Sabitlenmiş Tweet
@benjimk The MASSIVE treasure in Africa is not of this world 🌍
I have seen jewels there that, in the Kingdom of God, make me look like a common river rock amongst the gems of Topkapi Palace.
English
Casey Kent
72K posts
@katyperry You're not trapped in a simulation silly.
We just have satanists running around.
I tell terry all the time.
@terrycrews
youtu.be/D4-oDsh1YAE
YouTube
English
may the 4th be with you, and free delivery, and double points...🤩
English
I’m going to say this again—please, just look around and read the room. What we need right now are clear, stated labels. What’s the story they’re trying to sell?
I don’t love having to say this so bluntly, but it’s the truth: what’s happening here—and the way it’s happening—isn’t working, and in a post-2024 world, it frankly feels offensive given what we’re all living through. There has to be a better way.
Words fucking matter. And so do labels—man alive, they matter more than ever in 2026.
No Labels@NoLabelsOrg
Different extremes, same grievances. The far left and right are merging, and they're organizing around what they hate, not what they want to build. Someone has to fight for the middle. That's what No Labels is here to do. Our Chief Strategist Ryan Clancy in @RCPolitics:
English
Casey Kent retweetledi
After murdering Hind, the IDF lied that it had no forces in the area where she was killed.
Both Hind and her 15-year old cousin Layan mentioned seeing a tank (Hind said it was "next to me") in their recorded phone calls to the Red Crescent asking for help, & Satellite imagery proves IDF tanks were METERS away from where Hind was killed.
History Speaks@History__Speaks
IDF policy in Gaza - 1) give evacuation orders, 2) sanction the murder of everyone who fails to evacuate - led to the murder of Hind Rajab. On the morning of 29 Jan 2024, IDF issued pic-related evacuation order. Hind and her family were murdered there the same day, while trying to evacuate.
English
@katyperry I know they tortured you sweetheart.
You have to wake up now okay.
I love you.
youtu.be/VNqyxbSa9PI
YouTube
English
Casey Kent retweetledi
Women’s Athlete of the Year belongs to our very own Hannah Stuelke 🏆🐤
English
@dawnstaley The twitter people only ever send that to me because they want to remind me I can be killed at any moment 🤣
They're very sick people.
English
Sending lots of light and love to everyone who took time of your day to wish me a happy birthday. I’m blessed because of all of you! Another trip around the sun which is never promised but always a blessing. Thankful! Grateful! Filled with love. God is the greatest!
English
English
The Supreme Court temporarily restored the ability to get the abortion drug mifepristone by mail - but what comes next? @eliehonig tells @jaketapper 'I expect the Supreme Court to give us a more substantive ruling really within the next handful of days.'
English
Prof. Jeffrey Sachs : Trump's Ship Is Sinking x.com/i/broadcasts/1…
English
@citrinowicz FUNDAMENTALLY THE ROTHSCHILD FAKE "ISRAEL" WANTS TO MUDER THEIR NEIGHBORS AND TAKE THEIR LAND, FUNDAMENTALLY.
@AnaKasparian
English
The fundamental problem here is your limited understanding regarding Iran’s nuclear strategy.
Let me briefly clarify for you several key points:
A. As long as the current regime remains in power, it is highly unlikely that Iran would agree to relinquish its right to uranium enrichment. This position is deeply entrenched.
B. Enrichment, for Iran, is not solely a technical question related to nuclear weapons capability. It is also tied to national identity and regime ideology. Expecting Iran to abandon it entirely would, in practice, imply a fundamental change in the nature of the regime.
C. Under the previous nuclear agreement, Iran did meet its commitments in a way that extended its breakout time to roughly one year. Given the inherent lack of trust, any future agreement would need to include a robust monitoring and verification regime that is both effective and perceived as credible from all sides.
D. On the issue of inspections, the
prior monitoring framework proved to be highly effective. Its absence today represents one of the most significant gaps compared to the earlier agreement.
E. Regarding “snapback” sanctions, expectations were always limited. The mechanism was viewed primarily as a preferable alternative to inaction, rather than a decisive tool for constraining Iran’s nuclear program.
F. An agreement that includes strict monitoring, limits Iran’s enrichment to 3.67%, and allows only a minimal stockpile, combined with a freeze of at least ten years given that existing material is sufficient for the Tehran Research Reactor, such an agreement keeps Iran meaningfully far from a nuclear weapon.
The reason is straightforward: without sufficient fissile material, Iran cannot produce a bomb, regardless of its technical capabilities.
G. By contrast, under current
conditions, there are no meaningful constraints on Iran’s program. It can advance toward higher enrichment levels much more rapidly, without effective oversight, leaving the international community almost entirely dependent on intelligence assessments rather than on-ground verification.
In practical terms, this is a far less stable and far more dangerous situation.
H. It is also important to recall that Iran’s nuclear program predates the current regime, originating during the Shah’s era. In the present context, any viable agreement will likely resemble the previous framework: constraints on nuclear activities in exchange for economic relief.
I. One of the core challenges these days is that many "experts" lack a deep familiarity with Iran’s nuclear doctrine and the history of efforts to address it. Instead of engaging with that complexity, it is often replaced by simplified narratives that suggest there are easy solutions. There aren’t.
As long as the current regime remains in power, it is important to be realistic about the limits of what can be achieved.
Certain expectations, particularly those that assume Iran will fundamentally abandon core elements of its nuclear program, are simply not grounded in how the regime operates or how it has behaved historically
The Iran issue is highly complex and requires a well-informed and nuanced understanding to address it effectively.
All the best.
#IranWar
Ellen R. Wald Ph.D.🛢@EnergzdEconomy
There’s a fundamental problem with this paradigm & that’s the idea that Iran’s nuclear ambitions can be thwarted through diplomatic mechanisms. Inspections/snapback sanctions didn’t work. Iran will manage to continue nuclear operations furtively.
English
@theAUSLofficial @PickensKarlyn @AUSL_Blaze IT WOULD BE THE WORST MISTAKE OF YOUR LIVES.
@marklevinshow
English
What “nuclear arsenal”? Come on, @nytimes this is a misleading headline to say the least.
Iran has no “nuclear arsenal.” According to U.S. intelligence, Iran wasn’t weaponizing and was at least 9-12 months away from getting a bomb.
English