Fourth Brother

34.5K posts

Fourth Brother

Fourth Brother

@brother_fourth

Katılım Eylül 2019
137 Takip Edilen81 Takipçiler
Fourth Brother retweetledi
Ounka
Ounka@OunkaOnX·
Tim Dillon: "We cannot go to war with China. It will destroy all life on Earth. We're not the high school bully anymore. We're the weird kid who may have a gun. The American quarterback century is over." America lost its soft power, its economic dominance, its moral authority, and its cool factor. All that's left is a violence
English
153
1K
5.4K
131.9K
Fourth Brother retweetledi
Prem Sikka
Prem Sikka@premnsikka·
Campaigners threaten legal action over UK-US deal on prices NHS pays for drugs. Govt appeased Trump, agreed to pay £64bn more over the next decade to drugs companies. No impact assessment, no debate in parliament. All part of unchecked corporate welfare. theguardian.com/society/2026/m…
English
29
1.1K
1.4K
23.7K
Fourth Brother retweetledi
Samira Mohyeddin سمیرا
Israel just shredded people alive again. Bombing a Turkish charity soup kitchen and its workers in Deir Balah. Yesterday @WCKitchen announced it has halted activities in Gaza because Israel is not allowing “the essential supplies for cooking to enter.”
Samira Mohyeddin سمیرا tweet media
English
70
2.8K
4.3K
179.2K
Fourth Brother retweetledi
China en Español
China en Español@ChinaEnEsp·
🇨🇳Mientras Trump visitaba Beijing, los ciudadanos chinos dieron su opinión sincera ante los medios. Una joven lo resumió perfectamente. “Trump no actúa como un líder nacional… parece más un celebrity de internet, buscando atención todo el tiempo. Sus acciones se centran solo en sí mismo.” Los chinos notan claramente la diferencia entre una China en pleno desarrollo y un estilo superficial y egocéntrico. China recibe a los líderes del mundo con respeto y civilización… pero su pueblo no se deja impresionar por shows. ¿Qué te parece la percepción de los ciudadanos chinos sobre Trump?
Español
1.2K
4.5K
16K
601.7K
Fourth Brother retweetledi
Sony Thăng
Sony Thăng@nxt888·
The argument that Palestinians are recent immigrants to their own land was constructed specifically to make dispossession disappear. If they just got there, they have no roots. If they have no roots, they have no claim. If they have no claim, 1948 was not dispossession. If 1948 was not dispossession, there are no refugees. If there are no refugees, there is nothing to resolve. The argument is not history. It is the legal and moral case for the Nakba, assembled backwards from the conclusion it needs to reach. Historians, including Israeli ones, have examined the Ottoman census records, the land registries, the village surveys conducted by the British Mandate. The population was there. It was majority Arab. For centuries. No debunked 1984 book changes the Ottoman land registry.
English
6
46
173
2.1K
Fourth Brother retweetledi
BladeoftheSun
BladeoftheSun@BladeoftheS·
If you look at what Andy Burnham is offering. It is exactly what Keir Starmer said he'd do in his pledges when he was running for Labour Leader. Literally word for word. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me
BladeoftheSun tweet media
English
98
1.4K
2.6K
35K
Fourth Brother retweetledi
Sana Saeed
Sana Saeed@SanaSaeed·
Every Biden admin resignee I spoke to in 2024 pointed to 4 people as the leading genocidaires who intentionally stood in the way of stopping the eradication of Palestinians, pushing for it to continue: Joe Biden, Antony Blinken, Jake Sullivan and Brett McGurk.
English
46
2.5K
8.3K
231.4K
Fourth Brother retweetledi
Wokerati Marty
Wokerati Marty@WokeratiMarty·
Last year, Channel 4 did a piece on Tommy Robinson’s fake feminist friends, Collectif Némésis, who carried out the racist niqab stunt in London yesterday. They’re shunned by mainstream feminism because all they’re really interested in is the weaponisation of racism.
English
18
395
1.1K
32.1K
Fourth Brother retweetledi
Gianl1974
Gianl1974@Gianl1974·
She Called The FBI In 1996. They Opened A File. Then They Told Her It Never Existed. She Spent 29 Years Being Called A Liar. September 3, 1996. A file is opened inside FBI headquarters. Classification: child pornography. The woman who made the call is identified only as "a professional artist." She described photos she had seen inside a Manhattan mansion. She described the man who owned those photos. She described what she witnessed being done to young girls. She gave them everything. Then she waited. Nobody called back. Nine years later, a local detective in Palm Beach knocked on a different door. Found forty victims. Handed the FBI photographs, videos, and documented evidence of child trafficking across multiple states. The FBI opened a formal investigation. Two years later — they closed it. One plea deal. Thirteen months. Out by noon every day on work release. The trafficking continued. The FBI kept receiving tips. For eleven more years, women were brought to his island, his Manhattan townhouse, his private ranch. For eleven more years — the file sat there. It took a newspaper reporter to force the arrest in 2019. Thirty-three days later, he was dead. Now twelve women — listed only as Doe 1 through Doe 12 — are standing in federal court. They're not suing his estate. They're suing the FBI. They want $100 million. And they want every internal document, every memo, every email showing exactly who received each tip — and made the decision to do nothing. But here's the part that changes everything. When the FBI's own internal review was published in 2020 — it didn't mention the 1996 complaint. Not once. For another five years, the woman who made that call was told: your report doesn't exist. In December 2025, the DOJ confirmed it did. One page. Dated September 3, 1996. Which means someone inside the FBI knew that file existed — and chose not to include it in their own review. The question isn't whether the file was real. The question is: who decided to make it disappear?
Gianl1974 tweet media
English
178
5.6K
8.1K
81.3K
Fourth Brother retweetledi
Peter Sterne
Peter Sterne@petersterne·
Jesus fucking christ. They made a woman appear for a criminal court arraignment even though she was 9 months pregnant and she gave birth while handcuffed to a bench *inside the courtroom*
Peter Sterne tweet media
English
195
3.8K
9.9K
296.2K
Fourth Brother retweetledi
James Wood 武杰士
James Wood 武杰士@commiepommie·
🇺🇸 Bret Baier From Fox News Called China’s Cameras a ‘Communist Nightmare.’ But Ended Up Making A Fool Out Of Himself Instead 🇨🇳 Bret Baier of Fox News tried to paint Beijing’s traffic cameras as some kind of dystopian communist nightmare. His crew got fined on the spot after their driver parked illegally. “There are cameras everywhere,” he gasped live, claiming one intersection had at least 20 of them, resulting in a $40 ticket sent straight to their phone. That’s a typical Western media gotcha, isn’t it? You are mistaken. A video that surfaced online showed them doing something completely stupid. During Beijing’s morning rush hour, Baier and his team were standing right in the middle of a busy non-motorised bike lane filming. E-bikes and scooters swerving around them, his cameraman walking backwards and blocking the flow. Meanwhile, they lectured the world on Chinese regulations. Chinese netizens and even Americans online called it for what it was. One American wrote: “He should praise Chinese drivers for not running him over. He doesn’t represent us Americans. Just put him away, he’s a disgrace. It’s disrespectful how audacious he is in another country.” Another put it this way: “Obviously you are trying to provoke the law. Filming on a busy road like this, who does that?” And another: “Imagine if a Chinese news team came to America and did this, Fox would have a fit. You don’t need to stand in the road to film traffic. What morons.” The actual fine was 200 RMB, roughly 28 to 29 US dollars. Baier said 40. Slight overstatement or a miscalculation, but it fit the narrative. This had nothing to do with surveillance horror. It was straightforward traffic enforcement that kept the flow of Beijing’s streets safe for everyone. No special treatment for foreign TV crews, no warnings, just the system working as designed. Rules applied universally. That’s order, not authoritarianism. What’s worth noting is how different this looks from the ground compared to the “Big Brother” narrative Western media usually runs. Millions of visitors a year experience it directly: walking alone at night without worry, packages left unattended on streets, lost phones returned intact. The security that Baier ridiculed is what makes that possible. Western media frames China’s technology and governance through that lens every time. But whenever someone from the West experiences it firsthand, the story shifts. Baier saw cameras. The people walking these streets feel protected from the disorder that’s common in plenty of Western cities. The smear campaign is losing steam. More foreigners are seeing it for themselves and the gap between the narrative and the reality keeps narrowing. That’s not spin. That’s just what it looks like when people actually look.
James Wood 武杰士 tweet mediaJames Wood 武杰士 tweet media
English
28
165
863
36.7K
Fourth Brother retweetledi
𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦
Lindsey Graham still thinks the year is 2003 and Washington can terrify China by waving sanctions around. This is adorable. China’s manufacturing capacity is over 30% of the world. Larger than the entire G7 combined. China’s GDP by PPP has already surpassed the U.S. by more than one-third. China-U.S. trade exposure has been falling to historic lows, while China’s markets, supply chains, energy routes, and export destinations are becoming more diversified. And this clown still thinks America can press a sanctions button and make China kneel. Taiwan is China’s internal matter. It is not American territory. It is not NATO territory. It is not Lindsey Graham’s campaign prop. The U.S. can sanction, tariff, threaten, scream, and perform moral panic on cable TV. But sanctions are not sovereignty. Tariffs are not deterrence. And American domestic rage is not international law. Washington keeps mistaking its sanctions machine for global power. But a machine that only works when others obey is not power. It is habit. And China is breaking the habit.
English
24
123
483
11.7K
Fourth Brother retweetledi
John Rees
John Rees@JohnWRees·
This is absolutely pathetic. Paul has been on countless protests, inc. all the Free Assange protests, dressed as the grim reaper to dramatise the death of British justice. The Metropolitan Police just proved his case. @Stella_Assange @ChloeSchlosberg @SwaziJAF @pamelaanderson
Middle East Eye@MiddleEastEye

Police arrested a man dressed as the Grim Reaper during the Nakba Day protest in London on Saturday. Footage appears to show an officer telling the man that he is under arrest using powers granted under the Public Order Act

English
16
276
410
6.6K
Fourth Brother retweetledi
jack
jack@actionjack69·
His guys story is that they had a heated argument, they calmed down, and then he took her upstairs to “show her his gun” and it accidentally went off and killed her. And Texas prosecutors were like yeah that checks out you’re free to go lmfaooo
GOP Ls@GOP__Ls

🚨 A Republican Dad shot and killed his liberal daughter after an argument about Trump. Just before killing her, he told her that he would “not be upset” if Trump sexually assaulted her.

English
244
9.8K
174.2K
6.2M
Fourth Brother retweetledi
Carole Cadwalladr
Carole Cadwalladr@carolecadwalla·
Gosh. Guardian reports CPS warned Yvette Cooper that her Observer op-ed about Palestine Action risked prejudicing jury. That’s contempt - an imprisonable offence for both author & publisher…what likelihood any action taken? 🤔
Carole Cadwalladr tweet media
Carole Cadwalladr@carolecadwalla

The Observer today ‘both-sided’ the proscription of Palestine Action. It published op-eds by both Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, & the founder of PA. That’s not a position the historically liberal Observer would likely have historically taken but it’s certainly a defensible one. 2/

English
48
1.6K
3.1K
94.9K