💾💜 #Digital ⚓️ #Vagabond 💜💾

The year is 2035. The #digipres community has invented record keeping and information records management. The cycle is nearly complete. Archival theory will be with us by 2040. #Archives #InformationRecordsManagement #GovtRecords #GovtRecordkeeping #Policy #DigitalStrategy

@matteusbeus While it is still cool in the morning (or late in the evening as the temperature drops) try this for 5-10 minutes with all windows open and all doors open enabling air to move about. It should make things more comfortable. allaboutberlin.com/glossary/Sto%C…

Anyone who thinks this is lovely UK weather should try living in a flat that won't drop below 32c 😅

@WiemanJames @NotHoodlum I didn't say anything about Trump... I said release the Epstein files (complete and serving politicians unredacted)

@beet_keeper @NotHoodlum Get some new material, clown boy. For the one millionth time, loser, if there was anything incriminating to Trump in the Epstein Files, Merrick Garland would have run it up the flagpole before the election to help the moron you voted for. Get some help for your TDS.

Look at this slop job. The only reflecting that should be done here is why 77 million Americans voted for the return of this insane maniac.

@BlkBirdBye @Victori83525871 @alluringmedia @PeterHadIt 4 times!

@Victori83525871 @alluringmedia @PeterHadIt Elon had cervical surgery?

Take it from me, as someone who did COPIOUS amounts of Ketamine in my 20s, that is not all he is on.

@WiemanJames @NotHoodlum For your next trick, release the Epstein files!

@NotHoodlum You communist fuqtards weren’t even aware of what the Reflecting Pool looked like after the Obama morons spent $34 MILLION DOLLARS to have it end up looking like this. But now that President Trump is fixing it for 10% of what the Kenyan clown spent, your panties are in a wad. GFY

@AmeriqueJohnny @NotHoodlum Breathing your own leader's farts is literally a mental disorder... there WAS NO DISREPAIR no one had a reason to give a shit about these monuments, they were fine. Meanwhile your Epstein files are still to be released. Ask for them!

Me and every other sane person in America: “The TDS-addled libtards couldn’t possibly get any crazier, surely they’re at peak insanity.” Libtards with Stage IV TDS: “OMG Trump is having them repaint an iconic national monument which had fallen into disrepair!!! This is literally Nazism!!! [loud screeching noises]”

@Keir_Starmer @PGAChampionship "british"

History maker! Congratulations Aaron Rai on your extraordinary win at the @PGAChampionship, the first English golfer to win for 107 years. bbc.co.uk/sport/golf/art…

@presence2222 @dioscuri OMG bro! You WROTE THIS WITH AI AI is the fucking gpats ASS No one is misattributing anything here except anyone who thinks this was a legit experiment with art critics/historians that would even know... Oh and maybe know the piece IN PERSON.... f*n AI-bros

Many people don't evaluate the object itself, but rather the social context of the object. When something is framed as "merely AI," many actively search for emptiness instead of expression, coherence, or distinctiveness. They read into it a lack and then mistake this reading for insight.

This user posted an actual Monet, said it was AI, asked people to explain what made it inferior. They obliged 😂 Tracks with research showing people systematically downgrade their aesthetic assessments of art when told it’s AI-generated. See — nature.com/articles/s4159…

@TheRauyne @SwordsaintPress @dioscuri yes... but also no... because in no way did the original people replying know art... like... even AT ALL

@SwordsaintPress @dioscuri This is the furthest thing away from a good thing. It shows exactly how forced the AI hate is and how so many people do not even know the Art they're trying to defend.

@RyanPMcGowan @SwordsaintPress @dioscuri not a thing

@SwordsaintPress @dioscuri A large chunk of people falsely shit on another person's real work because somebody lied about it being AI. This is not a good thing.

@stillnesshum @TGT_OAR @dioscuri It's literally life-size, about 7ft by 3ft in tryptich... and bro, you're not getting close enough to see "mistakes and uncertainties" that's a trope if ever I heard one...

Some of Monet’s water lily paintings are larger than life size. To me specifically when the size is this overwhelming, I focus on more minute details such as how paints are applied, how deliberate the brush strokes, and even where the mistakes and uncertainties are. With AI generated art, it can to so precise that the whimsicals are lost..

@stillnesshum @dioscuri Your response is literally AI bro... do you have eyes?

I have learnt to appreciate some AI generated art. Took a while. It’s difficult because with paintings it’s more than just colours, composition. It’s how the paints are applied when you examine up close. The deliberate thickness.. its 3D effect is not duplicatable up-close. The real test for me is to see life size AI created art on a wall up-close. I imagine it would look like prints.. very fine prints. Art, yes. But not a painting. Not a Monet.. not those water lilies..

@charliwtquirks @dioscuri I love that Ai book "Pride and Prejudice" I'm just so annoyed it was so good and took so long to be recognized as so because it was so good. (Oh wait, it wasn't AI and wasn't the bare-ass averaging of statistics text that I thought it was)

@dioscuri Honestly this is so stupid. I see it a lot with writers. There’s thousands of garbage books written entirely by humans. There’s also loads of great books. Some writers use AI and don’t say it. But when someone does they get crucified. It’s beyond idiotic

@Tasnek @dioscuri You are an absolute dumb ass You have read the results of an absolutely meaningless Twitter "poll" and said "yes!" "this resonates" at what point did you discount any user who genuinely could differentiate a Monet from slop? or just realize you're on Twitter... 🖕

@dioscuri This reminds me of that experiment where wine afficionados were told they were given two different wines and to rate which was better, but it was the same wine in two bottles and one bottle looked fancier. The "afficionados" scored the fancy-bottle wine higher across the board.

insider - 'someone who has studied art and art history'. does not exclude others, it just means they have qualified as experts and you/we are still learning the ropes...

Minneapolis Arts are retweeting this nonsense. No genuine art critic/historian discounted an original Monet. What are people trying to prove here? - AI art is at a disadvantage (yes 100%) - You will discount a real artist's work if you call it AI? (no 💯 if you're an insider)

And to be clear... the minimum, educated response to the conceit would be "right-click > search with google lens > results..." and EVERYONE would know its a genuine patch from an original image.

So the AI propaganda machine is now trying to pretend that it's anti but (if you think about it hard enough) pro AI... yet... the responses to a "literal Monet" are very obviously all non art historians (likely AI)... the #gaslighting never ends #NoAI

@Jediwolf @psych_nft no mate, they're bots... (or really really bad want to be art historians)... but they're not serious people as they say.

@psych_nft I actually did a bit of extra work and checked the profiles before including them in the collage and posting it. I did my best to exclude bots etc. so I’d say it’s fairly accurate. I believe that’s one of the reasons why it resonated so much.

All “social experiments” on current platforms are poisoned to the point of irrelevance by the endless replybot automations and monetization. I suspect only X itself can give access to the pure stream of real data/opinions with slop account interference cleaned out.

@JonathanPieNews Honestly, its as much a smell he grabbed five mil for completing his life's work and still won't quit...

I thought it was for his 'personal security'? That's the problem when you lie so much. You forget whatever bollocks you said in the past.

@anishgiri I thought you were chess [dot] com?

Went to an Indian restaurant in Bucharest. Waiter saw me with the lichess app. Said he is very good at this game and can for sure beat me. Claims to have "two thousand rating". What do I do?