High_RyZe

@DrTonyChopper_ @rah_66_comanche Whether you like it or not, investors still have some faith in him. You're also judging him based on the last 5 years. He used to spend a lot more time at the factories, labs, test sites, etc. and put all his money on the line multiple times. That's low time preference.

@calvin4292 @rah_66_comanche brother he does ketamine and tweets all day.

I am filled with optimism at the fact that the world's first trillionaire was made not by hedge funds or market manipulation, but by building the infrastructure to take America to the stars.

@DrTonyChopper_ @rah_66_comanche Can you read? There's no direct CEO gene you clown. I explicitly stated that. The various traits that make a good CEO (risk tolerance, time preference, etc.) are at least 20% genetic though. The fact you can't understand those words is a sign of room temp iq.

@calvin4292 @rah_66_comanche what research are you doing thats leading you to believe that there is a CEO gene? please direct me there.

@DrTonyChopper_ @rah_66_comanche mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/77620/ This isn't even taking into account risk tolerance which is important. Dome studies show that that's as high as 50% genetic.

@calvin4292 @rah_66_comanche Me when I just make shit up.

@DrTonyChopper_ @rah_66_comanche Not directly lmao. Genetics do account for at least 20% of time preference and related behavioral traits that make one more likely to be successful in positions like a CEO.

@calvin4292 @rah_66_comanche "genetic predisposition" they found the gene that makes someone a CEO?

@GuitaristTomo @creation247 Too little too late. China was lucky they got Deng before things went the Soviet way.

@calvin4292 @creation247 They introduced a mixed economy by the end of the union.

The European mind cannot comprehend:

@GuitaristTomo @creation247 Lmao. "Free" soviet healthcare. There's a reason why their economy collapsed.

@creation247 The Soviet Union had free healthcare and still sent people to space before the USA did

@DissentFu @floyd_the_sane Your language is so crass for a 52 year old. Very juvenile. It's likely why you're so miserable and candy be financially successful.

@floyd_the_sane Wow you lick pennies off the sludge bottom of a billionaires boots and still think you are better than slime 🤡

I am 52 years old. I have been working since I was 15 years old. I have no savings, no retirement, and will never own a home before I die. And there is now a trillionaire.

@DissentFu @ChifoiCristian You sound like the most miserable person out there. I doubt you're a decent human being yourself. Considering your situation at 52, you're obviously incompetent and want to take your rage and envy out on the world.

@ChifoiCristian Have you tried washing your ass and being a decent human being?

@throwmeawa37136 @RyanSaavedra What's your iq then? I'm guessing around room temp.

@RyanSaavedra In fact if you’re the kind of person who is so simple minded they would make a tweet like this strawmanning anything anyone has to say about an unprofitable failure of a company (outside satellite internet) being worth more than any other company then you failed the IQ test

Elon Musk becoming a trillionaire is an IQ test. If you are incredibly jealous, believe he should be destroyed, and think it is bad for humanity, you do not understand economics. Do not fail this test. If you do not understand, go learn about economics before posting your negative feelings and revealing to the world that you are a moron.

@theshadowithout @Devon_Eriksen_ Would be cool but it's way too hard and unpredictable. Sometimes 2 average people can produce an insane genius (this is how a lot of geniuses are born). We also don't have a good enough understanding of the human genome to do this effectively. One day we'll get there though.

@Devon_Eriksen_ The best solution is simple yet never addressed. Make Humanity Smarter. Like actually smarter. Improve their working memory and long term memory consolidation such that they can model these technologies effectively in their mind and make better decisions with those models.

The problem with universal suffrage is that the more technologically advanced a civilization becomes, the smaller the fraction of people there are in it with the native intelligence to understand how it works. When the majority of humanity was employed in whacking at the dirt with a pointed stick, and the height of technology was a slightly better pointed stick, anyone with a triple digit IQ could understand what was going on. Now, we have things like stock markets, the internet, transportation infrastructure, and the Linux kernel, but most people who vote are unable to conceive of these as anything but large piles of chocolate coins, or something else they can put their mouths. Because that's how the average monkey interacts with money. They stack the blocks, the research assistant gives them a token, they exchange the token for a banana. It's no good trying to explain to the monkeys what supply chain is, or how a trillion dollars worth of rockets can't magically be converted into a trillion dollars worth of bananas just because they're both measured in dollars, as if a six-foot man and a six-foot plank of wood were interchangeable. Finding a slightly different explanation, or getting the monkeys to sit still and really listen, doesn't really help. Because the problem isn't just that the monkeys aren't paying attention. The problem is that the monkeys are monkeys. Their brains simply don't have the developmental capacity to grow the neural connections they would need in order to grasp and manipulate the concept. In the long term, this is why universal democracy is doomed. Because societies that let retards vote will fail, and be replaced by those that don't. You may think that we, as a society, face a great variety of problems. We do not. We have only one. Retards. Every other problem we have is downstream from their inability to understand the consequences of their political opinions. But to fully grasp the implications of this, you have to understand that the definition of "retard" changes over time, as technology advances, because the IQ level required to grasp what's really going on gets steadily higher and higher. Eventually, the category "retard" grows until it includes the average person. This has already happened. Nick Knudsen isn't dumber than the average guy. But the average guy, the 100 IQ salt of the earth guy that's sitting on the next bar stool over, can no longer understand the modern economy. And this isn't correctable, because the problem isn't ignorance, it's complexity. You can't make Nick Knudsen smarter by telling him things. You can't even make him less ignorant, because the bare facts aren't believable to someone who doesn't have the framework to understand how they fit together. The people who understand what's going on are so much smarter than him that he doesn't even think they sound smart. He thinks they sound crazy.

@DrTonyChopper_ @rah_66_comanche No they're not. You need to have the courage and genetic predisposition to take on such risk. Not everyone has this low time preference. Clearly you don't and it shows. Very few people actually have the ability to go against millions of haters who thought starlink would fail.

@kevin4292 @rah_66_comanche all logistics anyone is capable of doing without all the racism, ketamine, and begging to get onto epstein island, ya bot.

@DrTonyChopper_ @rah_66_comanche Who do you think pulled together the team? Who pulled together the funding? Who took on all that risk and stayed up all night worrying about the future of his company? Who actually thought of the conceptual ideas that everyone thought was impossible just 7 years ago?

@kevin4292 @rah_66_comanche he doesnt do anything unique or have a unique skill set that contributes to SpaceX unless you count being racist, tweeting, and doing ketamine a skillset.

@DrTonyChopper_ @rah_66_comanche For Tesla sure. For SpaceX, he's been the most reliable of any company including NASA itself in terms of building stuff for space. Companies like Boeing cannot do as well. The barrier to entry is high for the industry so of course there aren't many players. Rockets are expensive

@kevin4292 @rah_66_comanche He has lied about what he is delivering multiple times over and over again lmao he cornered a market and ensured only he would get contracts. He is inefficient government waste.

@BurrowBeliever @velvetmilkman0 @zuim257 It's not about "hard work." It's about spearheading the development of and providing a good/service that people are willing to pay for at a large scale. That's what creates wealth.

@velvetmilkman0 @zuim257 No amount of hard work makes you $800 billion dollars in a year

Elon was worth 400 million like a year ago Please explain to me how he tripled his net worth by just working hard

@DrTonyChopper_ @rah_66_comanche From taxes. It's still not free money for the company though. That just isn't how it works. Musk will lose investor confidence if his company fails to deliver what he promised to his customers.

@kevin4292 @rah_66_comanche Where does the money from a contract come from?

@DrTonyChopper_ @rah_66_comanche Contracts are not subsidies. Both parties involved are exchanging something for a mutual benefit. By pension funds, I mean things like the Ontario Teacher one that saw a crazy return on the investment. Others who invested in SpaceX (Thiel) haven't really gotten subsidies.

@kevin4292 @rah_66_comanche are pension funds perhaps like peoples 401k's? how did the other billionaires get wealthy? subsidies? contracts? using their wealth to lobby the government? to get more subsidies? contracts?

@DrTonyChopper_ @rah_66_comanche That's not how this works. He was given tax breaks in hopes his companies would innovate faster. The money came from investors like pension funds, other billionaires, etc. You've looked at a couple surface level headlines and drew bizarre conclusions.

@kevin4292 @rah_66_comanche The literal first post in this thread mentions contracts. Woaw, they are purchasing something he built with wealth obtained through tax payer money and then selling it back to the tax payer. sounds like they paid twice. x.com/DrTonyChopper_…

@DrTonyChopper_ @rah_66_comanche It's ironic that you're just using an AI summary rather than actually looking at any of the finer details. But hey, whatever suits your slop narrative I guess.

@kevin4292 @rah_66_comanche