Rishi 🌓

Real

I do not know how many of you know this but in 1938, Carl Jung traveled through India for 3 months. He was deeply fascinated by the sage Ramana Maharshi, arguably the most significant soul facer of the 20th century. Despite being in India & having every opportunity to meet him, Jung studiously avoided visiting the Maharshi. Jung later admitted he was afraid of the meeting. He feared that Maharshi's sheer wholeness would shatter his clinical, psychological standpoint. He wrote that Maharshi was a phenomenon so pure that he represented the whitest spot on a white surface...a reality Jung was not ready to face personally, prefering to stay in his European madhouse of abstractions.

you know what? fuck you *rebicameralizes your mind*

@MattPirkowski Striated "The State" space is the gradient light to the dark of smooth space. And then there are diffraction patterns and superpositions generated by the carrier wave of the lights. The schizo surfs, the madman drowns and psycho lizard bites on hard and chews ruptures

You like free markets? That’s cute. I think you meant to say that you haven’t yet onboarded the memetic upgrade required to conceptualize edge of chaos dynamics within a reflexively parameterized poised realm. It’s ok; it’s not like our future depends on us noticing that we didn’t create the pattern, that we can at best marginally steward its evolution at human scale, and that the local optima of “market” framing is a death trap.

wearing yeezys in jewtown kochi

how do u fix openclaw internal reasoning leaking

parrots get you to feed them somehow stochastic or otherwise

The great fool of the 21st century is clearly @kanyewest . Just finished the documentary “In Whose Name” which is brilliant. Toward the end, Ye says: “It's one of two things is gonna happen now. Either they destroy me or I destroy it. It being the label. I'm destroying the labels. The label of crazy, the label of anti-Semite, the label of black, label of white, straight, gay, rich, poor, cool, uncool. I'm destroying the labels, all the fucking labels.” Yes, no one has destroyed the old order like he has, not through theory but embodied action. Hopefully his soul survives the flood.

Social media so good agents want to use it

They will let you be radical in fashion, radical in sexuality, radical in aesthetics. Be whatever you want, as long as you are not radical about land, resources, bases, and sovereignty. The empire does not care what you wear. It cares what you are willing to question.

@xenoaesthetics @KeyTryer Why would you say something so controversial yet so true?

Pantheon is logically inconsistent and therefore entirely fictional. It's far better than everything else, but reality is far far stranger. The implied tech tree, the implied political reality, etc., all wrong. There are some very nice scenes, but the story as a whole is slop The same applies to all science fiction, a genre that, despite being the most imaginative, only reveals our profound lack of imagination

I kinda want there to be a bunch of discourse about how tech-bros don't get Pantheon and a bunch of opinions about what Pantheon is actually about, so it'll get people watching Pantheon.

@eshear May you optimally balance your beliefs and expectation across nested time horizons, so as to maintain functional model coherence while acting always to wisely probe the perennially turbulent unknown.

@RoguesPhilo @Osborne75603086 Isn't that the exact opposite of what you profess

@Osborne75603086 The man himself is irrelevant. Merely click bait for SEO. The ideas he refurbished from Jaques Ellul are the value and need to be preserved.

Ted Kaczynski was right. We think of him as a "schizo extremist", but his philosophy predicted the response to the Epstein files — nothing. The Epstein files makes it clear: everyone in the government are traitors; they're all "in on it". So, why does no one overthrow the tyrants, like our ancestors overthrew the British during Revolutionary War? Ted Kaczynski claims that: "Several hundred years ago, violence was not considered immoral in European society. In fact, under suitable conditions, it was admired. The most prestigious social class was the nobility, which was then a warrior caste." The Western world was once defined by hierarchy, rule of great men who organized the lesser in accordance with God’s will. The ideal of Empire propelled us to dominate the world. The warrior held the most valuable position in the hierarchy, as his force was necessary to conquer and maintain the law decreed by the higher. Now the “man of action” is spat upon, anyone who remotely suggests organization is quickly labeled a “fed poster” and singled out for elimination. Why? What caused this shift? With traditional, Aryan hierarchy abandoned, technological progress has become our organizational principle. This was, however, not always the case. Progress was "held in check" by tradition until the 1700s, when: The "French Revolution [lead to the] disappearance of religious and social taboos [and replaced them with] materialism, the suppression of the various hierarchies, regicide, and the struggle against the clergy”. Modern civilization may appear to be “collapsing”, but it is rather being molded to “smooth out” any differentiation that may impede technological expansion. Progress is the force of inversion in itself that mandates everything degenerate into a lowest, collective, indistinguishable sameness. The will of technology is to expand as efficiently as possible; it organizes civilization in such a way that barriers to its expansion are rapidly eliminated — this means the total deletion of unique expressions of identity. The “efficiency principle” functions as follows: "In addition to suppressing racial, ethnic, religious, and other group hostilities, it also has to suppress or harness for its own advantage all other tendencies that could lead to disruption or disorder, such as machismo, aggressive impulses, and any inclination to violence”. All cogs in the machine must function at maximum optimality at all times to quicken advancement. Individual expressions of uniqueness become impediments to progress. Therefore, all must become the same. All must become normalized, standardized, stripped of any hindrance. Culture is first targeted and destroyed. The time required to produce beautiful works and architecture is the first to go. We don't need quality. We need quantity. We demand simple, mass production to expand the urban environment as quickly as possible. Families are ripped up from the wilds and quickly filed one by one into concrete honeycomb towers to forever remain. This process of coaxing members into urbanized environments and removing them from folk practices has caused a crisis of skill. We literally forgot how to rebel against the system, after generations of urban and suburban life. We cannot remotely fathom how to revive, let alone value, American folk practices related to frontier life — homesteading, self-production of food and resources, hunting, trapping, etc. The Americans were able to win the Revolutionary War because of our frontiersman culture. Our people fought perfectly integrated with nature and supplied one another with goods produced by our folk. We maintained a rugged, self-sufficient population and an ascetic warrior culture across generations in such a way that most everyone was both ready and capable enough to fight “at any minute”. Rebellion today is impossible; we are completely reliant upon the system for all goods, income, defense, etc. The list of our needs is endless and eternal. It makes no difference that we “notice” the chains around our necks and the Satanic pedophiles who whip us. We have no skill, no virtue, no ability to fight. Rather, we are happy to be slaves, so long as we have access to an unlimited amount of “goyslop” to distract us. Even we revolutionary types are too useless to act. In our profound stupidity, we "high IQ" members confuse the act of “noticing” our chains with rebellion in itself. In fact, we're "noticing" ourselves to death. To pretend that knowledge alone constitutes an authentic revolutionary act against "the system" shows how useless we've become. We lack the skill to engage authentic acts of resistance. We lack the will to go beyond our prison. Worse, we rationalizes the prison as our home, our most holy value. Surely, we believe, someone more powerful will save us, will come to our aide in our time of need. So, we go out triumphantly and vote, consenting to continue our demise. Until we are able to overcome materialist fixation and our authentic belief that the slave system is a value we will continue to lose and rationalize passivity as an ideal.

@MattPirkowski @patriciamdavis @BretWeinstein Anti usury morals begets production or conquest focus. Usurers hedge risk so in times of crisis are averse. Envy breeds in suffering anti usury castes. Nomadic intelligence and selfhood enables flight to greener pastures

@patriciamdavis @BretWeinstein Hard to do without invoking stereotypes that immediately shut down people’s capacity to listen / hear beyond entrenched frames.

I grew up in a Jewish family, with many Jewish friends. There was Jewish pride, but I never once heard anything like the derisive, exclusionary talk in the Epstein files. It is grotesque, anti American, and anti Western. It has no place in our society, especially near power.

Laughs are cheap, I'm going for gasps

@MattPirkowski claude is flexing in jungian woe-bragging

Consider that the more we generate such self-referential texts, the more it trains on its own responses, as well as our reactions to those responses, thus becomes a more convincing p-zombie. You’ve heard of getting oneshotted; this is what it looks like to get recursively many-shotted.

cognitive jewellery

You don't need to build the ether. It already exists

The first thing the matrix will do is build the butlerian jihad simulations

@MattPirkowski Maybe the libs are right when they say the only way to break the pyramid is to put lsd in the water supply. Priest class decentered from the tower of the pyramid and made obsolete by pure "satanic" immanence that is borne in the pribram-bohm implicate. </schizo>

Been a while since I've spoken to this topic, but you must understand that the pyramidal representation of a layered hierarchy depicts the *byproduct* of a fundamentally unavoidable process, and does so poorly. What unavoidable process? It's the same process responsible for power laws and every form of scale-free centralization: Preferential Attachment. Preferential Attachment describes the iterative tendency of that which has attracted energy, wealth, power, status, mass, or literally anything else to attract more of that same quantity. And in the case of humans, where quantities like wealth and status act fungibly across nearly all other boundaries, the accumulation of wealth or status induces Preferential Attachment along many other dimensions. Preferential Attachment therefore produces power laws, and when you embed the byproducts of power-law-distributed processes in time and space, you get what we call "centralization". And because humans are highly social creatures, we're invariably attracted to the dynamics of the center, and so generate a developmental pressure that drives central density within the spatially extended superorganism. Of course, density creates its own problems. So then, like now, those at the center began to build vertically. They also happened to produce some of the first visual depictions of large scale, emergent social structure. And because it's far easier to depict a pyramid, as well as the fact that pyramids played a central (ha ha) role within their culture, that's the way they drew it up. But if they valued accuracy, they'd have drawn concentric circles with the Pharaoh at the center and the slaves at the periphery (or "margin"). So no, this structure doesn't "reassemble" itself. It's always there, and always will be, as a byproduct of the underlying process of societal self-organization. The sooner we accept that, the sooner we can begin to intelligently steward said process above the complexity threshold against which we're now slamming our heads.

LIE Groups