Bear of Wall Street

My favourite top 5 trading books: 1. Think and Trade Like a Champion 2. Trading Pyschology 2.0 3. Short-selling with the O'Neil Disciples 4. Insider Buy Superstocks 5. How to Trade in Stocks

@LifeMathMoney Seen a lot of people watch full dramas written by AI on YouTube and Tiktok. So yes, people will still buy they don't care who wrote it, only if it's good or not.

If Harry Potter was written by AI But it was the same book and just as entertaining Would people still buy and read it? Questions for Plato

@Patrickwieland Based on two evidence presented, answer is yes.

On a hot date should I tell her I’m the biggest and the largest DayTrader on YouTube!?

@BlueGr33n13 @RealJessica All governments lie, cheat and steal whatever they can get away with. If you think your "democratic" governments are upright with good morals and do its best for its citizens and the world, God bless your naive soul.

@RealJessica 🙄 it's like the CCP infiltrated governments in the West so they could have an advantage.....heaven knows communists can't get ahead without lieing, cheating, and stealing...and flooding your country with 3rd world trash

Thank you Germany 🇩🇪and Britain 🇬🇧 for sacrificing your economies to save the planet. China appreciates you exporting your manufacturing to provide jobs for their citizens.

@urmom_eth @VitoComedy No way I'm using a finger. A tree branch or spoon maybe

@VitoComedy everybody knows you gotta stick a finger in the dogs ass for him to let go here's a demo i did last year

Bro how are these adults so useless? Get down there and bash the thing's head in with a rock.

@hamza_xau @kadir_xau EBOOK

Serious message for everyone who is struggling with trading at the moment! I am going to tell you a little bit about my journey and maybe you can take some lessons from this. I started trading together with my brother @kadir_xau during March 2020. We were like sponges. We learned so many strategies in no time. The community we were in (MLM) couldn‘t believe that we could even trade. Most of them just cared about selling the product. We were dedicated to the charts. Everyday 16 hours! Live chart time + Backtesting. We learned two strategies back then, Elliot wave & Heikin Ashi Candles. We mastered it, but the winrate was way too low. Like 20%. (Maybe less) You had to really hold trades so it was no where profitable. Only hindsight stuff. After that we just focused on Price Action. We digested every single candle. We just experienced how the candles formed and gained so much from that. (Members in the Live Session witnessed our accuracy on M1 Timeframe for months.) After 2 years @kadir_xau came up with our holy grail: the Manipulation Candle. It took us soo much time to perfect the edge to a point where a whole playbook & strategy evolved from that. We already knew liquidity and imbalances (FVG) back then and we added the Manipulation Candle to that. And it worked wonders. After years of executing on the same exact setup with small nuances we felt like we found the holy grail to trading Gold. Strategy ✅ Then Risk & Trade management became the second step. We backtested all of our trades and journaled everything. And we saw that 1:2RR has the highest Winrate + Reward combined. Yes sometimes the trades go for much more than that, but the probability was not high enough to hold every single trade to 10R. We adapted the strategy from M1 entries to M5 & M15 entries. This way the winrate got close to 85% with 2RR. + Mental Capital wasn‘t drained Because if the stop loss gets hit the whole idea is invalid. You won‘t see our trades hitting SL and going in that direction again. Max Losing Streak until today is 4. Risk & Trade Management ✅ Only remaining aspect was the psychology. The mastery of trading psychology comed through confidence in the edge you have. We have data of 1.000s of trades. And we know what Winrate and RR we will average a month. So the outcome of 1 single trade doesn‘t mean anything. Yes the probability is very high, but that doesn‘t mean you can overrisk on every single trade, because we also have the data on the max losing streak (4). This way you are forced to manage your risk and also not marry your trade idea. So the mental aspect of trading became strong through the data-backed proven strategy. Psychology ✅ Take this however you want. Make the weekends count. Don‘t be a fool. Trading is a blessing, but a nightmare until you find profitability. Comment "EBOOK" to receive my 36-page strategy e-book for FREE! 👇

@dontbsalti I'm the second guy but I can hunt cockroaches around my house

@tradeifycrypto Hey

gTradeify! The reply that gets 0 likes receives a 100K 2-Step Account. Winner announced in 24 hours. 😉

@ntgbutlight @Vibelawyer @AutismCapital @thechosenberg No I am not

@Vibelawyer @bigbadtrader @AutismCapital @thechosenberg you're a muslim, are you not? 😂😂

Is this is a racism bait post or is India really like this

@ntgbutlight @Vibelawyer @AutismCapital @thechosenberg How unoriginal. You and your kind always comeback using bots, AI and other such low level drivel.

@Vibelawyer @bigbadtrader @AutismCapital @thechosenberg yeah, because there is such eloquence in two chinese bots jacking each other off on X.

@Vibelawyer @ntgbutlight @AutismCapital @thechosenberg I admire how you calmly handle that idiot that is flaming you every chance he got. Such low iq trolls don't deserve such eloquence.

@ntgbutlight @AutismCapital @thechosenberg If you have the time and interest this is probably the best way to learn about the topic. youtu.be/1LAUkTtxoFs?si…

@ajtradinglucid @ecptrds @TradingLucid 😂😂😂 Great reply

@ecptrds @TradingLucid Our support is not slow. We reviewed your case, but you didn't like the answer so you've been spamming tickets. You are in a special inbox called "The Dungeon." Rest assured, the team periodically checks in on you, just in case you do have an issue that actually requires a fix.

@dontbsalti Do it. You can respawn later if anything goes wrong

Should I risk my life and ride this today for the lore ???

@SarthakRai80090 @adammahardhika @narendramodi That is clearly Indian anyone with at least an eye can see that

@adammahardhika @narendramodi This is a fake clip in this video man is thai buddhist not indiaan

Thank you, my friend, Prime Minister Netanyahu. I fully agree with you on the bond between India and Israel as well as the diverse nature of our bilateral relations. India deeply values the enduring friendship with Israel, built on trust, innovation and a shared commitment to peace and progress. Looking forward to our discussions during my upcoming Israel visit. @netanyahu

@kav3rnus @EthanLMiller @Mr_Husky1 Lawsuit can only be won if the said booby trap causes bodily harm or injury, one of the four elements of a booby trap legal definition.

@EthanLMiller @Mr_Husky1 Booby-trapping is illegal in all 50 states. Lawsuit won.

To whoever thought it would be funny to fill the package on their porch with EXPIRED MILK, I’ve already contacted the police. I opened what looked like a normal package in my car and it exploded. Rotten milk all over my seats, carpet, clothes, door panels. The smell hit instantly. Absolutely foul. This wasn’t a harmless prank. This was deliberate property damage. Expired milk doesn’t just “air out.” It soaks in. It curdles. It stains. It lingers. Now my car smells like a dairy farm dumpster in July and I can’t even drive it without gagging. So yes, someone is going to be paying for professional detailing and any damages, because I refuse to live with sour milk baked into my interior. Hope the five seconds of laughter was worth it.

You are watching your chart right now. Not because your system told you to. Because you need to know if this trade is going to work. You checked five minutes ago. You will check again in five minutes. Each time you look, you feel a small hit of relief — or a small spike of fear. And each time, you are teaching yourself the same lesson: This one trade matters enough to watch. It doesn't. But you can't feel that yet. And that is the real problem. The watching is not neutral. It is not "staying informed." It is not "being responsible." Every glance at the screen is a repetition. And what you are repeating is the belief that the outcome of this single trade has the power to change something meaningful about your account, your system, or your future. It doesn't. One trade inside a tested system is a rounding error. It is one row in a spreadsheet that will eventually contain thousands. The outcome of this row will not determine whether the system works. It was never going to. But your brain doesn't know that. Your brain watches the price tick by tick and builds a story. It watches the candle turn red and says: something is going wrong. It watches the candle turn green and says: I knew this would work. Neither of those sentences is true. Both of them feel true. And every time you check the chart, you give your brain another chance to write another story about a data point that means nothing. This is how anxiety is built. Not by the market. By repetition. Every look is a rep. Every rep strengthens the belief that this trade matters. And the stronger that belief gets, the harder it becomes to sit still, follow the plan, and let the system work. You think you are watching the chart to calm yourself down. You are doing the opposite. Now here is the part no one talks about. The reason you can't stop watching is not a discipline problem. It is not a screen addiction. It is not a personality flaw. It is a preparation problem. You are watching because somewhere inside, you are not sure this trade should exist. Maybe you don't fully trust the system — because you didn't test it across a large enough sample to see everything it can produce. Maybe you don't trust the position size — because you calculated it from how much you want to make, not from what your tested data says you can safely risk. Maybe you don't trust the stop — because you have never sat inside this exact drawdown with your own hands enough times to know it is normal. Maybe you don't trust any of it — because the entire system was built on theory you read, not experience you lived. A trader who has tested a system across a massive sample, practiced it until the worst stretch felt like nothing, and sized the position from the data — that trader is not watching the chart. Not because they are disciplined. Because there is nothing to watch. The outcome of this trade was already accounted for before they clicked. The drawdown was already survived in testing. The position size was already proven to be something the account can absorb without damage. There is nothing left to be afraid of. So there is nothing left to watch. The watching stops when the preparation is complete. Not before. If you are still glued to the screen after every entry, don't try to fix the watching. Fix what is underneath it. Test the system until you have seen its worst with your own eyes. Practice until the execution requires no thought. Size your position from the data, not from your desires. When the preparation is real, the screen loses its power. You won't have to force yourself to stop watching. You will forget to check. The books go deeper 📚 — new title added payhip.com/YumiSakura/col…

You just had your best week in months. Four wins in a row. Everything you touched worked. And somewhere in the back of your mind, a quiet voice started whispering: "I'm finally getting good at this." That voice is the most dangerous thing in your trading right now. Not because it's wrong to feel confidence. But because what you're feeling isn't confidence. It's attribution error. You are taking credit for what probability gave you. Your system produced a cluster of wins. That cluster was always inside your distribution. It was coming whether you were focused or distracted, disciplined or sloppy. The wins didn't arrive because you got better. They arrived because that's what a sample does — it clusters. But your brain doesn't see clusters. Your brain sees a story. And the story it's telling you right now is: "Something changed. I figured it out. I can push harder." Here's what happens next. You start sizing up. Not because your system's data says you should. Because you feel like you can handle it. You start taking setups that almost meet your criteria. Not because your rules changed. Because you feel like your judgment is sharp enough to make exceptions. You stop checking whether you followed your own rules. Not because the rules stopped mattering. Because when everything is working, who bothers to check? You don't notice any of this while it's happening. It feels like growth. It feels like progress. It feels like you're finally becoming the trader you were meant to be. And then the losing streak arrives. Not an unusual one. The same streak your system has always produced. The same drawdown that was sitting inside your data all along. But now you're oversized. Now you've been taking B-grade setups. Now you haven't confirmed whether a single trade this week actually followed your rules. And the drawdown that your system was designed to survive — the one that was never supposed to be a problem — becomes the thing that breaks you. Not because the system failed. Because you left the system three wins ago and didn't notice. This is how most traders blow up. Not during losing streaks. During winning streaks. The losing streak is just when the invoice arrives. A pilot doesn't fly faster after three smooth landings. The approach speed is the approach speed — calculated from the aircraft's weight and the runway length, not from how the last few flights felt. Three smooth landings don't change the physics. Three winning trades don't change your system's parameters. If your position size isn't derived from your tested data, it shouldn't move. If your entry criteria aren't met, the trade doesn't exist. If you have a process for confirming you followed your rules, you run it — especially when you feel like you don't need to. The moment you treat a winning streak as evidence that you've improved is the moment you've left the system. And you won't realize it until the drawdown shows you exactly how far you drifted. The best traders I've observed don't tighten up after a winning streak. They don't need to. They don't even know they're on one. They aren't counting. Not because they're ignoring results. Because individual results stopped meaning anything to them a long time ago. A win is a filled row in a spreadsheet. A loss is the next row. Four wins in a row is not a streak — it's Tuesday. If you still know your win count this week, you are still assigning meaning to short-term results. And if short-term results still carry meaning, they still carry power — the power to make you size up, bend your rules, and drift without noticing. The work isn't learning to resist that power. The work is reaching the point where it no longer exists. Stay the same risk. Follow the same rules. Run the same process. Especially when you feel like you don't need to. That's not discipline. That's the job. The books go deeper 📚 payhip.com/YumiSakura/col…

@Puzhankara84575 @darab_farooqui It's impossible for her to order vegetarian burger as there's no such burger on menu in McD Malaysia.

@darab_farooqui Darab Farooqui, Please do NOT CHANGE the NARRATIVE. She Ordered Vegetarian Burger. They SERVED her Beef Burger. She was JUSTIFIABLY UPSET. How would you Feel if you were SERVED Pork Burger after having ordered Beef Burger. You should Put yourself in her shoes before you CONDEMN.

This happened three months ago in November. 1. As a tourist, she did not research local menus and cultural conventions, resulting in assumptions based on home standards, such as the differences between McDonald's in India and Malaysia. So, whose fault is that? It was entirely her own fault. 2. She then said, "I'm from India". As if all Indians are vegetarians, ignoring the country's varied dietary habits across regions and communities. Does she truly believe that being a pure vegetarian is an Indian national identity? 3. She is also a casteist because she confused vegetarian for 'pure vegetarian'. The word "pure vegetarian" has casteist connotations of ritual purity, particularly associated with upper-caste Hindu or Jain practices, separating it from conventional vegetarianism. 4. Finally, her public meltdown, such as crying and shouting over an incident that is 'purely' (like pure vegetarian), her. We can understand her shock. However, her reaction is similar to "Dharm Bhrasht hona," which is incredibly casteist and regressive.

@NurfikriFahmi @cekti_hq @coolservant Bagi Kristian, org bukan seagama adalah "infidel" = kafir jadi sama je jadi Muslim juga kafir bagi org Kristian

@cekti_hq @coolservant Kafir itu bermaksud orang yang bukan beragama Islam. Sama saja macam non-Muslim. Tiada beza. Haram = Non Halal. Tiada beza. Tak perlu bagi orang bukan Islam untuk triggered. Istilah bahasa saja. Kalau tak mahu dipanggil kafir, jadilah Muslim.

The average man doesn’t try very hard. So if you try very hard, it’s impossible to be average.

@eleanorzjames @Sargon_of_Akkad Maybe to her an honest open relationship is her ideal

@Sargon_of_Akkad I’m wondering why she tells them she’s had 58 previous partners. 🤷🏻‍♀️

The question we must ask young women is this: who told you it was acceptable to have a high body count? That person has ruined your life and dating prospects. You should be angry with them and ensure future generations of women are not deceived by them as you were.