bruderbuck.oO🦇🔊🐼(🌳,🌳)

There it is! This little thing is currently syncing @nethermind and @ethnimbus and it is looking good doing it. Used @EthereumOnARM to set it up which made it very easy. Looking forward to run a @Rocket_Pool minipool on it in the future 🚀 #stakefromhome #Ethereum

@koeppelmann Ethereum 34 Optimism 111 Arbitrum 147 Polygon 621 Base 28 Gnosis 2

Whats your nonce? Ethereum: 1500 Gnosis: 1365 Polygon: 26 Optimism: 23 Arbitrum: 19 Base: 1

@gnosispay @monerium I really like the gnosis pay card, what I'm missing at the moment is the ability to add it to my Google wallet to pay with the phone.

🟢 Nearly €600k traded with Gnosis Pay cards this week – the growth trend continues! 🟢 Our users are enjoying up to 5% cashback, and soon IBAN will be available to all EUR users, powered by @monerium It’s just the beginning 🦉

@TINONEU369 @domothy @ultrasoundmoney ultrasound.money blobscan.com fees-growthepie.streamlit.app

the blob burn has started 3 ETH burned in 30 minutes

@peternoszek Are you telling me the Klima I held with my green diamond hands are coming back to being worth something 🥹💚

$KLIMA 4.20. Wild.

@Kal_Ort_Por_ But still it is limited. Only a certain amount of data can be displayed for 18 days.

@mcutler It was kind of only a matter of time. Blob space was virtually free before, so of course someone launches a protocol that let you put stuff on Ethereum for two weeks. It will be interesting to see what the equilibrium will be

🚨 Heads up: the Blob Base Fee is currently rising exponentially. We are investigating potential causes. You can monitor on Ethernow.xyz. Click through to see underlying Type 3 transactions.

@CantelopePeel Have a look at @benjaminion_xyz eth2 book. It's available online.

Can anyone point me to a detailed specification of Ethereum's CL networking protocols?

@scupytrooples @LefterisJP @MoonwellDeFi @base L2s gonna have to boost their execution. Beefier sequencers and L2 nodes I suppose

@LefterisJP @MoonwellDeFi @base look at all this blockspace it’s so cheap and fast > ppl start using it oops

"Just wait lefteris. It's gonna get better". Exact same action. 1 day later. 10x more expensive. And no you fanboys. I did not cherry pick anything. I just opened rabby and tried to claim @MoonwellDeFi with default settings. Gas in @base is higher than mainnet right now.

@sassal0x @l2beat That's amazing and arbitrum has at least permissions fraud proofs so far. @arbitrum wen permissionless fraud proofs??

@bruderbuck @l2beat OP Stack permissionless fraud proofs are on testnet atm - mainnet soon!

Everyday I'm checking the layer 2 activity tab and it's ripping. Everyday I check the activity tab on @l2beat, all time high activity. Can the devs keep doing whatever they're doing because this is based af

@TomFragt @verkehrswendeb2 @Elektro_Robin Wow das hat es ziemlich genau auf den Punkt gebracht

@verkehrswendeb2 @Elektro_Robin Im Grunde ist es ganz einfach: Menschen stehen eine Stunde früher auf, damit sie am Abend eine Stunde mehr vom Tag haben. Da sie aber ungern eine Stunde früher aufstehen, verstellen sie die Uhren, damit sie es nicht merken.

@daniel_knopik @vdWijden Die Transaktionen müssen geyeetet werden

Discussing EIPs the hard way: the in-flight entertainment chat system

@EthereumOnARM But the point of a L2 is to take the execution load off the back of L1s where all the smaller nodes live. Sooner or later L1 type hardware will not be able to follow any more but that's fine because of easily verifiable zk proofs and DAS.

Totally disagree. An L2 that cannot be run on commodity hardware isn't decentralized enough. Why should we be using a chain that depends on a cluster of nodes that controls it. If you want performance, you can use many services such as Google or AWS. Decentralization matters.

@mert Thx for the clarification

there is a stat going around CT about failed transactions on Solana it is misleading and 90% of the people using it don't know what it means I will explain (for non-technical folks only) first, an example of how a usual interaction in web2 works: - you go on twitter and click on my profile - this changes the URL to: "x. com / 0xmert_" - what's happening here is the X site (called 'the client') is requesting data from the X servers (called 'the server') - it's saying "hey server, give me data about 0xmert_" a) in most cases, the X servers will say "ok, here's the data" — this is a successful response (called a "200") so: the client made a request and the server responded successfully b) in some cases, the X servers might be broken and will respond with a "500" response, indicating the server has a fault so: the client made a request and the server responded un-successfully ok here's the important part: c) there are some cases where the client might make a bad request to the server (you have actually all seen this before, for example: a 404, page not found, maybe you mispelled mert somehow) — the server tells you this so that you can make a better request (this might also be something like: 401 — Unauthorized — meaning you don't have the credentials to view a certain resource) so: the client made a bad request and the server responded successfully ok now let's loop it back to Solana - when you see something that says "failed" on a Solana explorer, this represents c) above (note: there is more nuance to it but this is meant for non-technical people) so: the chain processed the request successfully, but the smart contract said: "wait a minute, this request is bad" why would the smart contract do this? some obvious reasons: i) you do not have the right permissions to call this smart contract ii) since you called the smart contract, the markets moved and exceeded your slippage tolerance iii) a bot was spamming for arbitrage and the arbitrage doesn't exist anymore note that this is different from b) above — the chain/server is *not* down, it is doing what the smart contract is telling it to do it is important to make this distinction because i) if you're not precise about the problem, you can't fix it properly ii) it uses the same network resources, which is important to understand for scale + uptime considerations sorry, I'm not done there is also a case of terminology being overloaded here the above chart says the word "failed" transaction but in the context of solana this is a specific term — similar to the 200, 400, and 500 numbers I mentioned above when most users say "failed", they are broadly referring to their transaction not becoming successful, they don't care why it "failed", they just care it didn't work currently, the most common reason for this is that transactions don't make it on to the chain in the first place (they get dropped because block leaders can only handle so many at once) — this is a problem, but a separate one the chart above is referring to something else it represents transactions that didn't get dropped and were successfully submitted to the chain and the smart contract made a deliberate decision to tell you that it's a bad request this is usually not a big problem for users because your wallet will simulate the txn and let you know that it will not work beforehand anyway and so almost all failed txns you see on these charts are bot spam (and this has always been a thing, failed txn rates have been too high since months ago, people are now just noticing the dropped txn issue and conflating it with this one instead) the reason I wrote this is because people are using this chart to say solana's throughput is "fake" or that it is down — this is not the case since it exerts the same system load the chart also importantly doesn't accurately capture the user experience since the overwhelming number of issues are before the txns even make it to the block however, it does show that the system allows for too much spam with negligible economic activity in fact, if that problem were fixed current revenue numbers (and throughput) would increase a ton importantly: we all understand that this is a problem and so this is all being fixed there are many talks and proposals on tackling these issues i) adding better logic so that block leaders don't drop proper transactions (this is the big one today) ii) adding better incentives and fee markets so bots don't find it +EV to spam the chain user experience will continue to get better as we put the systems to the limit and iterate via learnings

@CoinbaseCloud @nethermind 👍👍👍

We have completed our initial rollout and are pleased to report that roughly 50% of our validators are now running on @nethermind

@nicksvyaznoy @q9fcc Haha current prices for electricity are 31,89€/kWh in Germany.

@q9fcc How expensive are German electricity bills? :)

finally wall-mounted my ethereum validators

@dcinvestor @Rabby_io @MetaMask What do you guys use for mobile wallet? So far I still have to use m€t4mask since all the others have other problems or don't even have a dapp browser. Best I could find is coin base wallet. What do you use?

like everyone else here, i’m asking you to try @Rabby_io as your Ethereum wallet i tried it several months ago and it blew my mind on how good it actually is i cannot and will not recommend @MetaMask again until serious changes are made would love to change that view one day

@AdrianoFeria @QwQiao Is this how Solana votes for the head of the chain?

@QwQiao Can you add $ETH consensus attestations as if they were actual transactions to make it a fair comparison to Solana?

y-axis is misleading but in feb solana did more tx than all chains on this chart combined

@niarbnotna I want to have the option to filter by chain

What do you prefer: to see all your tokens on all networks straight away or segmented by the network?