
Da9ny
6.8K posts

Da9ny
@c_ctex
Tesla owner in Houston, TX


I have invited you personally several times. Why didn’t you accept?


Demanding that Iran end its support for Hezbollah is effectively equivalent to demanding that it abandon one of the central pillars of its regional security strategy. A country willing to launch direct attacks on Israel in response to events in Beirut is demonstrating that its relationship with Hezbollah is not a disposable bargaining chip but a long-term strategic commitment. If President Trump makes these demands the centerpiece of negotiations, one of two things will happen: either he will be forced back into a conflict he does not want, or he will end up tolerating the very behavior he promised to stop as Iran continues supporting Hezbollah. The credibility of threats to resume military action is also questionable. Trump himself has acknowledged the limits of what military force can achieve. If the United States is unwilling to commit the resources necessary to reopen the Strait of Hormuz by force or physically remove Iran's enriched uranium stockpiles, then what exactly would be the objective of another war? The more Washington threatens action without following through, the more American deterrence risks eroding. That is particularly problematic given that Iran's perception of U.S. resolve appears to have weakened during the conflict itself. Meanwhile, diplomatic contacts continue in Switzerland, and Tehran has little incentive to make major concessions. If Trump's goal is ultimately a negotiated agreement, repeated military threats may not bring him closer to that objective. They could instead lock him into commitments that are either politically or strategically impossible to fulfill. The broader reality is that America's leverage over Iran was limited before the war and may be even more limited afterward. Any successful policy will have to start from that fact rather than from assumptions about what Washington can compel Tehran to do. #iran

Reports from Geneva: The Americans had planned a joint photo and handshake at the start of the meeting — senior members of the Iranian delegation refused.







No Ambassador @dannydanon, you don't know the first thing about UN law. As a matter of procedure, there is no rule that grants Member States an unrestricted right to personally attack UN officials, nor is there a rule prohibiting officials or the presiding officer from responding procedurally. International civil servants serve the Organization, not individual Member States. Article 100 specifically requires Member States to respect the exclusively international character of the responsibilities of the Secretary-General and Secretariat staff and not seek to influence them in the discharge of their functions. Personal attacks aimed at intimidating, or pressuring UN officials, breach that obligation.

Watch: During a UN discussion, an attempt was made by Special Representative @_VanessaFrazier to interrupt my remarks and shut down legitimate criticism. I refused to be silenced.








Mark, do you believe it’s appropriate for foreign governments to attempt to shape U.S. foreign policy and public opinion by working with right-wing media personalities, social media “influencers,” and bot networks?


Here’s top 10 countries lobbying our country. You ok with the first 9 since you didn’t mention any of them. Why is that? It's Saturday night. I'm spending time with my family. I'm not interested in dating you. Why don't you take a little time off? opensecrets.org/fara


The U.S. is going to regret acquiescing to Iranian demands to include Lebanon in this MoU. This linkage is one of the biggest mistakes.


🇺🇸🇮🇹 Trump adds fuel to the Meloni fire: You're no friend of mine Always known for his restraint and skilful diplomacy, Trump torched the Italian PM, claiming she begged him for a photo to boost her flagging popularity in Italy. She denies it. For context, her approval rating in Italy is 40-47%, Trump's in the U.S is 36-39% Source: Truth Social / Writer: Ian





