most of it is straight women cope. it’s easier to call mеn who mistreat wоmen gay than come to terms with the fact that the men they like don’t value & respect them the same way
what’s up with people saying that black people have this victim complex…if you’re a race that’s constantly getting treated differently, of course there will be side eyeing and defensiveness. People aren’t stupid.
@CanadaDry42@DA_EL75@author_pandp don’t get moral amnesia on me bud you started the offensive stuff. i would’ve been willing to continue the conversation but i don’t take name calling lightly and will always dish out what i can take. argue with someone else 👋
@caterpilhar@DA_EL75@author_pandp Let’s call it how it is: You lost. You don’t have any actual points, your only evidence is biased think pieces from “Libtard: The Company”, you can’t dismantle any of my arguments and you resorted to calling me a chimp but get pissed the second I throw that back at you
@CanadaDry42@DA_EL75@author_pandp Ugh, i hate arguing with racist there’s never any understanding or rationality in it. Also if you actually took a chance to read the nyt and duke article there are numerical statistics, like a lot of them. have the day you deserve chimp
@caterpilhar@DA_EL75@author_pandp “some random libtard is more reliable than objective numbers” you’re black retardedness is showing
I don’t care about it cuz it’s a biased opinion piece compared to my evidence of facts
@CanadaDry42@DA_EL75@author_pandp You don’t care because yk it invalidates your argument. Just looking at numbers is an outstanding way to be consistently misinformed; you should always do your due diligence and look beyond the #s. Also, my sources are considerably more reliable than a random blog post lmao😭
@caterpilhar@DA_EL75@author_pandp ah yes because some random person’s opinion piece carries more weight that cold hard objective numbers
I could give a shit what some biased writer for the NYTimes has to say, they’re never going to have the credibility hard facts and numbers do