Dylan Lamb

3.7K posts

Dylan Lamb banner
Dylan Lamb

Dylan Lamb

@bydylanlamb

Marketing ops in luxury hospitality. AI enablement. Vincere aut mori.

London, UK Katılım Nisan 2010
422 Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler
NearestCommit
NearestCommit@NearestCommit·
Modern thumbnails be like
NearestCommit tweet media
English
65
50
3.1K
159.3K
Eliezer Yudkowsky
Eliezer Yudkowsky@allTheYud·
Naming their next model after Cthulhu makes it hard to take Anthropic seriously as the good guys. It's fun at any other software company, not one that actually is flirting with extinction.
Jimmy Apples 🍎/acc@apples_jimmy

“ A draft blog post that was available in an unsecured and publicly-searchable data store prior to Thursday evening said the new model is called “Claude Mythos” and that the company believes it poses unprecedented cybersecurity risks. “

English
69
5
206
168.2K
Tariq Khan
Tariq Khan@tariqkhanfmd·
@DhruvalGolakiya true. even a simple “hey” with Opus 4.6 in Cowork Mode already uses 4% of the current session.
Tariq Khan tweet media
English
5
0
43
2.1K
Dhruval
Dhruval@DhruvalGolakiya·
Maybe claude should just remove $20/m plan at this point? I don't see any reason why anyone will or be able to use that plan, 4-5 prompts and you are out of limit
Thariq@trq212

To manage growing demand for Claude we're adjusting our 5 hour session limits for free/Pro/Max subs during peak hours. Your weekly limits remain unchanged. During weekdays between 5am–11am PT / 1pm–7pm GMT, you'll move through your 5-hour session limits faster than before.

English
104
13
1K
81.4K
Ben Tossell
Ben Tossell@bentossell·
@clairekart let me help you out claire im rich ive got 3 kids i spend all day tinkering and investing thanks for worrying about me
English
17
2
259
22.9K
lilchiva
lilchiva@lilchiva·
@bydylanlamb @jeffreyhuber Here I would also point out that Sam Altman bought up the global supply chain of RAM and whined about Anthropic banning OAI's API from their servers. So, not only are you full of shit about this conversation, you're full of shit about you examples. Go fuck with someone else.
English
1
0
0
26
lilchiva
lilchiva@lilchiva·
While I'm excited to see what Jeff's project is. I have to tell you that you can host your own search for free and it's generally faster or as fast as regular search engines.
Jeff Huber@jeffreyhuber

the bitter lesson is coming for search we're open-sourcing Context-1 - a model that is better, faster, and cheaper than any frontier model at searching we published a 40-page technical report on our website with the ins and outs of how we did it. this is just step 1

English
1
0
4
1.2K
Dylan Lamb
Dylan Lamb@bydylanlamb·
How am I moving the goalpost lol. It’s very binary. His product is in fact open source, and Jeff in fact has more distribution than his competitors across multi channels. If I he had no visibility, you wouldn’t throw a fit nor would that guy. You don’t see Sam Altman moaning about Anthropic “copying” their idea when in fact all of this tech/research predates their entrance in the market. Same shit here. Your solution is not novel.
English
1
0
0
30
lilchiva
lilchiva@lilchiva·
@bydylanlamb @jeffreyhuber You are just making shit up and moving goal posts because you fucked with the wrong hobbyist on twitter. Sir, this conversation was about "open source" search. And, 20b open sourced is not something a that a regular person can manage, also their harness is unpublished etc etc.
English
1
0
0
24
lilchiva
lilchiva@lilchiva·
@bydylanlamb @jeffreyhuber Except they work next-door, were given the information directly, discussed it with the other team, and oh yeah, my shit works right now and is actually free and reasonable for someone with a decent consumer machine to implement. So you are wrong and I am correct.
English
1
0
0
35
Dylan Lamb
Dylan Lamb@bydylanlamb·
@lilchiva @jeffreyhuber Saves me the trouble:
Josh@JoshPurtell

@maxrumpf @jeffreyhuber They can't be a copy cat because RL for search is, no offense to you or them, an obvious idea implemented by a ton of people. From academics working on deep research, to Cognition, to OpenAI with their deep research product. The main thing that matters is execution quality

English
1
0
0
46
lilchiva
lilchiva@lilchiva·
@bydylanlamb @jeffreyhuber Oh look, Dylan. It turns out that Jeff stole his homework from his neighbor. Meanwhile my shit is free and actually open source. Who is talking out their ass now? x.com/maxrumpf/statu…
Max Rumpf@maxrumpf

Chroma's "new" model sure seems familiar. A story. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. But there is a point where it goes from "inspiration" to whatever Context-1 is: 6 months ago, Chroma's CEO @jeffreyhuber asked us about our research. 4 months ago, we proudly shared SID-1's tech report with him. An exchange I now understand very differently (see the emails). Today, they released a report heavily "inspired" by ours. Charts, datasets, methods, and the whole model itself. Down to the toggle for Figure 1 and our 4x RRF rollouts. They never reached out to benchmark our model. Their claims of "pareto-optimality" ring hollow. They provable knew there was another model. Unfortunately, we can't benchmark their model: While their weights are open, the harness they say one needs isn't yet. Their claims of "pareto-optimality" ring hollow. They knew there was another model. I know Jeff well and our offices neighbor. We shared a lot of insights in our tech report. Maybe more than prudent. But we believe in advancing human knowledge. (Making search better is our way of doing so). We applaud companies like @thinkymachines that are brave enough to share the ideas that make the work possible. But where do we go as a research community when we stop respecting each other's work? When we don't give credit where it's due? And trick "friends" into sharing more, just to steal it? While claiming moral high ground by calling this "open-source?" This completely destroys any incentive for us (and others) to go into as much depth as we did in our tech report. It’s sad to see the poor research practices that are sadly common in academia making their way into startups. Context-1 has some interesting ideas: Pruning is clever. I wish I were writing about them. Followers and copycats, even if they're bigger, don't scare us. I'm very proud of what we've built. And even more proud of who I'm building this with. We're also hiring original thinkers.

English
1
0
1
91
clem 🤗
clem 🤗@ClementDelangue·
can someone share this with the Anthropic team?
clem 🤗 tweet media
English
48
11
240
26.9K
Ben Badejo
Ben Badejo@BenjaminBadejo·
@bydylanlamb Not if I can’t use it reliably. This isn’t about how good the model is. It’s about how reliable the service is and about avoiding being forced into API billing in the middle of a task / day / project (or having a running task choke upon an unpredictable rate-limit blocker).
English
1
0
0
173
Ben Badejo
Ben Badejo@BenjaminBadejo·
Do not use Claude Computer. When Anthropic rug-pulls you by ratcheting down its unquantified rate limits (like it did this week to thousands of users), you will lose all of your work when you sign into another subscription, or have to switch to API billing, which costs orders of magnitude more than the monthly subscription. Getting stuck in their product ecosystem means they can hold your data and workflows hostage and rob you blind — and you will have no choice in the matter. Plugging your business into this is insane unless you are fine with API billing from the start. If you aren’t, you’ll eventually get totally screwed one day. That’s their model. Think about it. Beware.
Ben Badejo tweet media
English
86
36
661
64.7K
Dylan Lamb retweetledi
Alex Hormozi
Alex Hormozi@AlexHormozi·
Friendly reminder that if your customers always complain about your prices - you don't need to lower your prices, you just need to raise your customers.
English
252
105
1.8K
44.2K
lilchiva
lilchiva@lilchiva·
@jeffreyhuber Ma'am, thank you for your interest in my meager tweet. I am pointing out that Firecrawl and Searxng exist. Meanwhile, the number of people who can functionally run a 20B at home is vanishingly small. What are you even trying to say here?
English
1
0
0
133
Sai Krishna ⚡️ Superblog.ai
Used Codex for a month. $20/mo Feels like it provides 80% of the value of Claude Code. $100/mo Gonna keep testing more.
English
33
2
281
19.8K
Dylan Lamb
Dylan Lamb@bydylanlamb·
@_weidai Codex glazers will be in for a funny month in May
English
0
0
0
60
Wei Dai
Wei Dai@_weidai·
The state of Claude vs. Codex, in two tweets.
Wei Dai tweet media
English
151
168
3K
199.6K
Moacir Braga
Moacir Braga@moa_brg·
@bydylanlamb @0xgib @MonchitoPelu @trq212 @amorriscode I am wondering if your project is too simple and you are asking small changes or if these issues affected randomly a group of users. A lot of people including me with Max 5x and 20x plans are facing it and a lot like you are not.
English
1
0
0
31
Thariq
Thariq@trq212·
To manage growing demand for Claude we're adjusting our 5 hour session limits for free/Pro/Max subs during peak hours. Your weekly limits remain unchanged. During weekdays between 5am–11am PT / 1pm–7pm GMT, you'll move through your 5-hour session limits faster than before.
English
2K
459
6.9K
6.3M