that prophet shall die. 21And if thou say in thine heart, How shall we know the word which the LORD hath not spoken? 22When a prophet speaketh in the name of the LORD, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which the LORD hath not spoken, but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously: thou shalt not be afraid of him. God's standards are too high for your fake prophet. Bye now.
English
1
0
0
12
Baron Roman von Ungern-Sternberg retweetledi