Brian O'Toole

5.8K posts

Brian O'Toole banner
Brian O'Toole

Brian O'Toole

@brianoftoole

Nonresident senior fellow at @atlanticcouncil; former Treasury/OFAC and IC. Opinions my own.

Katılım Ocak 2017
1.9K Takip Edilen3.1K Takipçiler
Brian O'Toole retweetledi
max seddon
max seddon@maxseddon·
A blank space on today’s WSJ A1 where Evan Gershkovich’s reporting should be, one year after his arrest on patently false charges. Russia should free him now
max seddon tweet media
English
42
504
1.6K
186.2K
Brian O'Toole
Brian O'Toole@brianoftoole·
Been waiting a while for this to land on my stoop from @SalehaMohsin. Can’t wait to dive in!
Brian O'Toole tweet media
English
0
0
5
552
Brian O'Toole
Brian O'Toole@brianoftoole·
I had expected more third country targets that are less fungible and would have had greater deterrent effect. This is more of the same approach, rather than any new ground in sanctions on Russia.
English
0
0
5
348
Brian O'Toole
Brian O'Toole@brianoftoole·
Big numbers but not big impact on the 2nd anniversary of Russia’s brutal war against Ukraine. Russia can easily replace these targets and the US will then have to find those new names to sanction, a game of whack a mole that is hard to win. reuters.com/world/biden-an….
English
1
1
7
370
Brian O'Toole retweetledi
Daniel Fried
Daniel Fried@AmbDanFried·
Big Russia sanctions list out. Broad but not as impactful as run-up rhetoric suggested. Lots of Russian companies in lots of relevant industrial sectors; some smaller Russian banks & the Russian payment card system; and some evasion targets (China, Serbia, UAE, others). @ACGeoEcon @brianoftoole 1/2 home.treasury.gov/news/press-rel…
English
6
65
153
40.8K
Brian O'Toole
Brian O'Toole@brianoftoole·
They took years to kill Navalny hoping you would be desensitized when they finally did. Their tactic in Ukraine is no different. Except we can do something about it.
English
0
4
7
1.3K
Esfandyar Batmanghelidj
Esfandyar Batmanghelidj@yarbatman·
@brianoftoole @dantannNYC @jp_koning No, in this case JP is right, which I am happy to admit. Sure it's hard to clear a dollar transaction without touching the US financial system but it is doable. I was under the wrong impression that dollar transactions outside the US system are subject to primary sanctions!
English
1
0
1
66
John Paul Koning
John Paul Koning@jp_koning·
Does transacting with non-USD local currency mean that new U.S. secondary sanctions don't apply? OFAC: Nope.
John Paul Koning tweet media
English
2
2
5
3K
Brian O'Toole
Brian O'Toole@brianoftoole·
@dantannNYC @yarbatman @jp_koning Everyone’s right! Dan is spot on the clearing piece being the issue. In practical terms though, very, very hard to do much book transfer volume without clearing in US.
English
1
0
2
42
Daniel Tannebaum
Daniel Tannebaum@dantannNYC·
@yarbatman @jp_koning @brianoftoole JP is right here. The nexus isn't the actual dollar, the nexus is the touchpoint with the physical US or US persons. That scenario of handling a USD book transfer in offshore accounts wouldn't subject it to US jurisdiction if it didn't clear through a US bank.
English
1
0
2
47
Brian O'Toole
Brian O'Toole@brianoftoole·
@m_mosier_ Knowledge is a factor for determining significance but no longer the formal bar (or, defense from sanctions) it used to be
English
0
0
2
99
Michael Mosier
Michael Mosier@m_mosier_·
@brianoftoole Good point. Typical 2ndary sanctions require "*knowingly* facilitate significant financial transactions on behalf." New EO: "conducted or facilitated any significant transaction for/on behalf." "Knowingly" often circumstantially shown, but now not even engage in that analysis.
English
1
0
1
187
Brian O'Toole
Brian O'Toole@brianoftoole·
Sneaky big deal. OFAC removed the typical knowledge threshold required to impose sanctions. Means OFAC doesn’t have to prove someone knew the transaction was problematic. Flip it around: people may have to worry about unknown unknowns re Russia payments.
Daniel Fried@AmbDanFried

Stand by for additional US financial sanctions against Russia. This would be the third significant sanctions tranche this month (others include new sectoral sanctions and tightening of oil price cap enforcement).

English
6
26
74
21.9K
Brian O'Toole
Brian O'Toole@brianoftoole·
This is a novel action and goes beyond similar sanctions imposed on Iran, North Korea, and terrorists. Predicting impact is hard since we haven’t seen this before. Opens OFAC’s aperture if they choose to use it. Will watch with great interest.
English
0
3
9
1.2K
Brian O'Toole
Brian O'Toole@brianoftoole·
@BrewerEricM It’s already restricted and can’t be formally “frozen” cause it’s not in the US. The US can simply refuse to allow any transactions on it by threatening to enforce existing sanctions, which would immobilize the funds.
English
1
1
2
602
Eric Brewer
Eric Brewer@BrewerEricM·
Would love to hear from OFAC experts (@brianoftoole ?) about what would be required to “freeze” the $6 billion, and what the implications might be for similar arrangements with other countries in the future.
Andrew Desiderio@AndrewDesiderio

McConnell & Cotton announce they’ll seek unanimous consent to pass legislation to freeze the $6 billion in Iranian assets that were released as part of a prisoner swap Comes as in-cycle Dems call for the funds to be frozen cotton.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/…

English
2
0
1
1.2K