Ben Kuhl

2.3K posts

Ben Kuhl

Ben Kuhl

@bkuhlorelse

Software Engineer

Katılım Mart 2010
115 Takip Edilen206 Takipçiler
Ben Kuhl
Ben Kuhl@bkuhlorelse·
Gave Laravel Cloud Managed Queues a shot. The experience is 10/10, but realized for my app we'd need 75 workers to match "current" capacity (which is just webhooks), and it's not worth $200/mo for that functionality. We're priced out of being able to use it. Back to DB queues
English
0
0
0
4
Ben Kuhl
Ben Kuhl@bkuhlorelse·
@conductor_build Is there a plan to still use Conductor with a Claude subscription?
English
0
0
0
10
Ben Kuhl
Ben Kuhl@bkuhlorelse·
@skcd42 Is there any official place release notes are published?
English
0
2
3
152
skcd
skcd@skcd42·
Bug fixes shipping to Grok Build 0.1.219 (release notes will be available in the TUI) - fixing usage limit bugs with prompt caching - fix layout-shifted chars in kitty terminal - replace Shift+Enter w/ Alt-Enter on VTE-based terminals (GNOME Terminal, Ptyxis, kgx, Tilix, etc.) - default expand (search_replace, write_file, run_terminal_command) calls on scrollback - mixed prose + URL paste no longer silently drops prose - set_images byte: length collision losing chips - make multi-line markdown link URLs clickable across word-wrap - clear selection when expanding truncated group - remove read_file duplicate-read check that breaks after compaction
English
181
81
891
9.8M
Ben Kuhl
Ben Kuhl@bkuhlorelse·
@sivalabs IMO opensource/local models will become the standard for implementation as the workers, only relying on cloud/expensive models for planning.
English
0
0
2
200
Siva
Siva@sivalabs·
Previously I was using AI monthly $20 subscription and the cost is not a problem considering the benefits. But now I am using API Usage Billing and it cost $30 just for 2 hours of usage. I have a gut feeling that sooner or later all providers will go for API Usage based billing. I wonder whether companies can afford this much cost for speed of development?
English
29
6
97
22.5K
Ben Kuhl
Ben Kuhl@bkuhlorelse·
@jasonlbeggs 100%, just requires a few extra steps early on to establish the pattern (e.g. feature flags)
English
1
0
2
194
Jason Beggs
Jason Beggs@jasonlbeggs·
We've been building the spending limits feature for Laravel Cloud, but instead of shipping one giant PR, we've already shipped 10 PRs in the web app, 2 infra PRs, and have 5 more to go. At least 80% of the code is already in production behind a feature flag and has been tested in different slices. AI makes it easier than ever to ship 20,000 line PRs, but we try to avoid this as much as possible. Shipping in small, incremental PRs using feature flags and backwards compatible changes makes PRs easier to review, makes releases less scary, and gives you the ability to test things internally before launching to users. Once the remaining PRs are finished, we'll turn the feature flag on internally so we can test everything end-to-end before launching to everyone. I’m curious if other teams work in similar ways?
English
24
7
154
17K
unusual_whales
unusual_whales@unusual_whales·
Mr. Whale comes with any retail subscription plan to Unusual Whales. It is your must have companion. Come join the waters, here: unusualwhales.com/ai
English
4
1
43
49K
unusual_whales
unusual_whales@unusual_whales·
BREAKING: We did it. We built a trading companion connected to real-time market data, straight from the source. Meet Mr. Whale. He knows what happened to your favorite stock 2 minutes ago. And how to use our tools to find your next favorite stock. Ask him anything today.
English
97
73
1.1K
448.1K
Ben Kuhl
Ben Kuhl@bkuhlorelse·
@joshcirre I hope so, I was just considering moving off of it due to cost because a simple VPS is still so much cheaper. The queues improvements might change that for me though.
English
1
0
1
48
Ben Kuhl
Ben Kuhl@bkuhlorelse·
@taylorotwell So glad to see these autoscaling improvements for consumers!
English
0
0
2
1.7K
Taylor Otwell
Taylor Otwell@taylorotwell·
I've been waiting to share this. Huge updates coming soon to Laravel Cloud over the next few weeks... ☁️ • A new $5/month plan. We want Cloud to be accessible to every Laravel developer. Simple as that. • Spend caps. Set a spend cap on your account and we'll either alert you or shut off compute when you hit it. No surprise bills. • True scale-to-zero compute. Hibernation has been around for a while, but we've made wake-up over 10x faster. App, database, and cache wake-up is now measured in milliseconds. Your users won't even notice. • New bot protection rules keep scale-to-zero apps scaled to zero more of the time, cutting your compute spend even further. • Fully managed, auto-scaling queues with observability. We've rebuilt "queue clusters" into a new product: "managed queues". Set a max worker count and we handle the rest. Scales on queue depth, scales to zero when idle, so you're never over-provisioned. Huge thanks to everyone building on Laravel Cloud. Your feedback shaped most of what's above - keep it coming. ❤️
English
77
75
979
110.7K
Aaron Francis
Aaron Francis@aarondfrancis·
Building a native app is no joke man. I know GitHub has had their issues of late, but thank God for GitHub Actions.
Aaron Francis tweet media
English
15
0
141
14.7K
Ben Kuhl
Ben Kuhl@bkuhlorelse·
@lydiahallie Cost trackers in Claude CLI show $$$ burn so much more quickly than the subscription leads to believe. There's a reason Claude doesn't show that by default :). This is a significant downgrade, that'll burn through very quickly.
English
0
0
2
1.2K
Lydia Hallie ✨
Lydia Hallie ✨@lydiahallie·
To add some clarity: you don't pay extra. It's the same subscription, same price per month. What's new our sub now covers two separate pools: · Interactive → sub limits, unchanged · Programmatic → new $20–$200 included(!!) credit, metered at API rates
Lydia Hallie ✨ tweet media
ClaudeDevs@ClaudeDevs

Starting June 15, paid Claude plans can claim a dedicated monthly credit for programmatic usage. The credit covers usage of: - Claude Agent SDK - claude -p - Claude Code GitHub Actions - Third-party apps built on the Agent SDK

English
343
54
774
548.5K
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Not exactly. SpaceX requires that there be no annoying “portal” to use Starlink. Starlink WiFi must just work effortlessly every time, as though you were at home. Delta wanted to make it painful, difficult and expensive for their customers. Hard to see how that is a winning strategy.
English
1.4K
2.3K
43.6K
2.9M
Sawyer Merritt
Sawyer Merritt@SawyerMerritt·
Delta rejected adopting SpaceX's @Starlink on its fleet because it wanted to provide internet connectivity to passengers via the Delta Sync portal, instead of the Starlink-branded portal. Delta has since chosen to partner with Amazon's LEO. This will result in Delta falling behind many of its competitors in offering high-speed WiFi onboard, as many other carriers are already offering or installing Starlink, whereas Amazon's LEO airplane WiFi for Delta is still a couple year away (or more). Satellites currently in orbit: • SpaceX's Starlink: 10,400 • Amazon's LEO: 300 (Delta rejection info according to Ron Baron)
Sawyer Merritt tweet mediaSawyer Merritt tweet media
English
698
649
10.5K
1.9M
ClaudeDevs
ClaudeDevs@ClaudeDevs·
Claude Code weekly limits are increasing 50%, now through July 13. Live now for all Pro, Max, Team, and seat-based Enterprise users.
ClaudeDevs tweet media
English
1.4K
2.1K
22.4K
2.7M
unusual_whales
unusual_whales@unusual_whales·
BREAKING: Reporter: “To what extent are Americans’ financial situations motivating you to make a deal? [with Iran]” Trump: “Not even a little bit…. I don't think about Americans’ financial situation”
English
755
3.9K
26.7K
1.3M
Ben Kuhl
Ben Kuhl@bkuhlorelse·
@loyalteams @iamAnish @PlanetScale A challenge I run into with these is that I can get a VPS for $12/mo that runs many sites. This is $12/mo for 2+ domains. The pricing doesn't make sense.
English
0
0
0
36
Jams
Jams@loyalteams·
@iamAnish @PlanetScale Use serverme.site and save yourself the headache 🙂‍↕️ of self hosting , it allows you to also plug in your own vps server
English
3
1
2
4.6K
Anish Srinivasan
Anish Srinivasan@iamAnish·
me: $5/db on @PlanetScale that’s nothing also me: has 15 side projects nobody uses the bill: $75 new strategy: one db, schema per app. when something blows up, i’ll migrate that one schema out. problem for future me. am i missing something here?
English
41
2
273
105K
Ben Kuhl
Ben Kuhl@bkuhlorelse·
@joncphillips @ignasxv Agreed, a lot of these systems advertise themselves as good for hobby projects, but pricing wise it doesn't work unless you plan to turn it into a small business.
English
0
0
0
103
Jon C. Phillips
Jon C. Phillips@joncphillips·
@ignasxv "Most SaaS deploys on serverless" is a stretch. Plenty of indie founders are running on a VPS with a deploy script. Serverless is popular but it's very very far from universal, especially for solo founders trying to keep things simple.
English
2
0
2
3.4K
Jon C. Phillips
Jon C. Phillips@joncphillips·
Hot take: SQLite in production is fine for 90% of the SaaS products people are building. Your app doesn’t need Postgres.
English
202
87
2.3K
255.7K
Ben Kuhl
Ben Kuhl@bkuhlorelse·
@ignasxv @joncphillips Serverless forces additional systems depending on needs. VPS is better in a lot of scenarios, because it's flexible and extendable, especially if you're running multiple sites like that.
English
0
0
0
77
ignas Kamugisha 🇹🇿
ignas Kamugisha 🇹🇿@ignasxv·
@joncphillips This is a loose take most SaaS nowadays deploys on serverless (where sqlite don’t work) So you will need either a separate vps or sqlite cloud provider, and that’s is unnecessary hassle for “90% of SaaS products”. So you might as well just use whatever.
English
2
0
0
3.8K
Ben Kuhl
Ben Kuhl@bkuhlorelse·
@joncphillips I've switched a few systems to use sqlite from mysql, it's wonderful.
English
0
0
0
12