bees

@Grossmanite @FlairTwenty @AaronBastani No, that's a socialist cope to pretend that's it's just "capitalism+". Fascism both privatized and nationalized in accordance with what they viewed as most advantageous to the state

@FlairTwenty @AaronBastani Aren't fascist economies virtually entirely privatised, with the state playing a much stronger role in overseeing and defending and directing them? Whereas China still has a lot of state *ownership*

Every business with more than 9 employees has a party cell.

@CentrumLibertas @paulmyass @ren_takahas @bunburyoudoujp Mongols ate horse, it's also still a commonly eaten animal across the world, including countries undoubtedly first world

@beemachine200 @paulmyass @ren_takahas @bunburyoudoujp To quite literally having very few other options available to them. 2000BC and beyond, civilizations like the Greeks, Roman's, Mongols, etc all used Horses as a companion esk partnership, using them to help hunt, transport goods, and conduct warfare

Why leave out the horse?

@CentrumLibertas @paulmyass @ren_takahas @bunburyoudoujp Horse as food is fairly common in western civilization, just look at central Europe. Anglo is not the end all be all of the west. Also I'm a weeb so I don't care I love 馬刺

@beemachine200 @paulmyass @ren_takahas @bunburyoudoujp Horses were a core need for Human transportation, Combat, travel, and other means. Now they are used primarily for travel without gas expenses for farmers, Amish, or used in things such as Horse racing. Horse as a FOOD is extremely uncommon especially in western civilization

@CentrumLibertas @paulmyass @ren_takahas @bunburyoudoujp And especially not comparable to another human

@CentrumLibertas @paulmyass @ren_takahas @bunburyoudoujp Horses were literally bred for food. Their entire purpose was that they were more suitable livestock among the steppes than cattle were, and the Indo Europeans later realized they could ride them. Even longer than they've been a friend theyve been food. Not comparable to a dog

@paulmyass @CentrumLibertas @ren_takahas @bunburyoudoujp Dogs still have had a longtime use for guarding livestock against predators and combat against other humans. But horses are definitely a valid food animal they taste very good

@CentrumLibertas @ren_takahas @bunburyoudoujp Cows helped labour far more then all horses combined. Dogs weren't useful to civilization since Neolithic, outside of games for arisistocrats, because we haven't subsisted on hunting for millenia

@SirCumference98 @tiredhungryangr @EllieGabalus They just sucked at it

@SirCumference98 @tiredhungryangr @EllieGabalus That population of Argentines on the island was small, short lived, and also came after populations of British and Spanish settlers, so the Argentine idea that they were indigenous people stripped of land they were at first is BS, they were, like the British, also colonizers,

The actual Marxist position on the Falklands

@Doomerzoomer @thomasunise At the time of me writing this, your comment here got over 10x the amount of veiws as the average post from that influencer. Phoebe was completely correct to turn $4k for that deal down

@thomasunise I mean sure but if your father is a billionaire maybe haggling on the internet with someone who can screenshot your entire conversation isn’t the smartest business decision in life

> Be Phoebe Gates > Bill Gates daughter btw > 23 years old > Stanford grad > Co-found Phia AI fashion shopping app > Raise $35 million Series A round > $185 million valuation as an "early stage startup" > DM influencers to promote your product > They say $4,000 for TikTok + Reel + Story cross post > "Perfect let me come back" > "Unfortunately this is just super out of budget for us right now" > "something around the $400 range works." Her dad is worth $130 billion.

@ahh1l @Kuroiya1 @SkinnyTuna This whole thread is about a blanket statement

@beemachine200 @Kuroiya1 @SkinnyTuna As a blanket statement thats stupid because blanket statements are generalizations which exclude rare exceptions not focus on them. Would it be true? Technically I guess, maybe. Does that prove anything in the context of this discussion? No lol.

native english speakers get so mad when you tell them “a couple” means 2 or 3

@Echoochoomander @ahh1l @Kuroiya1 @SkinnyTuna All those contexts usually refer to an intended two, it's not uncommon to bring it up if you end up doing more. Very funny that ESL Europeans are arrogant enough to think they know a language better than it's native speakers

@beemachine200 @ahh1l @Kuroiya1 @SkinnyTuna "Eat a couple of snacks" "Drink a couple beers" "Check out a couple stores" This shit never means "exactly 2" outside of calling a relationship a couple lmao.

@ahh1l @Kuroiya1 @SkinnyTuna Would a blanket statement that 5 doesn't mean 5 be true then because in certain context the meaning changes?

@beemachine200 @Kuroiya1 @SkinnyTuna In that context, but not in other contexts. Thats how context works. This isn't that hard to understand, jesus christ

@ahh1l @Kuroiya1 @SkinnyTuna So does 5 also mean 7? Because it works the same way in that context

@beemachine200 @Kuroiya1 @SkinnyTuna yeah its almost as if context affects the meaning of the word, crazy huh

@ahh1l @SkinnyTuna That certain amount is one. That is exactly how language works, words have certain meanings

@SkinnyTuna people in the comments acting like the distinction between "a couple" and "a few" is numerical, as if at a certain ammount "a couple" becomes "a few". You fucking retards lmao, thats not how language works.

@ahh1l @Kuroiya1 @SkinnyTuna That's quite obviously different, "I'll be there in ___" almost never means an exact time

@Kuroiya1 @SkinnyTuna Yeah if someone tells me "i'll be there in a couple of minutes" I always assume they mean exactly two

@SkinnyTuna Yeah yeah yeah I'm still not opening up my relationship

@AlpacaAurelius No horse is cringe

I draw the line right here. Thanks for asking PETA

@xie_uh @spandrell4 @GearoidReidy Wealth equality lol

@spandrell4 @GearoidReidy Name a single, meaningful(not anime or hentai), realm in which Japan outperforms China...?

The *one* thing?!

@Angela76985572 @DoomerCoomer Aside from the fact that while yes, many Argentines have indigenous blood they're primarily descended from colonists, he was specifically stating that immigrants count as indigenous. This is not a translation error or me calling Argentines all immigrants, as ridiculous as it is,

@beemachine200 @DoomerCoomer Somos descendientes de indigenas. Qué tiene que ver nuestra sangre con que ustedes robaron un territorio que nos pertenece?

me: actually i think the british finding the uninhabited falklands and living there isn't colonialism, for once juan pedro gonzales esmarelda gomez de la rosa romero 🇦🇷: you will never be native to the americas