Paul

Manchester United Account Audits: Fans Hit with Draconian Information Demands Today, many Manchester United supporters began receiving emails stating they have violated ticketing rules. The club provided no specific details about what they are accused of doing, only a demand for extensive personal information as part of an appeals process. Let’s break down the email text. The Accusation The club opens with a boilerplate paragraph that seems to be attached to every sanction email they distribute: "Demand for match tickets at Old Trafford remains extremely high, and the Club has a responsibility to ensure tickets are accessed and used fairly by supporters. One of the most regular complaints we receive is around automated activity on our website, impacting genuine supporters when trying to purchase tickets." They follow this with the core allegation: "Following a detailed review of activity across our ticketing and digital platforms, we have identified sustained activity associated with your account, or with accounts that appear to be connected to or controlled by you, which may indicate a breach of the Club’s Ticketing Terms and Conditions." While this states that account activity indicates a breach of the terms and conditions, it fails to provide any specific evidence. A review of the actual terms shows no rules restricting a user from logging into their account from multiple devices or locations, provided it is done manually without ticket duplication or automated bot software. Therefore, these compliance audits should strictly target automated activity. However, based on the fans who have contacted me after being caught up in this sweep, I do not believe this is actually targeting actual bot users or people who simply refresh the page to catch a returned ticket. Given who is being targeted, United’s grounds for issuing these sanctions look incredibly weak—this is an area where a legal expert really needs to review the club's actions. Immediate Sanctions The club then details the immediate penalties being applied before the review is even complete: "As a result, your account has been temporarily restricted from making further transactions. Any tickets currently held for upcoming matches have also been deactivated while we complete our review." This aggressive approach is standard across all of their sanction communications. The Information Demands The email continues with an attempt at reassurance: "We understand that receiving this communication may be concerning. No final decision has been made, and there may be legitimate explanations for the activity identified. This process is intended to give you the opportunity to provide further information so that your circumstances can be reviewed fully and fairly." In reality, the club shows zero consideration for the well-being and anxiety of loyal supporters who receive these notices, especially when the evidence used to trigger these flags is flimsy at best. The club then lists the heavy administrative burden being placed on the fan: "To allow us to undertake a full review, please email a written response to appeals@manutd.co.ukby 8am on Monday 27 July. Your response must include: - Confirmation of every device regularly used to access your account, including mobile phones, tablets, laptops and desktop computers. - Confirmation of whether any of these devices are also used to access other ticketing accounts. Please provide the names of the account holders and explain why you access those accounts. - Confirmation of whether your account is regularly accessed from multiple locations. Please provide details of each location. - A brief explanation of how your account is accessed and managed, addressing each of the points above. - A copy of valid photographic identification. Note: This investigation is based on activity between March and Sunday 12 July, your response only needs to cover this timeframe." It is highly suspect that the investigation window covers up to July 12, well after the final game against Brighton on May 24. It is hard to see what kind of "suspicious activity" a Season Ticket holder could generate during the closed season, suggesting United may have been sitting on this data for nearly two months before acting for many. While the terms do not explicitly bar you from sharing your login details with a family member, a grey area arises if the club classifies account sharing as general "misuse" of a ticket or account. Doing so can inadvertently trigger the automated security flags meant for bots, which I believe is the angle they're using here, however flaky that approach is. I know many fans who have responsibly managed ticket applications for their entire match-going groups for decades because the away application system is easier to navigate that way. These people have never abused the system. Furthermore, demanding that supporters email copies of their passports or driving licenses is highly insecure. Sending unencrypted identity documents via email poses significant data privacy risks, and the club should not force fans to compromise their personal data security. If the club wants fans to utilise the "Strong Relationships" or "App Ticketing" features, it needs to make those systems secure and intuitive. Right now, the digital relationship setup is flawed, leaving everyone vulnerable to abuse. The Deadline and True Intentions The email concludes with a strict warning: "Please ensure your response is complete and accurate. We may be unable to conclude our review or lift the restrictions if the requested information is not provided by the deadline." The application deadline for the Hull City away fixture is July 29. It is highly doubtful the club will process these complex appeals by then, meaning falsely accused supporters will inevitably miss out on match applications. We have to look at the real motivation behind this sudden crackdown. If the club successfully revokes these Season Tickets, it is highly unlikely they will simply be handed down to the standard waiting list, which has been declining for years. Instead, this feels entirely revenue-driven. For a football club carrying massive financial debt, maximising income is the priority. Take a look at these previous posts for context: x.com/OhCheesesChris… x.com/OhCheesesChris… Clubs are well aware that they can generate significantly more revenue by selling a seat on a match-by-match basis for just six high-profile games than they make from an entire standard season ticket. This financial incentive appears to be the true driving force behind United's aggressive sanction strategy. What Affected Fans Should Do If you have been hit by this email, you need to act quickly: - File Your Appeal Immediately: Do not delay your response. - Push Back on the Email ID Demand: For the photographic ID requirement, tell the club to reference the official identification documents they already collected from you during the mandatory verification process ahead of the 25/26 season. If they refuse to use that data, demand that they provide a secure, encrypted portal to upload your documents rather than sending them via standard email. - Escalate If Unsuccessful: If your appeal is rejected by the club, immediately contact the Independent Supporter Liaison Officer (ISLO) at the Manchester United Supporters' Trust via islo@imust.org.uk for dedicated fan advocacy and support.

🚨 Man City pushing hard for Ayyoub Bouaddi from Lille. High among 18yo’s suitors (#PSG not in contention) & while others favour season on loan at #LOSC, #MCFC would integrate now. Price ~€100m + Morocco int’l expected to make decision soon @TheAthleticFC nytimes.com/athletic/74423…

🚨 Man City pushing hard for Ayyoub Bouaddi from Lille. High among 18yo’s suitors (#PSG not in contention) & while others favour season on loan at #LOSC, #MCFC would integrate now. Price ~€100m + Morocco int’l expected to make decision soon @TheAthleticFC nytimes.com/athletic/74423…