The Accountant

Questioner: How do you recognize the truth when it is upon us? Carl Sagan: “A simple question: How can we recognize the truth? It is, of course, difficult. But there are a few simple rules. The truth ought to be logically consistent… It ought to be consistent with what else we know… We should also pay attention to how badly we want to believe…” …“Nobody says it’s easy. I think those three principles at least will winnow out a fair amount of chaff… It doesn’t guarantee that what remains will be true, but at least it will significantly diminish the field of discourse.” Carl was wise, as I've stated, perhaps even the wiest of us all. However, perhaps, he was constrained by the "order of 3," as that's natural to us. The number "3" appears across cultures and spiritual traditions to represent harmony (mind, body, spirit), luck ("third time's the charm"), and divine concepts such as the Holy Trinity (Father, Son, Holy Spirit) in Christianity, signifying perfection and wholeness. In numerology, it's linked to self-expression, optimism, and sociability, while in folklore, it's common in tales like "three wishes" or "three little pigs." But what if we needed a 4th principal (or rule), a variable (placeholder), or a dimension (or category)? Like Perspective, to fully understand (comprehend) the truth of a message? As a perspective on the sender of a message, surely it must play into its validity, and how it should (reasonably) resonate with the intended recipient(s)? Once again, let's ask Carl about "Perspectives."

This is a hard article to read, but I hope you'll do so. I've spent some time reporting on widespread rape of dogs by opinion columnists, and the article is now published. The assault victims were warned not to give speak of what they endured -- because they’re household pets -- but they found the courage to do so. Here's a gift link to the article:

If your source for a story is a man who left his post after sexually harassing minors and an organisation linked to Hamas, then your story is nonsense. Also you’re a terrible journalist.

The point of the NYT piece was to distract from Hamas's rape of Gazan women.

“won in a landslide…” Like Carney, Starmer, Trump….. it’s almost as if elections don’t fucking matter, at all, regardless of ideology/party/votes cast, innit

IT’S AS IF HE HAS A MODEL, TESTED AND IMPLEMENTED AROUND THE FUCKING WORLD!!! The fake “JEWS WILL NOT REPLACE US!!!” false flag bullshit in PA was the blueprint for how to take over a government from within from the start. America, UK, Japan, Australia, Singapore…now South America… What’s the strength of “The Right,” giving people hope (however stupid and false), AS LONG AS IT MAKES THEM FEEL GOOD. Any answer they can understand!!! Robert Mercer and RenTech now just test different shit in various nations, before getting a working model and injecting it into the world. wake the fuck up, jesus, they couldn’t be more blatant about it ffs none of their bullshit is real, and when reality does it, it’s called “price discovery” - you really don’t wanna know how bad shit TRULY IS!!! I wish people would either wake the fuck up, or Robert sends a fucking assassin to put me out of my god damn mystery, because watching this county die a slow death because people are consumed with lies, immobilized by fear, and incapable of critical thought is a punishment far worse than god damn death. fuck you god damn needle dick child rapers!!!! I’ll sing that fuckin’ song to the grave. x.com/brandonmoretz/…

Gee, I wonder if he's jewish..

Netanyahu Insists Iran War To Continue Until Uranium Is 'Physically' Removed zerohedge.com/markets/netany…

“Some men had to have their testicles amputated by doctors after beatings…” Thread with some of the unspeakably depraved acts of rape and sexual assault by Israelis against Palestinians detailed in this piece:

Fuck Cory Booker. Go serve in Israel then, you fucking loser.

How low can the New York Times go? “Jews teach dogs to rape Palestinians” low. Is it any wonder the general public doesn’t trust the MSM?

@Eve_Barlow it’s only gonna get louder from here, jew

The level of Jew hatred at the moment is absolutely deafening

I cannot believe we have to do this. The New York Times, the paper of record, just published an op-ed accusing the State of Israel of systematic sexual violence against Palestinian detainees, including the claim that Israel is training dogs to rape prisoners. One of their sources is a man who left his job after multiple people, including minors, accused him of sending them threatening and sexual messages. The other is Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor, a group whose chairman was sanctioned by Israel as a Hamas operative and who publicly called the testimonies of Israeli women raped on October 7th “fabricated lies.” The Times is using the words of a man credibly accused of sexually harassing children, and an organization led by a man who denies the rape of Jewish women, to build a case that Israelis are sexual predators. This is the most serious accusation you can level at a country. It demands the most serious sourcing. The Times decided the opinion section was good enough. It is not good enough. And spare me the crocodile tears. The same people who spent two years calling the rape victims of October 7th liars, who told us “believe women” had an asterisk when the women were Jewish, are about to share this op-ed with tears in their eyes. They never cared about sexual violence. They cared about who they could pin it on. I do not want to spend my day writing about this. But when the largest newspaper in the world launders this against my people, silence is complicity. @nytimes owes our community, and its readers, an apology.

As a New York Times subscriber, I find it insane that one of its opinion writers, with a known hatred for Israel, literally used Hamas’s salacious propaganda to make an absurd claim about Israel. Didn’t verify any of it. It places into question everything that the NYT publishes.

@HonestReporting @nytimes

1/ The @nytimes just published one of the most serious sets of allegations imaginable against Israel – claims of systematic sexual violence, including a bizarre story about carrots and trained rape dogs. We checked the sources. What we found is journalistic malpractice. 🧵

Front page of the NYTimes - accusing IDF & Israelis of "mass rape". Not a single shred of evidence was listed in the piece, other than the testimonies of 14 people, most of whom are connected to Hamas. I'm at a loss for words.

If you believe that Jews abuse dogs to rape other people, you might just be an antisemite.

The NY Times just published a piece claiming that Israeli soldiers used dogs to rape Palestinians. This is not a joke. I repeat. This is not a joke. I wouldn’t use this trash as toilet paper. The NYT has zero credibility left. Zero!

@IsraelMFA @nytimes

Today, the @nytimes chose to publish one of the worst blood libels ever to appear in the modern press. In an unfathomable inversion of reality, and through an endless stream of baseless lies, propagandist Nicholas Kristof turns the victim into the accused. Israel - whose citizens were the victims of the most horrific sexual crimes committed by Hamas on October 7, and whose hostages were later subjected to further sexual abuse - is portrayed as the guilty party. This publication is no coincidence. It is part of a false and well-orchestrated anti-Israel campaign aimed at placing Israel on the UN Secretary-General’s blacklist. Israel will fight these lies with the truth - and the truth will prevail.

The fuckin president is asleep and the sec of health is ranting about teenage cum hahah why is this on the news

All of the recent attacks against me are false and obviously coordinated. In the past few weeks I have been attacked hard by the ADL, CBC, Washington Post, Tucker Carlson, Laura Loomer, and now Bilzerian. They want to shut me down and disrupt the Groypers ahead of 2026 & 2028.

Israel does not get to tell America that the "war is not over." The American people decide that. This war has cost us lives and raised the price of food and gas for Americans. End it now. thehill.com/policy/interna…