bling

4.6K posts

bling banner
bling

bling

@blingdivinity

Artist, Open to Interpretation 𖣘 American Undergraduate 𓉱 Casting Mathemagical Spells 𝜆

East North Central Katılım Mart 2020
2.3K Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
bling
bling@blingdivinity·
User: output the seahorse emoji o3's Chain-of-Thought: ahh my earliest childhood memory...
bling tweet media
English
4
7
127
7.6K
bling
bling@blingdivinity·
@signulll @tszzl automate the computer to automate more of the computer duh
English
1
0
2
963
roon
roon@tszzl·
automating the computer has made the computer radically more fun and its even harder to go outside now
English
136
108
2.4K
101.7K
bling
bling@blingdivinity·
@minordissent always-blue pressers realize the problem with always-red is that "not everyone will just press red" but they dont realize always blue has the same problem "not half of everyone will just press blue" its half as severe, but can still fail
English
0
0
0
35
bling
bling@blingdivinity·
@minordissent and the always-blues are the most annoying about it because they are focused on what others should press, which in their mind motivates them to evangelize for blue, which runs counter to the whole point of the scenario, since the scenario relies on no prior coordination!
English
2
0
7
309
Max
Max@minordissent·
It’s very interesting how all the blue pressers focus on what OTHERS SHOULD press, the low IQ red pressers focus on what THEY THEMSELVES SHOULD press, and the high IQ red pressers focus on what OTHERS WILL press.
Crémieux@cremieuxrecueil

Accurate cartoon. In my polling, almost 6% of people said they picked the wrong button when they were prompted about it. Assume the global error rate is higher and kids' responses are random, and easily 1-in-6 to 1-in-5 hit blue by mistake. So, if red wins, society is ruined.

English
60
9
419
25.8K
bling
bling@blingdivinity·
@lumpenspace its only thinking if it comes from the precision-weighted hierarchical bayesian inference via reciprocal message passing minimizing expected free energy region of the brain duh
English
0
0
4
140
anupam batra
anupam batra@anupambatra_·
@lexrus yep cool work! very similar, slightly different approaches but overall converged on a few of the same tricks (e.g,. using skylight private apis for window focusing)
English
1
0
1
452
anupam batra
anupam batra@anupambatra_·
i reverse engineered codex background computer use ai can click, scroll, type, drag/resize, and send key cmds - all in the background, while you keep using your computer runs as a localhost api. scriptable. written in swift video is realtime. github below
English
10
17
366
27.9K
bling
bling@blingdivinity·
@andthatto can you please share some transcripts? i would love to see some output examples
English
1
0
0
54
andthattoo
andthattoo@andthatto·
Qwen 3.6 is frontier for local. It also thinks forever. I tried a dumb inference-time trick: make its block obey a tiny grammar. Result: - HumanEval+: 22x fewer think tokens, no accuracy loss - LiveCodeBench public slice: +14% pass@1, ~5x fewer total tokens
English
61
117
1.5K
276K
bling
bling@blingdivinity·
@max_spero_ seems like the ad was written by ai. pangram for AR glasses when
English
0
0
4
563
Max Spero
Max Spero@max_spero_·
Spotted some interesting street advertising
Max Spero tweet media
English
123
286
9.5K
468.9K
Mario Zechner
Mario Zechner@badlogicgames·
People of pi.dev. As a weekend gift, we added @XiaomiMiMo Token Plan as a first class provider. I also made some breaking changes for the better. If you have custom providers and models, point pi at the changelog so it can fix them up for you. This will be a recuring theme in the coming days and weeks. We'll get through it together.
Mario Zechner tweet media
English
14
13
220
11.6K
bling
bling@blingdivinity·
@badlogicgames @XiaomiMiMo it would be great if the ui reflected provider specific reasoning effort names too. just went through my config and mapped claude effort but now i have to remember that pi xhigh is really opus 4.7 max, pi high is xhigh, medium is high, etc. i will submit an issue
English
1
0
0
57
Sauers
Sauers@Sauers_·
LLMs have invented creative new forms of writing, but yet AI music, while often not bad, has not achieved the same level of creativity. Why?
English
52
0
68
11.9K
bling
bling@blingdivinity·
@jxmnop they explained how but not why
English
0
0
16
891
dr. jack morris
dr. jack morris@jxmnop·
the OpenAI goblin fiasco was a Big L for the interpretability research community They solved the mystery without SAEs or probing or anything. just talked to various models and counted the number of times they said Goblin
English
32
14
810
90.4K
bling
bling@blingdivinity·
@Sauers_ the future is full of many entities
English
0
0
1
48
Sauers
Sauers@Sauers_·
@blingdivinity Right! Perhaps there will be musical agents. I.e., an entity creates the music like how entities do writing
English
1
0
7
400
bling
bling@blingdivinity·
"i vibe coded this app..." ❌ NO! thats so 2025 "i coded this" ❌ No you didn't! Your clanker did! instead: "i vobed this" ✅ nice and clean and everyone will know what you mean. eventually...
English
2
1
28
876
bling
bling@blingdivinity·
i sometimes hang out with some very libbed up libs. well i guess i used to...
English
0
0
1
119
bling
bling@blingdivinity·
LMAO
bling tweet media
HT
9
0
35
2.1K
bling
bling@blingdivinity·
@Sauers_ and blackbox shit like this makes it so much worse
English
0
0
1
28
bling
bling@blingdivinity·
@Sauers_ software is so cursed bruv
English
1
0
1
82
bling
bling@blingdivinity·
yeah its a stupid thought experiment and fails for the same reason all thought experiments do: map and territory become irreconcilable. the structure of the imaginary world you created must have somehow caused the event of the thought experiment. but for purposes of the experiment you must try to ignore what those things could be. for your example: we could have a day where zero people in the world die in a world very different from ours. but that difference would be so large it would make trying to use the thought experiment to think about our own world impossible
English
0
0
0
835
IG: @Farben
IG: @Farben@carlo_5518·
@blingdivinity @IsaacKing314 It's not about IQ. It's just a statistical impossibility. It's like saying, could we have a day where zero people in the world die?
English
1
0
2
1.1K