A K
44.6K posts

A K retweetledi
A K retweetledi

1. Sangram Patil’s post wasn’t an ordinary rant against the Indian PM. It was a deliberate hit-job with serious allegations linking the PM to a sex scandal without any evidence, substance, facts whatsoever. No law or Constitution allows this and Patil should’ve been life imprisoned for this! Consider the PM benevolent he let Patil off!
2. Ask Patil to open his mouth and conduct such hit-job against Keir Starmer while living in the UK being on a British passport! Within 24 hours of such a conduct if Patil doesn’t get arrested, let us know!
3. Do your research before writing such half-baked emotional waffles!
English
A K retweetledi

It wasn’t just an ‘anti-BJP’ post. There are lakhs of anti-BJP posts floating around the internet. He wrote a defamatory post linking the PM to a sex scandal with zero proof. That’s libel. Our own Shri Jawaharlal Nehru brought in the first amendment to our Constitution in all his wisdom applying ‘reasonable’ restrictions to free speech after which he jailed poet Majrooh Sultanpuri for calling him ‘Hitler ka chela’. Also, OCI is a privilege, not a right. The doctor has every right to comment on the politics of any country he wishes but there will be consequences if the post is utter lies or defamatory in nature.
Sanghamitra@AudaciousQuest_
Dr Sangram Patil, a British-Indian NHS consultant, was blocked from leaving India over an anti-BJP post. In four months, he says, he spent Rs 50 lakh in legal fees just to get home and save his job. He finally boarded a flight home Tuesday. He is still asking the question that has haunted him: "How can a 12-word post attract an FIR & LOC?" These are the days.
English
A K retweetledi

Rich people need to have more kids, not poor ones.
Give tax breaks for people having more kids.
If one kid: tax exemption Upto ₹3L
Two kids: tax exemption Upto ₹7L
Three kids: tax exemption Upto ₹12L
Fourth kid: tax exemption Upto ₹15L
Fifth kid: tax exemption Upto ₹20L
You’ll see rich people having atleast 3 kids.
English
A K retweetledi
A K retweetledi

@ShoaibIND if it happens it will bring goodwill trust mutual respect and understanding
English
A K retweetledi
A K retweetledi
A K retweetledi

Lawyer Brings To Supreme Court's Notice Udhayanidhi Stalin's Remarks Against Sanatana Dharma In TN Assembly |@1Simranbakshi
#SupremeCourt #SanatanaDharma #UdhayanidhiStalin #TamilNadu
livelaw.in/top-stories/la…
English
A K retweetledi
A K retweetledi

A K retweetledi
A K retweetledi
A K retweetledi

Is it only me or does anyone else think the a section of great thinkers at the Indian Revenue Service wanted to impose a surcharge for foreign travel and other foreign related stuff, didn't know how it would be received, so they leaked it to the press to understand public reaction but were nipped in the bud by the PM himself?
Mind you this is the same esteemed organization that wrote a paper declaring their intent to impose more taxes and cess to improve India's fiscal position due to Covid.
The IRS unfortunately has ossified so much, that they can never think of anything other than increasing tax, cess, comploaice, penalty or fine, to improve India's fiscal position.
For them everything is a nail that needs to hit with the sledgehammer of tax.
English
A K retweetledi
A K retweetledi

Kalyan Banerjee is inciting the public to hit the streets to save Democracy.
Booth capturing, rapes, political violence & bomb culture had kept Democracy alive in Bengal.
@KolkataPolice this is serious. TMC is planning unrest.
English
A K retweetledi

1987. A room in New Delhi is thick with the smell of old files & cold tea. The United States has just delivered a stinging slap to the face of the Indian Republic. They have officially refused to sell India the 'Cray X-MP' Supercomputer, the most powerful machine on Earth, claiming that India would use it for nuclear weapons.
The American officials mockingly suggest that India does not even have the electricity to keep such a machine running. In the middle of this national humiliation, a young, soft-spoken engineer named Vijay Bhatkar is asked by then Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi: "Can we build our own?" Bhatkar does not hesitate. He looks at the No of the West & says: "We will not just build it; we will build it faster than you can ship it."
The Americans did not just stop at refusing the sale; they actively lobbied other nations to ensure India remained digitally blind. They believed that w/o their Logic Gates, India would remain a 3rd world backwater.
Bhatkar realized he could not replicate the Single-Processor behemoth of the Cray. Instead, he turned to Parallel Processing. He decided to stitch together 1000s of low-cost, off-the-shelf microprocessors. It was like building a giant's brain out of the neurons of ants.
In 1991, while the West was still celebrating its monopoly, Bhatkar unveiled the PARAM 8000. It was not just a computer; it was a Gigaflop monster.
To prove the PARAM was real, Bhatkar ran a standard global benchmark test. The results were sent to an international conference in Zurich. The PARAM 8000 was ranked as the 2nd most powerful supercomputer in the world, behind only the American machines. But there was a twist: the PARAM cost a fraction of the Cray, performed better in tropical heat, & was built in just 3 years.
When the PARAM 8000 was 1st turned on, the team did not have a high-tech cooling system like the Americans. They used industrial-grade desert coolers & adjusted the airflow manually. It was the ultimate Jugaad that defeated the most sophisticated tech embargo in history.
A major US newspaper ran a story with the headline: "Denied supercomputer, Angry India does it!" The ghost of the Native Engineer had officially entered the silicon temple. Vijay Bhatkar’s history is the story of how India became the IT Capital of the world.
Bhatkar founded the Centre for Development of Advanced Computing (C-DAC). He did not just build a machine; he built an ecosystem. Every software engineer in India today stands on the shoulders of the man who proved we did not need the West's permission to compute. Bhatkar was the 1 who realized that if computers only spoke English, 90% of India would be left behind. He led the development of GIST (Graphics & Intelligence Based Script Technology), allowing computers to work in Indian languages. He gave the Machine a local tongue.
Today, Bhatkar is a Padma Bhushan awardee, but he lives a life of deep spirituality & simplicity. He vanished from the corporate headlines to become a philosopher of the digital age.
The West thought they could freeze India’s future by withholding a single machine. They forgot that the Indian mind does not need a 'Cray' to think; it only needs a 'No' to ignite. Forget building a supercomputer; Bhatkar built a mirror, & for the 1st time, the West had to look into it & see that the primitive colony had become the master of the code.


English
A K retweetledi

Manoj Madhusudhanan took a ₹1.86 crore home loan from ICICI Bank.
As collateral, he handed over his original property documents. Every homebuyer does this. You have no choice.
ICICI Bank sent those documents to their storage facility in Hyderabad via courier. Somewhere on that journey — Bangalore to Hyderabad — the documents vanished.
Gone. Originals. Irreplaceable.
When Manoj found out, ICICI Bank had one answer: it was the courier company's fault. Not ours.
He went to the Banking Ombudsman. They told ICICI to publish a public notice about the loss and pay him ₹25,000 for the trouble.
Twenty-five thousand rupees. For losing the original documents to a ₹1.86 crore property.
Manoj sent a legal notice. ICICI denied any mistake.
He went to the NCDRC.
The apex consumer court looked at the facts. The bank had taken custody of the documents. The bank had chosen the courier. The bank could not hand that liability to a third party and walk away.
ICICI Bank — India's second-largest private bank, ₹9 lakh crore in assets — was held liable. Ordered to obtain reconstructed certified copies, issue an indemnity bond, and pay ₹25 lakh in compensation.
One loan. One lost file. One bank that blamed the courier.
Save this — if your bank loses your original property documents, they cannot blame their courier agent. The documents were in their custody. The liability is theirs. File at your district consumer forum. The law is on your side.
(Source: Manoj Madhusudhanan vs. ICICI Bank Ltd. | NCDRC | LiveLaw, September 2023)
English














