Bea Policarpio 🇵🇭

22.8K posts

Bea Policarpio 🇵🇭 banner
Bea Policarpio 🇵🇭

Bea Policarpio 🇵🇭

@beapolicarpio

Artist on IG @polipaints 💌

MNL Katılım Nisan 2009
447 Takip Edilen1.3K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Bea Policarpio 🇵🇭
Bea Policarpio 🇵🇭@beapolicarpio·
When will you realize Vienna waits for ü
Bea Policarpio 🇵🇭 tweet media
English
0
0
8
0
Bea Policarpio 🇵🇭 retweetledi
Gary Vaynerchuk
Gary Vaynerchuk@garyvee·
When you realize you can only control how YOU react to someone else's energy, that changes everything.
English
104
119
799
38.2K
Bea Policarpio 🇵🇭 retweetledi
Sahil Bloom
Sahil Bloom@SahilBloom·
I’m increasingly convinced that the ultimate sign of growth is faster recovery. You still get upset. You still make mistakes. You still have bad days. But you return to center faster. Apologize faster. Reset faster. Learn faster. Fast recovery compounds.
English
144
316
2.4K
83.1K
Bea Policarpio 🇵🇭 retweetledi
Naval
Naval@naval·
Good marketing is finding different ways to tell the truth.
English
542
1.4K
13.6K
442.1K
Bea Policarpio 🇵🇭 retweetledi
Ihtesham Ali
Ihtesham Ali@ihtesham2005·
Does money buy happiness? A Princeton Nobel laureate said no above $75,000. A Penn researcher with 1.7 million data points said yes. The day they sat down together to settle the fight, the answer they reached should change how you think about your own life. The Nobel laureate is Daniel Kahneman. The Penn researcher is Matthew Killingsworth. The fight between them lasted 13 years, and the way it ended is one of the cleanest examples in modern science of two smart people being wrong in opposite directions about the same question. In 2010 Kahneman and his Princeton colleague Angus Deaton published a paper that became one of the most quoted findings in the history of social science. They analyzed 450,000 responses to the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index and concluded that emotional well-being rose steadily with income up to about $75,000 a year, and then flattened out completely. Above that line, the extra money was not buying any more daily happiness. The headline traveled around the world. Every news outlet ran the number. A CEO in Seattle famously cut his own salary to raise his employees to that exact threshold. The 75,000 dollar figure became cultural shorthand for the idea that the rich are not actually any happier than the rest of us once basic needs are met. For 11 years almost nobody seriously challenged it. Kahneman had a Nobel Prize in Economics, the sample size was massive, and the conclusion was emotionally satisfying in a way that made everyone feel a little better about not being wealthy. Then in 2021 a 33 year old researcher at the University of Pennsylvania published a paper that quietly destroyed the entire finding. His name is Matthew Killingsworth. He had spent the previous decade building a smartphone app called Track Your Happiness that pinged users at random moments during their day and asked them a simple question. How do you feel right now, on a scale from very bad to very good. The app was designed to catch happiness in the act, not to ask people to recall it later. By 2021 he had collected over 1.7 million real-time happiness reports from 33,000 adults. When he plotted income against in-the-moment well-being, there was no plateau anywhere. The line just kept rising. People earning $200,000 were happier on average than people earning $100,000. People earning $400,000 were happier than people earning $200,000. The curve flattened slightly but never stopped climbing. The famous $75,000 ceiling that the world had been quoting for 11 years simply did not exist in his data. Now there were two Nobel-quality findings sitting in direct contradiction with each other. One of them had to be wrong, and neither researcher was willing to walk away. What happened next is the part of the story almost nobody knows. Kahneman called Killingsworth and proposed something rare in academic science. He called it an adversarial collaboration. The two of them, joined by Penn psychologist Barbara Mellers as a neutral referee, would sit down together and reanalyze the raw data from both studies, line by line, until they figured out which one of them was wrong. The paper they co-authored was published in March 2023 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. And the answer they reached was not what either of them had expected. Both of them had been right at the same time. They had been measuring two different populations without realizing it. When the team broke Killingsworth's 1.7 million data points apart by baseline happiness, the picture clarified completely. For the happiest 70 percent of people, more money kept buying more happiness all the way up to $500,000 a year, with no sign of slowing down. For people in the middle, the same pattern held. But for the bottom 20 percent of the sample, the ones who were already unhappy before the question of money even came up, the curve flattened almost exactly where Kahneman's original paper had said it would. Above roughly $100,000 a year, adjusted for inflation, more money did nothing for them. This is the finding that changes how the question should be asked. If you are not already unhappy, money keeps buying happiness for a much longer stretch than Kahneman's original paper suggested. The runway is wider than the world has been telling itself for a decade. If you are already unhappy, money does almost nothing past a certain point. There is a ceiling, but the ceiling is not about income. It is about the underlying state of the person collecting it. The deeper insight in Killingsworth's original research, the one almost nobody talks about, is the part that should sit with you longer than the income numbers. The Track Your Happiness app had been telling him for years that the single biggest predictor of in-the-moment well-being is not money at all. It is whether your mind is on the thing you are doing. His most cited paper, written with Daniel Gilbert at Harvard, is titled A Wandering Mind Is an Unhappy Mind. The data from the app showed that people are mentally absent from what they are doing 47 percent of the time, and that mental absence is one of the strongest predictors of unhappiness in the entire dataset. More predictive than income. More predictive than the activity itself. More predictive than almost any demographic variable you could measure. Which means the unhappy 20 percent that Kahneman's plateau actually described were probably not unhappy because they did not have enough money. They were unhappy for reasons that more money could not reach. The reason the curve flattened for them at $100,000 a year is the same reason it would have flattened at $300,000 or $700,000. The thing they were missing was not buyable. The most uncomfortable line in the entire 2023 paper is the one that nobody on the internet quotes. The authors note that the relationship between income and happiness, while real, is much weaker than the relationship between attention and happiness. A person earning $40,000 who is fully present in their own life will, on average, report higher in-the-moment well-being than a person earning $400,000 whose mind is somewhere else. The fight about money was the wrong fight the entire time. The two researchers spent 13 years arguing over whether the dollar ceiling was at $75,000 or $500,000, and the data from Killingsworth's own app was sitting there the whole time saying the ceiling was not about dollars at all. The ceiling is whether you can hold your attention on the life you actually have. You can run the experiment yourself the next time you catch your mind drifting. Stop. Put your phone down. Look at the room you are in, the person across from you, the food in front of you, the work you are actually doing. That is the part the apps cannot sell you and the salary cannot buy you. The data has been clear for over a decade. The plateau is not in your bank account. It is in your attention.
Ihtesham Ali tweet media
English
56
466
1.6K
306.2K
Bea Policarpio 🇵🇭 retweetledi
Mark Manson
Mark Manson@Markmanson·
”Your goal is not to find love but to remove all barriers which are preventing you from receiving it." — Rumi
English
69
123
1.1K
28.5K
Bea Policarpio 🇵🇭 retweetledi
The Secret
The Secret@thesecret·
Every day without fail, write a hundred things you are grateful for. If you do this every day, you will transform your life.
English
20
121
1.2K
22.3K
Bea Policarpio 🇵🇭 retweetledi
Robert Greene
Robert Greene@RobertGreene·
The worst kind of people is anyone who’s insecure.
English
42
184
1.4K
60.9K
Bea Policarpio 🇵🇭 retweetledi
hopecore
hopecore@dailyhopecores·
hopecore tweet media
ZXX
82
11.5K
62.6K
785K
Bea Policarpio 🇵🇭 retweetledi
Daily Stoic
Daily Stoic@dailystoic·
Daily Stoic tweet media
ZXX
10
52
436
19.2K
Bea Policarpio 🇵🇭 retweetledi
Robert Greene
Robert Greene@RobertGreene·
Your mind is the starting point of all war and all strategy. A mind that is easily overwhelmed by emotion, that is rooted in the past instead of the present, that cannot see the world with clarity and urgency, will create strategies that will always miss the mark.
English
60
306
1.9K
46.3K
Bea Policarpio 🇵🇭 retweetledi
The Secret
The Secret@thesecret·
Every good thought you think, good word you speak, and act of kindness you perform lifts the frequency of your being to new heights.
English
18
226
1.5K
23.4K
Bea Policarpio 🇵🇭 retweetledi
Sahil Bloom
Sahil Bloom@SahilBloom·
A mentor once told me this: Just be unapologetically yourself. The moment you start filtering yourself to be liked is the moment you start attracting relationships that need constant maintenance. Do you. The right ones will stick, the wrong ones will walk. That’s a blessing.
English
129
536
4.3K
98.1K
Bea Policarpio 🇵🇭 retweetledi
Sahil Bloom
Sahil Bloom@SahilBloom·
Major cheat code for life: Master the art of the fresh start. From a bad morning. From a bad interaction. From a missed workout. From a poor decision. The goal isn't to avoid the fall. It's to shorten the time between the fall and the reset. Fast recovery compounds.
English
186
2.6K
14.8K
240K
Bea Policarpio 🇵🇭 retweetledi
Robert Greene
Robert Greene@RobertGreene·
All successful people I’ve met and interviewed have been internally motivated not externally motivated. What keeps you internally motivated? 👇🏼
English
22
102
819
29.6K
Bea Policarpio 🇵🇭 retweetledi
Dalai Lama
Dalai Lama@DalaiLama·
I use the words physical hygiene and emotional hygiene. We should pay equally important attention to the hygiene of our emotions. Physical hygiene keeps us physically fit — but full of anger, what use is that? Real hygiene is emotional: peaceful, compassionate emotion. That is the real inner hygiene.
English
137
550
3K
160.6K
Bea Policarpio 🇵🇭 retweetledi
Astro Poets
Astro Poets@poetastrologers·
Gemini season
Astro Poets tweet media
Indonesia
1
59
304
12.1K
Bea Policarpio 🇵🇭 retweetledi
Adam Grant
Adam Grant@AdamMGrant·
A telltale sign of an ignorant leader is failing to read books. Fiction builds empathy and imagination. Nonfiction boosts concentration and critical thinking. Not reading fuels mental stagnation. Leaders who “don't have time to read” are leaders who don't make time to learn.
English
52
282
1.2K
60K
Bea Policarpio 🇵🇭
Bea Policarpio 🇵🇭@beapolicarpio·
Today, let us remember that our words hold power. And as the classic saying goes, with great power comes great responsibility.
English
0
0
0
11
Bea Policarpio 🇵🇭 retweetledi
Mark Manson
Mark Manson@Markmanson·
If you aren’t naturally tired at night and excited in the morning, then you probably haven’t found something meaningful to work on.
English
113
184
2.2K
50.7K