
Sam Weiss
58 posts





If you watch the full Trump-Zelensky press conference, it is very clear that Zelensky, not Trump or Vance, became the antagonist. Both POTUS and VP were very respectful and cordial until Zelensky very publicly ignited a firestorm. It all starts at 40:30 1) Zelensky essentially rejects how VP described the mandate of POTUS to conduct foreign affairs, and he insinuates that Trump term one did nothing to stop Putin. 2) He then basically tells Vance that his ideas are faulty and that the administration's diplomacy won't work. These two comments are *deliberately antagonistic.* Everything was all well and good, but Zelensky took two major shots in a public forum, and they had to respond. And respond they did. Recall, this is the guy who interfered in our electoral politics and called VP "too radical," and bashed Trump in an interview with New York Mag weeks before the election. Zelensky is ENTIRELY at fault here. 100%.






@hannahdreier @nytimes @stillsarita @NewYorker @sarahanneconway @city_bureau @invinst @Reuters @washingtonpost Congratulations to @nytimes. #Pulitzer














@CalumDouglas1 While it was a fine aircraft in many roles, given the need to crush 🇩🇪industry, could it really have been more than a tactical bomber in this context. Forgetting the morality of firebombing/area bombing etc. just my tuppence worth Calum.




Here’s a video going around that moved me to tears: A bunch of kids gathered yesterday to sing in Hebrew around some arch. “Who cares?”, you might ask. Well, that’s the Arch of Titus in Rome And yesterday was the anniversary of the events it was constructed to commemorate. 🧵


















