Fumo

Trees. Trees. Trees. They matter. Plant them. Protect them.

starting a new life July 1, bye.

the dead horse is beating me

Law Reporting channels who upload photos of counsels getting grilled to make the public think that something so unique or disastrous has happened, need to be shunned by the entire legal fraternity. There is nothing in this interaction that's worth being posted.

@LawBeatInd law beat i say this sincerely that your brand should be shut down. wassup with yall posting the names of the counsels and plastering their face on twitter? have yall lost your rabid ass mind?

Really fail to understand this new trend of uploading screenshots from proceedings without blurring names of counsels. So unnecessary.

@LawBeatInd What’s the need of uploading screenshots without even blurring the names of counsels?

Adv Iru Srivastava: Kindly adjourn this matter for the next week. Justice Sandeep Mehta: Tell us, why? We have read the file. You did not have the courtesy to circulate an adjournment letter. Court: Alright, counsel for petitioner pays for time, list after six weeks.

look at the economy this is not the time for romance

you really do just have to move on

@KartiPC @NTA_Exams You should also shut down all the shopping malls since there might be a theft in one of them. And close the roads because I heard someone was speeding.

Very unfortunate observation from the apex court!!

'Tired of fighting alone’: Paediatrician who fought fake ORS, resigns from Indian Academy of Paediatrics.

I am horrified that not ONE minister or Politician is doing a thing to change what's happening to Vinesh Phogat. Blood will boil boil boil and boil and eventually dry up. What a shit country of rapists and rapist protectors.

There should be a limit to foolishness.

*STATEMENT* As per reports, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court today has issued notice to me in a plea seeking initiation of criminal contempt proceedings over one of my reports concerning the appearance of conflict of interest and reasonable apprehension of bias in Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma hearing the CBI appeal in the Delhi Excise Policy case. The petitioner alleges that my report contains “serious, unfounded and scandalous allegations” against Justice Sharma. I stand firmly by my reporting. The report was based entirely on documentary material: RTI data furnished by the Ministry of Law & Justice, the judge’s own judicial orders in Criminal Revision Petitions, publicly available records, and statements made by a sitting Hon’ble Judge of the Supreme Court himself. Not a single fact reported by me has been rebutted either by the judge concerned or by the CBI in any of the proceedings, including the suo-motu contempt proceedings. In that backdrop, an unattached third party has now come into the picture. That said, since the matter now directly concerns me and is sub-judice, it will not be appropriate to comment further on the merits at this stage. I shall place my response before the Court after consulting distinguished members of the Bar, eminent legal luminaries, and respected members of the fraternity. The constitutional guarantee of free speech includes the right, not just of journalists, but of every citizen, to fairly scrutinise and critique judicial functioning and administrative decisions that have a bearing on public confidence in the institution. The faith in the institution can never be strengthened through opacity or the chilling of public scrutiny. Journalism that seeks to uncover these uncomfortable facts in the largest of public interests is part of the constitutional duty of the fourth pillar. Questions cannot be contempt.✊🏻 #JournalismIsNotACrime

SHAME ON US, SHAME ON US

Another problem of being a cockroach is being made to go to SC in this heat to seek an adjournment :)

Journalist of the country is busy in romanticizing two leaders that's why other country journalist need to ask questions.

Delhi is becoming unliveable day by day.