ina pinkney retweetledi

BREAKING: Anti-DEI purge IMPLODES as DOGE bro admits Holocaust survivors documentary was canceled for being about women.
A stunning deposition is exposing just how reckless the government’s anti-DEI crackdown has become.
A young staffer working for the Trump administration’s so-called Department of Government Efficiency — tasked with canceling federal grants under new anti-DEI rules — admitted under oath that he couldn’t even explain what “DEI” means, despite using the policy to terminate funding.
During questioning, the employee repeatedly insisted his understanding of diversity, equity, and inclusion was “exactly what was written in the executive order.”
There was just one problem. When asked what the executive order actually said… he couldn’t remember.
Pressed again and again by a lawyer to explain his understanding of DEI, the staffer kept repeating the same circular answer: that DEI meant whatever was written in the executive order he couldn’t recall.
Then came the jaw-dropping moment.
The lawyer asked why a government grant for a documentary about female Holocaust survivors had been canceled under the anti-DEI policy.
The staffer’s answer? Because the documentary focused on women.
According to the employee, telling the stories of women who survived the Holocaust was “inherently discriminatory” because it centered on a “gender-based story.”
When asked to clarify, he doubled down — claiming that amplifying “marginalized voices” of Jewish women made the project DEI.
In other words, a film about women who endured one of history’s worst atrocities was apparently considered too “diverse” to receive funding.
The deposition transcript shows the staffer struggling to defend the decision while his attorney repeatedly interrupted with objections as the questioning exposed the logic behind the cancellations.
And the exchange is now raising serious questions about how many grants were cut using the same shaky reasoning.
Because if the people enforcing anti-DEI rules can’t even define the policy they’re using — yet still feel empowered to cancel projects about Holocaust survivors — it reveals something deeply disturbing about how these decisions are being made.
Ideology first. Facts later.
Please like and share!

English






















