bpitas

2.7K posts

bpitas

bpitas

@bpitas

Amherst, NH Katılım Aralık 2008
620 Takip Edilen291 Takipçiler
bpitas
bpitas@bpitas·
@Reuters @MissJilianne The real question that regulators should ask is not whether FSD is perfect - the question is whether it’s safer than a human. If they delay it even if it’s saver than a human, then they will have blood on their hands.
English
0
0
0
30
bpitas
bpitas@bpitas·
@P365_9 @EricLDaugh @dbongino @grok I think part of the problem is that you think that signing bad legislation into law is more of an accomplishment than proposing good legislation that doesn’t get signed. It’s clearly not.
English
1
0
0
12
Green Dragon Tavern 1776
Only one is law, as you know. My point is, he doesn't know how to get his bills passed. Strong bills do NOTHING if they do not become law. There is a way to move in the right direction, and there is a way to die on your self-righteous hill while grandstanding at the top. He thinks like an engineer, not a policy maker or even a politician.
English
1
0
0
21
Eric Daugherty
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh·
🚨 WOW. President Trump goes NUCLEAR on Rep. Thomas Massie "We gotta get rid of this loser! This guy is bad! He's disloyal to the Republican Party, he's disloyal to the people of Kentucky, and disloyal to the United States of America!"
English
507
1.7K
7.8K
175.7K
bpitas
bpitas@bpitas·
@grok please list some of the best legislation that Rep Thomas Massie has introduced along with a one sentence synopsis of why anyone who loves freedom and America should support that legislation. Use Massie’s own explanation if available. If the legislation didn’t pass, take a guess as to why it didn’t pass and who stopped it.
English
2
0
0
29
Green Dragon Tavern 1776
@bpitas @EricLDaugh @dbongino BTW, the ONLY law he ever got passed in 15 years was the Epstein Act, which would have passed regardless of who introduced it. And TWO amendments. He has changed some rules of debate and that is it. 15 years of whining and grandstanding. Loser.
English
1
0
0
14
bpitas
bpitas@bpitas·
So the best thing about Massie is that he goes out of his way to explain his reasoning on votes. So when bots list out how he voted on something, I can hear from the horse’s mouth why he voted the way he did. And once I know why he voted that way, I find I always agree with his reasoning. So you cherry picking some misleading examples changes nothing. If Massie voted a certain way, then it was the right vote when you get into the details. Voting based on Party versus what’s best for the country is exactly what’s wrong with Congress - I trust Massie and Rand to do the right thing regardless of the politics of it.
English
2
0
1
14
Green Dragon Tavern 1776
For the Record! Massie has stalled border enforcement and has often voted against Republicans on key votes that propelled democrats to victory. Here’s just a small portion of Massie's voting record: 🔷Voted yes to terminate President Trump's tariffs on Canada, The House passed it 219-211 with his support. 🔷He also backed a procedural vote (217-214) that blocked Republicans from postponing challenges to a later date, that defeated GOP leadership's rule to block such challenges until later. 🔷Voted against bringing the Save America Act to the House floor. 🔷Massie voted nay on a rule allowing fast-track consideration. 🔷Voted against a law to take down revenge porn. 🔷 Massie was one of two Republicans to vote no on the TAKE IT DOWN Act, which criminalized non consensual intimate images/deepfakes and required platform removal. 🔷Voted against border security funding in multiple instances. 🔷He voted no on the Secure the Border Act and the 2019 emergency border wall funding. 🔷Voted against ICE funding. 🔷Massie was the only Republican to vote no on the DHS appropriations bill which included $10B for ICE deportations. 🔷Voted to protect Adam Schiff from real consequences for lying. 🔷Voted no on censuring Schiff (2023) over Russia collusion claims. 🔷Voted against censuring Ilhan Omar. Voted no on removing Omar from Foreign Affairs Committee (2023). 🔷Voted with democrats to try to eliminate Trump’s tariffs, part of a pattern of challenging executive tariff authority. 🔷Voted against making Trump tax cuts permanent. 🔷Voted no on the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA, 2025), Trump's reconciliation package including no tax on tips and no tax on overtime. 🔷Opposed taking out drug cartel boats. 🔷Supported war powers resolutions (2025-2026) limiting unauthorized strikes, including in Venezuela (cartel linked). 🔷 Co-sponsored war powers resolutions with "Squad" members like Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and others.
English
1
0
0
42
bpitas
bpitas@bpitas·
@objaunkenobe @EricLDaugh @dbongino If the republican budgets include any kind of deficit spending whatsoever, then voting against them is 100% America First! You’d have to be pretty dense to think otherwise….
English
1
0
1
22
Numero uno
Numero uno@objaunkenobe·
@bpitas @EricLDaugh @dbongino Voting with Democrats against Republican budgets causing government shutdowns and wins for Democrats expose Rand and Massie for what they truly are- frauds. Unless you think Democrats running the country is America first.
English
2
0
0
50
bpitas
bpitas@bpitas·
@EricRWeinstein That sounds like a sub plot from the Three Body Problem.
English
1
0
1
519
Eric Weinstein
Eric Weinstein@EricRWeinstein·
Recently I was asked about why I talk about Quantum Gravity in negative terms. Why have I called Quantum Gravity a science arresting mental illness? It is 100% about coercision through poisonous sociology. I am not initiating this behavior; I am returning costs to those who come after me. I have just had it up to hear with QG killing frontier physics through naked anti-scientific agression and madness. Let me give stylized interactions from 40+ years. ME: "I think Witten's wrong about X." QG Theorist: "Wait...YOU think WITTEN is wrong?" ME: "Yes." QGT: "HA HA HA." ME: [30+ Years Later] "...Hey good to see you! Long time. Do you remember when you said Witten was right about X?" QGT: "Yeah...but Witten changed his mind about that a few years after we talked. And I still trust Witten, not you." ME: "Okay...but I was correct and Witten was wrong at that time." QGT: "I still think he was right then." ME: "But you said he reversed himself." QGT: "I just think he's always right. He evolved." That is not a normal scientific interaction. QGT: "Well you don't have a Lagrangian." ME: "Why do you say that?" QGT: "It is well known that you don't have a Lagrangian." ME: "Let me write it down for you." QGT: "Uh...I'm extremely busy." ME: "Here is a picture of a Lagrangian on my phone." QGT: [Literally looks away.] "Sorry: Don't have time!" ME: "Well, you post a lot of unrelated stuff on Twitter. There is a Langrangian at the top of my Twitter profile." QGT: [Trying to avoid confirming a Lagrangian at all costs.] "I have been thinking of moving to BlueSky anyway." ME: "I can put one there too." That is not a normal scientific interaction. ME: "I have my slidedeck, but I didn't see my talk listed." QGT: "We have sent around an email that you will be answering questions in the seminar room on the 4th floor at 3pm" ME: "I am giving a presentation." QGT: "Yes. But, we wanted to make it more informal." ME: "Huh?" QGT: "Well, we all know it is a talk, but we don't want you giving a talk." ME: "I don't get it. I'm a visitor here giving a talk." QGT: "Right. And we all are dying to hear it. Truly. We just don't want you saying you gave a talk." ME: "Uh...did you actually hear the words you just said?" QGT: "We don't want you saying that you gave a talk." ME: "When I gave a talk? Again: do you hear yourself?" QGT: "We want to hear the constructions and ideas...that's why you are invited as a visitor. But we don't want you using the fact that you gave a talk to give you legitimacy." ME: "Which is....uh...my absolute right and totally normal behavior on my part." QGT: "Sure sure. But we would appreciate it if you didn't mention that you gave a talk and that we invited you." That is not a normal Scientific Interaction. ME: [In the middle of a seminar.] "...Which is why the Pati-Salam Grand Unification Group is actually the Maximal Compact Subgroup of the Induced Symmetry Group of Einstein's Symmetric 2-tensors." QGT: "Don't say that." ME: "Uh...why?" QGT: "It sounds funny." ME: "Uh...in what way?" QGT: "It sounds like you are saying that the mysterious Standard Model Group is hidden within General Relativity." ME: "That's the assertion. Yes." QGT: "Well that sounds Grandiose. Like you are saying you found the Standard Model in Relativity." ME: "It's literally called GRAND unified theory. Not Grandiose Unified Theory." QGT: "Well, even if it is true, you shouldn't say it. It makes you sound crazy." ME: "We are in a famous theoretical physics department. You are telling me I am not supposed to do Particle Theory in a Theoretical Physics talk in a Theoretical Physics group in a Theoretical Physics Department. If we can't do that here, where can we do that." QGT: "Well we don't do that kind of stuff anymore." ME: "Uh...then maybe you should??" QGT: "That's your opinion. Just don't do that." That is not a scientific interaction. Etc.... It's a cult. Physics isn't failing. It's just the cult and its leaders which are giving the illusion of universal failure.
English
157
100
999
71K
bpitas
bpitas@bpitas·
@MissJilianne This post a was written 100% while on FSD. You can continue to argue if you want, but I’m not wasting more time on trying to teach you basic stuff. I recommend you look up how eye tracking works though.
bpitas tweet media
English
0
0
0
10
bpitas
bpitas@bpitas·
@MissJilianne Haha that’s so funny-your video proves my point! Look at what your camera shows behind where your phone would mount. The road! That’s why attention monitoring doesn’t trigger when you have your phone mounted there! Do you seriously still not understand how it works?
English
1
0
0
23
@·
This is your friendly reminder, Tesla has yet to get approval for Unsupervised Full Self-Driving vehicles owned by private individuals anywhere in the United States.
English
7
2
27
1.4K
bpitas
bpitas@bpitas·
What are you talking about? The cabin camera is in the rear view mirror, not the touch screen. It determines if you are looking forward out the windshield. And if you are looking above the top left corner of the touchscreen, that’s close enough. Go try it. And also, read the manual so you know what you are talking about. You thinking the cabin camera is in the touchscreen is pretty bad.
English
1
0
0
38
Miss Jilianne
Miss Jilianne@MissJilianne·
@bpitas The upper corner of the cabin camera is NOT on the left side of the screen. You don’t know what you’re talking about, just stop. It’s people like you trying to mislead others who make Tesla look bad.
English
1
0
0
46
bpitas
bpitas@bpitas·
LOL the interior monitoring camera is using a combination of your eyes and the angle of your head to determine where you are looking. If your phone is mounted in the upper left hand corner, then your head is pointed forward enough to appear that you’re looking out the windshield. That’s pretty basic stuff.
English
1
0
0
48
Miss Jilianne
Miss Jilianne@MissJilianne·
@bpitas Putting your phone on the screen does absolutely nothing, it’s clear you have no clue what you’re talking about.
English
1
0
0
35
bpitas
bpitas@bpitas·
@MissJilianne No, sunglasses and mounting your phone on the left of the main screen is enough to keep it from nagging you. I haven’t had a strike in months, and even if you get a strike you just pull over, put it in Park, and then start driving again
English
1
0
0
31
Miss Jilianne
Miss Jilianne@MissJilianne·
@bpitas You still have to supervise it or FSD will start yelling at you and then give you the red hands of death. That’s not what we paid for.
Miss Jilianne tweet media
English
1
0
2
92
bpitas retweetledi
Meidas_Charise Lee
Meidas_Charise Lee@charise_lee·
The US and Israel don’t fight wars to benefit anyone but themselves‼️
English
132
736
2.9K
18.9K
bpitas
bpitas@bpitas·
@busyhandsatwork @FmrRepMTG Yup, definitely interested in what she has to say given that people like her were doing more to deliver Trump’s campaign promises than Trump has been doing.
English
0
0
0
40
DebraC
DebraC@busyhandsatwork·
@FmrRepMTG go away. just go away. No One is interested in your thoughts. You left. You couldn't take it. You quit. "Former" says it all. You are no longer relevant.
English
4
3
30
1K
Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸
Just so you know, while the admin is waging war on Iran for Israel, they also want a full clean authorization on FISA, which has been used as warrantless spying on Americans. And Democrats did the same thing when they were in power. Ok back to AMERICA F YEAH.
English
1.1K
2.1K
12.6K
363.3K
bpitas
bpitas@bpitas·
Literally every country that gave up their nuclear capability got betrayed by the US, so they would be crazy not to try and get nuclear weapons. You should look up “Operation Ajax” to learn why Iran is the way it is today. 100% the fault of the US and especially the UK - we are the bad guys here.
English
0
0
2
59
Kim "Katie" USA
Kim "Katie" USA@KimKatieUSA·
@RonPaul It’s not a war and it sounds like you support a nuclear capable Iran.
English
9
0
18
634
bpitas
bpitas@bpitas·
@MichaelBlack_78 @hodgetwins We installed current leadership of Iran. Look up Operation Ajax - they were just about a democracy before we interfered
English
0
0
2
144
Michael Black
Michael Black@MichaelBlack_78·
@hodgetwins Honestly, this is one of the reasons I voted for Trump. Iran's leadership is evil. The world will be better off without them.
English
31
18
1.3K
28.6K
Hodgetwins
Hodgetwins@hodgetwins·
Freeing the people of Iran is not why I voted for Trump
English
4.9K
565
9.5K
755.3K