Moxey56

Trapped in the paradigm they made, its job to keep you permanently afraid, wrong think can't be displayed, re-align those who've strayed, it's easy to see for those awake the insidious fingers of corruption state, change before it's too late.

@AlisonMoyet She wasn't alone. There are millions like her but we don't feel the need to shout about it, we just live our lives. Vocal minorities are tearing society apart but they are just that..... minorities. As the fabric of society continues to to tear we will get louder.

I admit a small part of me holds a grudging respect for anyone unafraid of standing alone in a maelstrom of opposition, even when that person’s position is an utter anathema to me. So it is with Ann Widdecomb. She may’ve belonged to another world, but in it she was fascinating.

@clarkaw Which one produces the next generation?

@PeterTatchell Yet the reflex to spout vile words remains. You've shown who you are on several occasions. An apologist for men who rape 9 year olds. I'm amazed you still have a public profile.

I apologise for my insensitive comments about Ann Widdecombe's death Nobody deserves to die, no matter what they believe in My sincere condolences to Ann's family & friends I support the police investigation & want justice for Ann bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…

@rhysss_ If you want to live in a civilised society do better. Imagine someone saying this about one of your family members after they'd been murdered.

Rest in hell

@ianrich15813274 You don't base policy off someone "walking through" an area. Walk through Batley, Dewsbury, Bradford, et al and tell me what you see. The welfare budget has exploded and the governments own figures point to where it's going.

I've just walked through one of the most deprived areas in England. Sadly, lots of disabled & ill looking people, to be honest many with obesity issues. What also strikes me is how white this huge area of social housing is; I saw no brown, black or yellow faces. I checked, it's 97% white British. Many may disagree or get angry with this, but the social, health & economic problems here in a largely forgotten corner of North Eastern England have next to nothing to do with migrants. Before I get abused as being middle class & out of touch, I was raised on a council estate in a deprived town 100 miles away, but in the 1960s and 1970s we had a much stronger welfare state, before Thatcher wrecked it. We had more hope, equality & optimism than I saw today & far less of a problem with drugs. Any politician who tells you our core problems are due to migrants is either plain wrong or lying, maybe both. We created this society, it's up to us to make it stronger & fairer & to stop scapegoating people who come here to seek better lives & most of whom are willing to work hard to do so.

@Jvnior Choice.

This is the question of the year. Repost it.

@BasilTheGreat We live in an idiocracy.

🚨NEWS: Conservative MP David Rees has claimed that the reason the UK is experiencing mass migration from Asia and Africa is due to climate change

@PolitlcsUK There's no potential about it.

@implausibleblog @MarchForRejoin Brexit is not the reason for the decline in living standards over the last 40 years. This didn't start in 2016. It has been an ongoing decline for over 40 years. To blame it on Brexit is to be ignorant of basic economics.

20 year old student Edith Berryman at the #RejoinEU rally in parliament square calling for the UK to rejoin the European Union @MarchForRejoin "10 years since the Brexit referendum. I am 20 years old. I have grown up living with the consequences of that decision. I have a simple question. Did Brexit deliver what we were promised? My argument is simple." "Brexit has had a real measurable economic cost. Not just in political arguments, but in productivity, investment and living standards, not just one opinion or one forecast." "This is the conclusion we keep seeing across UK institutions and independent research. The question is not what people believed in 2016. The question is what can we learn from the evidence shown in 2026?" "And the evidence is clear. Firstly, in productivity, this again doesn't come from one political campaign or one think tank. This comes from the UK government, government's own Office for Budget Responsibility. Their estimate is that Brexit reduces long term, UK productivity by around 4% compared to staying in the EU." "And more recent academic work shows that figure even higher to around 6 to 8%. To put it simply, a smaller economy than we otherwise would have had. Secondly, investment. Because countries don't just grow by accident, they grow because business." "This creates, invests and builds for the future. Business investment in the UK fell sharply after the referendum and has remained weaker than expected ever since. Independent studies estimate it is around 10 to 15% lower than it would have been without Brexit." "And that matters because investment means jobs, it means wages, it means opportunities for the next generation, the younger generation, my generation, alph." "They estimate this loss in productivity translates into around 470 pounds per worker per year in lower wages over time, not just for today, but for years ahead. Thirdly, living standards." "Because this is where the debate stops being about statistics and it becomes real people's everyday lives. Research from institutions like the London School of Economics has found that Brexit related trade barriers increased costs in everyday goods, including food, contributing to higher household bills." "And some estimates suggest it could amount to around 250 pounds a year for the average household. And the Resolution foundation has found over, the long term, real wages are lower than they otherwise would have been expected to be. So when you put all three together, products, investment, living standards, you do not get one political slogan, you do not get one isolated focus." "You get a consistent picture from official institutions and independent research. And the question then becomes, how did we get here from what we were promised? Because this isn't just about numbers on a spreadsheet." "Behind every percentage point is a real life. It's about whether young people can afford a home, whether your business can grow, whether families feel like their wages are, going further. I think the biggest issue here is Trust." "In 2016, people were asked to make one of the biggest decisions in modern British history. They were promised that leaving would mean more control, more money and a stronger future. People were told, on the side of a bus, that leaving the EU would free up 350 million pounds a week for the NHS." "But now, 10 years on, we have to be honest about the gap between what was promised and what actually happened. Because democracy, it doesn't depend on everyone getting every decision right. Democracy depends on us being willing to look at the evidence afterwards and ask, did this work?" "What can we learn and what should we do next? Ten years ago, Britain chose a new direction. Today, we have the chance to choose what comes next. Not based on nostalgia, not based on slogans, not based on fear." "Based on reality. And, the future isn't built on ignoring the evidence, is built by facing it. So the question for 2026 is, now that we know the cost, what should we do next? Thank you very much."

@HelenWebberley You're a monster. Advocating for pumping kids with drugs and mutilating their bodies is child abuse. She's right you do belong in prison. How on earth do the medical authorities allow you to hold a licence!?

"They're autistic." "They're gay." "They've been abused." These are the same tired assumptions used to explain away trans people's identities. Trans children are not a problem to be fixed. They deserve to be listened to, supported, and allowed to live as themselves. Artwork featured: @your_pal_bucky Campaign: @LushLtd @TalkTV @JuliaHB1

@Alexarmstrong Not how I understand it. This applies to decisions made from now on and not to decisions already made. The one on Migrant Street is going ahead I believe.

Migrant Street has been STOPPED. This is a massive win, however, we should’ve never been in this position in the first place. It should not be down to journalists and the national press to force government to change policies.

@DamianLow3 Free movement and mass immigration broke Britain. Brexit was a vote to stop it yet it keeps happening.

They keep saying broken Britain without mentioning the elephant in the room that broke Britain. Brexit. Why would that be?

@curioushaggis @DearRebelAda This is the level of logic the left can muster...zero.

@DearRebelAda Would JHB be fine with cosmetic breast enhancement surgery? I’m pretty sure she would be. Therefore she is a hypocrite.

We are all Julia Hartley-Brewer: HW: “People like you shouldn’t get too involved in medicine, because of the harm you cause”. JHB: “People like you, and I mean this very respectfully, should be in prison. Genuinely”.

@DearRebelAda Who is that insane harriden?

@KimJohnsonMP Are you sniffing glue?

This is a tax on refugees. It's performative cruelty. We shouldn't be punishing people for fleeing war and persecution. The relentless demonisation of refugees must stop. theguardian.com/uk-news/2026/j…

@ShabanaMahmood I think this rises to the level of treason.

My goal is simple: to ensure we have an asylum system not just today, but for generations to come.

@ukhomeoffice @ShabanaMahmood The Home Office is captured and not fit for purpose. The strain on society caused by mass immigration will only get worse until net migration is reversed. Until you realise this everything you say is window dressing.

Home Secretary @ShabanaMahmood will be granted the power to determine how much refugees must pay back for their housing and financial support. The amount can be adjusted to ensure fairness to taxpayers and that migrants aren't forced into destitution.

Look closely at how Shabana Mahmood has chosen to frame this. Children playing in a refugee camp. A caption that reads "Britain will always offer sanctuary to those fleeing war and persecution." It is a calculated piece of design, and a deliberate misrepresentation of the policy sitting beneath it. The Community Sponsorship Scheme is modelled on Canada's programme. Under that model, and confirmed by how Britain's own Homes for Ukraine scheme actually operated, sponsors are permitted to nominate specific individuals. Existing communities in Britain will be able to bring over relatives and connections rather than the scheme allocating places to the most vulnerable refugees on earth. The nationalities prioritised are Sudanese and Eritrean nationals, chosen explicitly, in the Home Office's own words, because they represent the largest groups currently crossing the Channel illegally. This is not a scheme for unaccompanied children in camps. It is a nomination-based route for adults from two specific countries, selected because they are already arriving by other means. Look closer still. The children are dressed in styles associated with the Syrian refugee crisis, a conflict that drove millions from their homes between 2011 and the fall of Assad in December 2024. That image, however authentic its origin, belongs to a different country and a different chapter than the policy it now illustrates. The emotional weight of one of the defining humanitarian crises of the last fifteen years is being borrowed to sell a 2026 scheme that prioritises Sudan and Eritrea. "Britain will always offer sanctuary." Britain has signed accommodation contracts running until 2039. It opened twelve new asylum centres this week without informing the MPs whose constituents will live next to them. It has a four percent removal rate for those who arrive illegally. It has no biometric registry for Sudan or Eritrea, meaning a British family sponsoring a refugee cannot verify identity, criminal history or conflict zone involvement. In January 2026, fighting engulfed northeast Syria's detention network, which held around 9,000 male ISIS suspects from an estimated 60 countries across al-Hol and other facilities. Up to 200 detainees escaped Shaddadi prison. Syria separately confirmed a mass escape from al-Hol itself, involving relatives of ISIS fighters. Their whereabouts remain unknown. None of that appears anywhere near this image. "Capped." The cap is more than 10,000 by 2030, on top of the boats, on top of the asylum claims already running at a 2001 high, on top of the accommodation contracts already signed. Canada's equivalent scheme has resettled more than 390,000 people since 1979, including 30,000 in a single year. A cap that expands is not a cap. It is a starting figure. The accountability structure deserves the closest scrutiny of all. When a community sponsors a refugee, responsibility for support transfers to the sponsor for the first year. When something goes wrong, the government is insulated. The sponsor bears the consequence. Rhiannon Skye Whyte was stabbed twenty-three times by Deng Chol Majek, a Sudanese man who had entered Britain illegally by small boat three months earlier, in a hotel the government had repurposed as asylum accommodation. The sponsorship scheme does not remove that risk. It redistributes the liability for it, onto private citizens who will have no government resources behind them when something goes wrong. This image was not designed to inform the public. It was designed to make a specific demographic and accountability policy emotionally unchallengeable by attaching it to the most sympathetic image available, a child playing in a refugee camp that has nothing to do with the countries the policy targets. The public is being deceived, deliberately and by design.

@NHSMillion @DennyTWright Go into any A&E up and down the country and tell me what you see.

@NHSMillion @DennyTWright The 90s was a large increase in immigration with little increase in NHS budget. The Labour years (also high immigration) were due to a doubling of the NHS budget. (Which the country can't afford) The Tory years were covid and an explosion of immigration. See the common thread?

Whatever you do today, please don’t forget who caused NHS waiting lists to increase massively. The Conservatives have a long history of making people wait longer for the care they need. And it will take a long time to correct the messes they made.