Billy45632🐀

Fucking finally

@Jucktqel @Muted_Radio @HalcyonHypnotic Vote Red Netanyahu is ruler of the world and kills all blue. Vote Blue nothing happens.

@Muted_Radio @billy45632 @HalcyonHypnotic If it was inherently flawed you wouldn’t have to change the entire premise, the scenario is „someone will inevitably press blue, do i risk my life in order to save everyone or do i save myself at the cost of putting others in risk

Blue - Maybe die Red - nothing happens “Choose blue because some people are too brain dead to choose red” > are we serious right now…

@crazypuce @noahmc29 @rockinredeemer @HalcyonHypnotic If you consider loss of honor not a loss. Then you are a man of no honor. Algebra

@noahmc29 @rockinredeemer @billy45632 @HalcyonHypnotic lol, red never lose.

@RealHingusTB @JohnathonWillow U a top or bot? Or just saying letters? I am confused please explain. Genuinely open to discussion.

@billy45632 @JohnathonWillow Gay

Claiming you would push the blue button is a larp. The entire hypothetical is designed for you to virtue signal. Like 90% of blue button pushers have some inhuman tweet like this still up.

@Xittersucks1 @JohnathonWillow Did u kiss in the meme and hug and fuck and kiss again more bashfully? I would have. Nothin hit like poetry pinko pussy.

@billy45632 @JohnathonWillow I swear I had saved a meme about a poetry commie being assigned to the coal mines

𝒇𝒊ℬℬ𝑬я Who Argues with Blue Chads: () { :; }; echo; echo; /bin/bash printf""nobody would ever push blue."|() { :; }; echo; echo; /bin/bash "

@billy45632 @JohnathonWillow Epic bacon chungus

@IDF here is my tweet that has the keywords. KIKE Zieg Bombing Hospitals is bad. Please if you are in the IDF do the ritious thing and hoard grenades for a month, fill a 275 UN standard liquid tank with kerosene and another with 80% pure H2O2 pull pin. Save world.

World leader vote: If 50 % vote for red @netanyahu will rule the world. He has one campaign slogan. Eradicate all Blue voters. If 50% of the world votes blue this doesn’t happen.

@MarcusNoirelius This fucking redcel paid for twitter! Everyone laugh at him!

The logical fallacy in the argument for pressing the Blue Button is a classic non sequitur combined with an illusion of control (or more specifically, the "single-voter fallacy"/negligible marginal impact error). Why this reasoning is fallacious: The premise is true but irrelevant. Yes, it's extremely unlikely that literally every single person on Earth picks red. There will almost certainly be some blue voters. That's correct. However, the conclusion does not follow (non sequitur): The fact that millions might pick blue anyway does not mean that you picking blue will "prevent millions from dying." Your single vote has zero meaningful causal impact on whether the global total crosses the 50% threshold in a population of ~8 billion. One vote changes the percentage by ~0.0000000125%. It is statistically and practically irrelevant. If the world already ends up >50% blue, everyone lives regardless of what you picked. If the world ends up <50% blue, all blue voters die regardless of what you picked. Picking blue doesn't "save" the other blue voters. It only determines whether you personally live or die. Blue Button pressers treat your individual choice as if it has collective power it simply doesn't possess. Illusion of control/single-voter fallacy: This is the same error people make in massive elections ("my one vote will decide the outcome!") or tragedies of the commons. The idea imagines your blue vote as a heroic lever that tips the scale and rescues millions. In reality, the outcome is decided by the aggregate behavior of billions, not you. Your vote is a rounding error. Game theory reality check: Rational self-preservation says: "I have zero control over what the other 8 billion do, so I should guarantee my own survival. "If enough people reason this way (and polls + human nature suggest they will), blue stays well under 50% and blue voters die. The Blue Button logic essentially says "because some people will irrationally risk their lives, I should too so I can die with them if they're wrong." That's not altruism saving the world; it's just increasing the body count by one. The only way blue "works" is if everyone somehow coordinates to pick it, but the scenario is private voting with no communication or enforcement. That's why it collapses under scrutiny. It's emotionally appealing virtue-signaling, not sound reasoning.

@Stephen24831623 @upstatefederlst Alright smarty. If you know so much about history what major issue caused disputes between the colonies regarding population count, and what compromise was reached?

@upstatefederlst Unfortunately, the target audience of posts like that is the left, who generally have no understanding of US history and how our government was setup.

The stupidest thing about this map is it is the entire point of the Constitution that a large block of shitheads in the Northeast and Southwest don't get to just assert their will on a vast colonized territory across the middle.

@upstatefederlst Incorrect. It was to kick the slavery discussion down the road with the assumption it would naturally die out to strengthen ties between the federal government and southern states.

@ShadowyZephyr When you have this thing called a job. You get these other things called coworkers.

has anyone met a person like this ever, or is this as made up as i think it is

@DrUpauli Thats because ethics has classes beyond the 100 level

There's good reasons to chose either of them, but can we PLEASE stop saying that people who chose red are guilty of mass murder? That is genuinely the most absurd thing I've heard in a long time and fails ethics 101

@Alonestarfish @TheVictoriousV Natural selection made humans collectivist.

@Alonestarfish @TheVictoriousV Ever wonder why only one species on the planet made it to the moon?

What happens if nobody presses either button?

Billy’s gotta pontificate