k.

Introducing Breakout. Fantasy sports engineered for those who demand more. Our first release is the NBA Draftroom: the drafting home to mock, prepare, and make decisions before the fantasy season starts. Coming August 17.

Knicks fans are insane 😭😭😭 “My Mayor is Muslim, my bagel is Jewish, my Christian’s Dior… Knicks in 4!!!”

Introducing Breakout. Fantasy sports engineered for those who demand more. Our first release is the NBA Draftroom: the drafting home to mock, prepare, and make decisions before the fantasy season starts. Coming August 17.

Can Wemby/Spurs turn OKC's normal possessions into worse shots without needing OKC to fully fall apart? Game 1 leaned yes, but not cleanly. Wemby/Spurs did turn OKC’s normal possessions into worse shots. OKC got to 115, but it took 2OT, 101 shots, and a Caruso heater. OKC went 17/45 from 3. Caruso: 8/14 Rest of OKC: 9/31 So the 3P% hides how uncomfortable the offense actually looked. Shai went 7/23. Chet went 2/7. The reported Chet/Wemby matchup stat is even more stark: Chet has made 1 shot when guarded by Wemby this season. The caveat is San Antonio’s turnovers. They won the glass and made OKC uncomfortable, but 21 turnovers is not a clean repeatable formula.

OKC-Spurs has Finals level attention for obvious reasons: - 64-win defending champ vs 62-win challenger - Shai vs Wemby - probably the first real playoff checkpoint of Wembanyama’s career arc quick pre-game 1 breakdown of the series math: OKC’s playoff profile is built on elite shot quality, low turnovers, and repeatable shot creation. the Spurs case is that Wemby is one of the few defensive variables who can turn OKC’s normal possessions into worse shots without needing a huge turnover edge. the playoff numbers favour OKC: better offense, better shot quality, fewer turnovers, stronger decision-making. the H2H numbers make it more interesting: San Antonio held OKC well below its normal efficiency, but did it without forcing OKC into a messy turnover game. 1/

OKC-Spurs has Finals level attention for obvious reasons: - 64-win defending champ vs 62-win challenger - Shai vs Wemby - probably the first real playoff checkpoint of Wembanyama’s career arc quick pre-game 1 breakdown of the series math: OKC’s playoff profile is built on elite shot quality, low turnovers, and repeatable shot creation. the Spurs case is that Wemby is one of the few defensive variables who can turn OKC’s normal possessions into worse shots without needing a huge turnover edge. the playoff numbers favour OKC: better offense, better shot quality, fewer turnovers, stronger decision-making. the H2H numbers make it more interesting: San Antonio held OKC well below its normal efficiency, but did it without forcing OKC into a messy turnover game. 1/

OKC-Spurs has Finals level attention for obvious reasons: - 64-win defending champ vs 62-win challenger - Shai vs Wemby - probably the first real playoff checkpoint of Wembanyama’s career arc quick pre-game 1 breakdown of the series math: OKC’s playoff profile is built on elite shot quality, low turnovers, and repeatable shot creation. the Spurs case is that Wemby is one of the few defensive variables who can turn OKC’s normal possessions into worse shots without needing a huge turnover edge. the playoff numbers favour OKC: better offense, better shot quality, fewer turnovers, stronger decision-making. the H2H numbers make it more interesting: San Antonio held OKC well below its normal efficiency, but did it without forcing OKC into a messy turnover game. 1/

OKC-Spurs has Finals level attention for obvious reasons: - 64-win defending champ vs 62-win challenger - Shai vs Wemby - probably the first real playoff checkpoint of Wembanyama’s career arc quick pre-game 1 breakdown of the series math: OKC’s playoff profile is built on elite shot quality, low turnovers, and repeatable shot creation. the Spurs case is that Wemby is one of the few defensive variables who can turn OKC’s normal possessions into worse shots without needing a huge turnover edge. the playoff numbers favour OKC: better offense, better shot quality, fewer turnovers, stronger decision-making. the H2H numbers make it more interesting: San Antonio held OKC well below its normal efficiency, but did it without forcing OKC into a messy turnover game. 1/

OKC-Spurs has Finals level attention for obvious reasons: - 64-win defending champ vs 62-win challenger - Shai vs Wemby - probably the first real playoff checkpoint of Wembanyama’s career arc quick pre-game 1 breakdown of the series math: OKC’s playoff profile is built on elite shot quality, low turnovers, and repeatable shot creation. the Spurs case is that Wemby is one of the few defensive variables who can turn OKC’s normal possessions into worse shots without needing a huge turnover edge. the playoff numbers favour OKC: better offense, better shot quality, fewer turnovers, stronger decision-making. the H2H numbers make it more interesting: San Antonio held OKC well below its normal efficiency, but did it without forcing OKC into a messy turnover game. 1/

OKC-Spurs has Finals level attention for obvious reasons: - 64-win defending champ vs 62-win challenger - Shai vs Wemby - probably the first real playoff checkpoint of Wembanyama’s career arc quick pre-game 1 breakdown of the series math: OKC’s playoff profile is built on elite shot quality, low turnovers, and repeatable shot creation. the Spurs case is that Wemby is one of the few defensive variables who can turn OKC’s normal possessions into worse shots without needing a huge turnover edge. the playoff numbers favour OKC: better offense, better shot quality, fewer turnovers, stronger decision-making. the H2H numbers make it more interesting: San Antonio held OKC well below its normal efficiency, but did it without forcing OKC into a messy turnover game. 1/