Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Cameron Fredman
1.8K posts

Cameron Fredman
@cfredman
Lawyer, political junkie, musician, dog-lover, and reluctant optimist. https://t.co/nKajSVH7eS https://t.co/U7kCPh8tb1
Los Angeles Katılım Aralık 2007
1K Takip Edilen254 Takipçiler


If Kamala wins I will give everyone in the replies a copy of Mario Party Jamboree
Pop Crave@PopCrave
Election Day is one week away.
English

@InternetH0F I suspect a code. "Cassie, here is your first pair of glasses." "Cassie, second pair for you. Attention." "Here is your third task, Cassandra.". The varied wording is suspicious.
English

@SJohnsdottire In a year the debt collectors will have no way to get at you, now that there are windows and doors blocking the openings.
English

@cfredman @PersistentOne3 @rickhasen @hugolowell I know. I'm replying to the deleted post where someone tried to pass off a Colorado statute as if it were in force in Pennsylvania.
English

@shotpianist @PersistentOne3 @rickhasen @hugolowell The USC in 52 USC 10307(c) stands for United States Code, i.e., federal law.
English

@lewbryson @BadLegalTakes Same. I thought, "is he quoting from the dissent or something?" before finding the third image.
English

@BadLegalTakes Didn't see that third panel immediately, and I'm like...where's the bad take?
And then...wow.
English
Cameron Fredman retweetledi

@n00buntu @adamscochran In other words, the analogous question would be "IF you beat your wife, should you go to jail?" A person who did not beat their wife could still answer "yes" without conceding the wife-beating.
English

@n00buntu @adamscochran No, it's really not. A "when did you stop beating your wife" question assumes a fact you dispute in the part of the question you're not being asked. By contrast, "IF it is proven..." does not.
English

There is one summary question here:
“If it is proven beyond a shadow of a doubt, or by his own admission, that Trump knowingly had his team try and forge documents and defraud Congress to try and overthrow the election, is he unfit for office, and should he face punishment?”
Most Trump supporters seem to be only able to reply with:
-But what about Biden’s crime.
-It’s a fake case.
-It’s political weaponization.
But they cannot bring themselves to admit that *if* he did it, he should face consequences.
That’s how you know they aren’t honest or rational actors. (Or are foreign influence accounts)
Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)@adamscochran
1/13 There is your October surprise. Judge unseals the filing of Jack Smith’s case against Donald Trump. It’s lengthy but even the first brush takeaways are damning.
English

"No harm in it, legally at least" written by a lawyer in reference to *checks notes* staging a coup. x.com/capitolhunters…
capitolhunters@capitolhunters
Skimming the Jack Smith filing, seems that Ken Chesebro (CC5 here, p. 53) was openly telling people his fake elector plan was a gambit to let Congressmen make false claims disputing the election. He seems to be clearly aware the votes were illegal. Not a good look. 1/
English

@OrinKerr Had a crim law prof who famously started every class by yelling out the door, "Last call for a good time!"
English

@PhilAndersUAE @JasonKPargin Maybe largest at the end, but if the model doesn't start the bump at the beginning it's assuming no effect during the convention, which seems a very odd assumption. The shape of a "bump" would still show the last night with a greater effect than the first.
English

@cfredman @JasonKPargin My view would be that the bump (if it really exists) is largest at the end of the convention, because you have the culmination of multiple nights intense media coverage, and the presidential candidate is the headliner for the final night.
English

@PhilAndersUAE @JasonKPargin I didn't specify whether I was measuring from the beginning or end of the convention. That said, shouldn't the bump measure from the beginning? I.e., wouldn't a campaign get a boost during their convention?
English

@cfredman @JasonKPargin The convention ended three weeks ago, not “a full month”. If the ‘08 bump track is still in his model today, it equates to a ~1.5% boost for Harris in polls being released right now.
English

@PhilAndersUAE @JasonKPargin That is not a plausible explanation a full month after the convention.
English

@JasonKPargin Nate used to have a really aggressive convention-bump adjustment in the old 538 models, and he has been open about it still being there in his new one. I think he will drift into line with other models as the bump falls out of his calculations.
English

@LuckyDogHotSaus @GeorgePapa19 The economy, abortion rights, immigration, conflict zones... there was simply no way to know these kinds of topics would come up in a presidential debate in advance.
English
















