chainvibes

597 posts

chainvibes banner
chainvibes

chainvibes

@chain_vibes

~ Validating Vibes ~

Katılım Temmuz 2019
155 Takip Edilen152 Takipçiler
chainvibes retweetledi
Chainlink
Chainlink@chainlink·
📂 CHAINLINK PLATFORM ┃ ┣ 📂 Orchestration ┃ ┗ 📂 Chainlink Runtime Environment (CRE) ┣ 📂 Data ┃ ┣ 📂 Data Streams ┃ ┣ 📂 Data Feeds ┃ ┣ 📂 DataLink ┃ ┣ 📂 SmartData ┃ ┣ 📂 Proof of Reserve ┃ ┣ 📂 NAV ┃ ┗ 📂 AUM ┃ ┗ 📂 Smart Value Recapture (SVR) ┣ 📂 Interop ┃ ┣ 📂 Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP) ┃ ┣ 📂 Cross-Chain Messaging ┃ ┣ 📂 Cross-Chain Tokens (CCTs) ┃ ┗ 📂 Programmable Token Transfers ┣ 📂 Compliance ┃ ┣ 📂 Automated Compliance Engine (ACE) ┃ ┗ 📂 Cross-Chain Identity (CCID) ┣ 📂 Privacy ┃ ┣ 📂 Chainlink Confidential Compute ┃ ┣ 📂 Blockchain Privacy Manager ┃ ┣ 📂 CCIP Private Transactions ┃ ┗ 📂 DECO ┣ 📂 Capital Markets ┃ ┣ 📂 Digital Transfer Agent (DTA) Technical Standard ┃ ┣ 📂 Delivery vs. Payment ┃ ┗ 📂 Payment vs. Payment ┣ 📂 Compute ┃ ┣ 📂 Automation ┃ ┣ 📂 Functions ┃ ┗ 📂 VRF ┗ 📂 Economics ┣ 📂 Payments ┣ 📂 Staking ┣ 📂 Payment Abstraction ┗ 📂 Reserve ┣ 📂 Scale ┗ 📂 Build ┗ 📂 Rewards
English
51
227
1.3K
50.7K
chainvibes retweetledi
CoinGecko
CoinGecko@coingecko·
$FET and $AKT are among the most searched coins in the past 3 hours alongside Bitcoin.
CoinGecko tweet media
English
140
138
786
65.8K
chainvibes retweetledi
Akash Network
Akash Network@akashnet·
Burn-Mint Equilibrium is officially live as the core team completed the Mainnet 17 upgrade just moments ago. Every workload on Akash now directly ties to the utility of $AKT. Here's what's happening on-chain right now: → $AKT price data and oracle are live → The price oracle is healthy and BME is active → All deployment are fully functional
Akash Network tweet media
English
43
105
373
31.4K
chainvibes retweetledi
Sentinel
Sentinel@SentinelP2P·
What if anyone could easily create their own decentralized VPN application with just a blockchain RPC and 0 external servers? Sentinel makes this possible with its architecture. Communities, organizations, individuals can soon all create their own application within minutes.
English
5
23
85
2.6K
chainvibes retweetledi
Anndy Lian
Anndy Lian@anndylian·
Try to name a Layer 1 that's down 99% from its high, with a missing founder, but still has a super active community. 🤔 Hard, right? I've got one in mind.
English
391
115
751
65K
Satoshi Flipper
Satoshi Flipper@SatoshiFlipper·
If we get The Clarity Act passed and the US-Iran conflict sorted over the next 45-60 days, our bags will FULL SEND, right as the new Federal Reserve Chairman readies to nuke rates to 1% ... CT has the ability to go from EXTREME FEAR to EXTREME GREED in microseconds 😌
English
85
76
1K
56K
vitalik.eth
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin·
There have recently been some discussions on the ongoing role of L2s in the Ethereum ecosystem, especially in the face of two facts: * L2s' progress to stage 2 (and, secondarily, on interop) has been far slower and more difficult than originally expected * L1 itself is scaling, fees are very low, and gaslimits are projected to increase greatly in 2026 Both of these facts, for their own separate reasons, mean that the original vision of L2s and their role in Ethereum no longer makes sense, and we need a new path. First, let us recap the original vision. Ethereum needs to scale. The definition of "Ethereum scaling" is the existence of large quantities of block space that is backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum - that is, block space where, if you do things (including with ETH) inside that block space, your activities are guaranteed to be valid, uncensored, unreverted, untouched, as long as Ethereum itself functions. If you create a 10000 TPS EVM where its connection to L1 is mediated by a multisig bridge, then you are not scaling Ethereum. This vision no longer makes sense. L1 does not need L2s to be "branded shards", because L1 is itself scaling. And L2s are not able or willing to satisfy the properties that a true "branded shard" would require. I've even seen at least one explicitly saying that they may never want to go beyond stage 1, not just for technical reasons around ZK-EVM safety, but also because their customers' regulatory needs require them to have ultimate control. This may be doing the right thing for your customers. But it should be obvious that if you are doing this, then you are not "scaling Ethereum" in the sense meant by the rollup-centric roadmap. But that's fine! it's fine because Ethereum itself is now scaling directly on L1, with large planned increases to its gas limit this year and the years ahead. We should stop thinking about L2s as literally being "branded shards" of Ethereum, with the social status and responsibilities that this entails. Instead, we can think of L2s as being a full spectrum, which includes both chains backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum with various unique properties (eg. not just EVM), as well as a whole array of options at different levels of connection to Ethereum, that each person (or bot) is free to care about or not care about depending on their needs. What would I do today if I were an L2? * Identify a value add other than "scaling". Examples: (i) non-EVM specialized features/VMs around privacy, (ii) efficiency specialized around a particular application, (iii) truly extreme levels of scaling that even a greatly expanded L1 will not do, (iv) a totally different design for non-financial applications, eg. social, identity, AI, (v) ultra-low-latency and other sequencing properties, (vi) maybe built-in oracles or decentralized dispute resolution or other "non-computationally-verifiable" features * Be stage 1 at the minimum (otherwise you really are just a separate L1 with a bridge, and you should just call yourself that) if you're doing things with ETH or other ethereum-issued assets * Support maximum interoperability with Ethereum, though this will differ for each one (eg. what if you're not EVM, or even not financial?) From Ethereum's side, over the past few months I've become more convinced of the value of the native rollup precompile, particuarly once we have enshrined ZK-EVM proofs that we need anyway to scale L1. This is a precompile that verifies a ZK-EVM proof, and it's "part of Ethereum", so (i) it auto-upgrades along with Ethereum, and (ii) if the precompile has a bug, Ethereum will hard-fork to fix the bug. The native rollup precompile would make full, security-council-free, EVM verification accessible. We should spend much more time working out how to design it in such a way that if your L2 is "EVM plus other stuff", then the native rollup precompile would verify the EVM, and you only have to bring your own prover for the "other stuff" (eg. Stylus). This might involve a canonical way of exposing a lookup table between contract call inputs and outputs, and letting you provide your own values to the lookup table (that you would prove separately). This would make it easy to have safe, strong, trustless interoperability with Ethereum. It also enables synchronous composability (see: ethresear.ch/t/combining-pr… and ethresear.ch/t/synchronous-… ). And from there, it's each L2's choice exactly what they want to build. Don't just "extend L1", figure out something new to add. This of course means that some will add things that are trust-dependent, or backdoored, or otherwise insecure; this is unavoidable in a permissionless ecosystem where developers have freedom. Our job should make to make it clear to users what guarantees they have, and to build up the strongest Ethereum that we can.
English
2.6K
1.6K
9.9K
6.3M
BSCN
BSCN@BSCNews·
📈UPDATE: BLACKROCK TRANSFERS $672M IN CRYPTO TO COINBASE @BlackRock moved 6,918 $BTC ($538.6M) and 58,327 $ETH ($133.6M) to Coinbase approximately one hour ago, totaling $672M in digital assets. Time to panic or remain calm?
English
67
72
505
144.2K
chainvibes retweetledi
Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※)
25.7 MILLION POL burned in January i.e. 0.24% of POL's total supply that's now gone. If this continues, by the end of 2026, ~3% of POL will be burnt by the protocol. POLs value accrual is so clearly defined - More usage on POS chain, more POL tokens get burnt. Simple.
Sandeep | CEO, Polygon Foundation (※,※) tweet media
English
75
81
535
25.3K
chainvibes retweetledi
Sentinel
Sentinel@SentinelP2P·
The Sentinel dVPN SDK is now open source. After onboarding 50+ developers through an invite-only process via @norselabs, the dVPN SDK API is now open to everyone. Developers can register their own dVPN apps, build directly on the protocol layer, and explore new use cases for decentralized bandwidth and privacy. “This has been requested by the community for a long time. We’ve now reached a point where developers can unlock the Sentinel network for dVPN and start building in a meaningful way.” - @alexlitreev CEO The first 100 devices per app are covered at no cost.
Sentinel tweet media
English
4
12
54
2.2K
ICO Analytics #StandWithUkraine 🇺🇦
A look back at the digital assets launched in January 2026, sorted by fully diluted valuation. $sent $gwei $fogo $birb $skr $acu $brev $inx $roll $elsa
ICO Analytics #StandWithUkraine 🇺🇦 tweet media
English
4
3
54
6.8K
Coin Bureau
Coin Bureau@coinbureau·
🔥 VITALIK WARNS OF A CRYPTO “DOOMSDAY” SCENARIO Vitalik Buterin says his greatest fear is if crypto becomes "just speculation with no real applications." He warns that if people only gamble, “this industry will die." To avoid that, he says we must build real value — true DAOs, dApps with real use, & more open DeFi.
Coin Bureau tweet media
English
820
471
3.6K
408.1K
Chainlink
Chainlink@chainlink·
In TradFi, privacy is a non-negotiable. Chainlink Confidential Compute is bringing that same expectation to onchain finance, removing one of the biggest barriers to institutional adoption.
English
19
91
661
26.1K
chainvibes
chainvibes@chain_vibes·
@NikoDMT @cosmoslabs_io Sei, Polygon, and $KEX 🦄all use the same underlying technology. Many, like OP Stack, rely on centralized sequencers. ⚠️ Cosmos remains one of the most decentralized and technically stable chains. 🚀 ATOM's ⚛️ deserves more respect. Real use cases #DePIN $AKT @SentinelP2P
English
0
0
3
99
chainvibes retweetledi
Sentinel
Sentinel@SentinelP2P·
If UK authorities debate banning @X over @grok image generation, shouldn't all AI be judged by the same rules to avoid bias?
English
24
44
97
294.8K