Brian Ringley

22.6K posts

Brian Ringley banner
Brian Ringley

Brian Ringley

@brianringley

Katılım Ağustos 2009
289 Takip Edilen4.6K Takipçiler
Brian Ringley retweetledi
David J. Gunkel
David J. Gunkel@David_Gunkel·
RIP Daniel Dennett I began reading @danieldennett following the advice of @j2bryson, who pointed me to "Brainstorms" @mitpress and the essay "Why You Can't Make a Computer that Feels Pain." His work was pivotal for so many of us. A true giant in the philosophy of #AI.
David J. Gunkel tweet media
English
1
22
126
7.9K
Brian Ringley
Brian Ringley@brianringley·
@ikeough trying to picture you using Canva for the next Hypar Reel without insisting on rebuilding it yourself
English
1
0
3
213
Ian Keough
Ian Keough@ikeough·
Hypar's social media budget is soon to include buying my 15 year old fancy coffee so she will teach me Instagram.
English
2
0
13
1.1K
Brian Ringley
Brian Ringley@brianringley·
Predictably Spot-On Industrial Inspection | Boston Dynamics youtu.be/VVpgsd9Jsw0 Introducing Orbit fleet management and the Orbit site map
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
0
4
495
Brian Ringley retweetledi
DroneDeploy
DroneDeploy@DroneDeploy·
DroneDeploy + Trimble = high-accuracy by default Yes, you read that right, we’re partnering with Trimble Inc. to provide the industry’s most advanced PPK corrections. Learn more about how to achieve high accuracy here: lnkd.in/gccWQ2DC #realitycapture #dronemapping
DroneDeploy tweet media
English
0
1
5
868
Brian Ringley
Brian Ringley@brianringley·
Tune-in Tuesday, February 13th as we unveil Orbit™, Boston Dynamics all-new fleet management software for Spot. Orbit is your portal for managing asset-intensive facilities through real-time and predictive intelligence youtu.be/zb_3Phq3v98?fe…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
0
3
391
Brian Ringley retweetledi
Darrell Etherington
Darrell Etherington@etherington·
One week post-TechCrunch, I'm starting my own newsletter! It's called @TheAngle (yes I've been sitting on this domain for 6 years) and you can sign up at TheAngle.com
English
20
32
284
26.5K
Brian Ringley retweetledi
Boston Dynamics
Boston Dynamics@BostonDynamics·
Can't trip Atlas up! Our humanoid robot gets ready for real work combining strength, perception, and mobility.
English
226
1.1K
5.2K
700K
Ian Keough
Ian Keough@ikeough·
Twitter friends, has anyone ever seen someone trying to space plan in Bluebeam? How do they do it? Areas? Flooring? Custom stamps?
English
13
2
12
5K
Brian Ringley retweetledi
Haldun
Haldun@haltor·
Haldun tweet media
QME
6
89
804
72.1K
Brian Ringley
Brian Ringley@brianringley·
wonder what it would be like to be a designer or PM for such a long-standing product. like, it must be impossible to please anyone
Elizabeth Laraki@elizlaraki

15 years ago, I helped design Google Maps. I still use it everyday. Last week, the team dramatically changed the map’s visual design. I don’t love it. It feels colder, less accurate and less human. But more importantly, they missed a key opportunity to simplify and scale. ––– Google Maps has started to widely roll out updated map colors: - All roads are now gray - Water changed from blue to teal - Parks and open spaces are now mint green It seems the goal was to improve usability and make the maps more readable. Admittedly, I do think major roads, traffic, and trails stand out more now. But the colors of water and parks/open spaces blend together. And to me, the palette feels colder and more computer generated. But color choices aside… If the goal was better usability, the team missed a big opportunity: Google Maps should have cleaned up the crud overlaying the map. ––– So much stuff has accumulated on top of the map. Currently there are ~11 different elements obscuring it: - Search box - 8 pills overlayed in 4 rows - A peeking card for “latest in the area” - A bottom nav bar (Personally, I would LOVE to see usage metrics for all these overlays.) The map should be sacred real estate. Only things that are highly useful to many people should obscure it. There should be a very limited number of features that can cover the map view. And there are multiple ways to add new features without overlaying them directly on the map. ––– Here’s how it could look: - Keep the search box - Keep the bottom bar - Remove everything else from the map - Roll the most used features into the bottom bar - Bury the less used features elsewhere in the app I assume the search box and directions are top priority and should remain prominent. My Location and map layers (satellite, traffic, etc.) could move to the bottom bar. The explore overlays (restaurants, gas, etc.) could live in the bottom bar in “Explore” and open as cards. The additional space in the bottom bar could be used for Saved, as a “More” option, or could be removed entirely. There are many variations of how features could be arranged. But the key points are: - Dramatically simplify - Strongly prioritize map visibility - Bury legacy and low use features ––– It’s normal for products to accumulate features over time. But it’s also super important to stay vigilant and continually clean them up. In many ways, it’s interesting to see history repeating itself. In 2007, I was 1 of 2 designers on Google Maps. At that time, Maps had already become a cluttered mess. We were wedging new features into any space we could find in the UI. The user experience was suffering and the product was growing increasingly complicated. We had to rethink the app to be simple and scale for the future. It seems like it’s time for Google Maps to do this again… ––– For more on design + tips for early stage founders, follow me on X: @elizlaraki

English
0
0
1
962
Brian Ringley
Brian Ringley@brianringley·
i know ive aged out of the game when it becomes de rigeur to sh*t on contemporary dutch architecture, THE ONE TRUE STYLE, absolutely sacrosanct when i was in school
English
0
0
1
552