

Trump: We can't take care of daycare. We're a big country. We're fighting wars. It's not possible for us to take care of daycare, Medicaid, Medicare, all these things.
Brandon Charpied
5.3K posts

@btcharpied
DBA, Organizational Behavior • Non-Profit Executive • ED of @OBTS1 & @iacm_conflict • Jaguars 🐆 • CCU Chanticleers 🐓 • Toledo Rockets 🚀 • 🇺🇸 & 🇱🇺 Citizen


Trump: We can't take care of daycare. We're a big country. We're fighting wars. It's not possible for us to take care of daycare, Medicaid, Medicare, all these things.


One of the recurring mistakes in technology policy is to assume that every new tool requires a new body of law. But a recent Nebraska amicus brief gets it exactly right. In a case involving hallucinated case citations in court filings, the Nebraska AG and SG argue against AI-specific ethics or certification rules. I agree that the better view is that the existing rules of professional conduct already do the work. Lawyers have long owed duties of competence and diligence. If a lawyer files fabricated authority—whether because of sloppiness, copy-paste errors, or blind reliance on an LLM—the problem doesn't have much to do with AI. It's that the lawyer has violated ordinary professional obligations. Nebraska's DOJ deserves credit for taking the right approach here. There is always temptation to grandstand about AI, to stoke fear, or to pile on special disclosure and certification requirements that make practice more cumbersome while adding little of substance. But rules aimed specifically at “AI misuse” often just duplicate duties lawyers already have, while increasing complexity, compliance costs, and the risk that useful innovation gets chilled. That is a healthy model for legal adaptation to new technology: enforce general principles faithfully, resist bespoke panic, and add new law only when old law truly fails. (Note that the Fourth Circuit’s recent public admonishment points in the same direction, In re Erich Chibueze Nwaubani. The court sanctioned a lawyer who cited nonexistent cases, applying the rules already on the books to do so.) Thanks to Eric Goldman for flagging the Fourth Circuit case, and to Zachary Pohlman for sharing his brief to the Nebraska Supreme Court. He's #3 on the brief, which, for the benefit of my law students, means he did A LOT of the heavy lifting on this! #LegalEthics #AI #TechnologyPolicy






This is why @ToledoWBB is different! Averaged 4200+ last season and on pace for top 30 in the country again this year 👏🏻 We 🤍our 🚀fans!






🚨2026 Football HOF Class🚨 POF reviews the 2026 Football Hall of Fame class. We cover: 🏈 Is Brees a Top 10 QB All-Time? 🗻 Does Fitzgerald Belong on WR Rushmore? 🏈 Kuechly's Destructive 2015 Playoff Run 🤯 Belichick HOF Snub 🐐 Is Vinatieri the GOAT? open.spotify.com/episode/69PNc4…



