🔗

796 posts

🔗 banner
🔗

🔗

@chainlinktheory

hexagon enjoyer / conspiracy analyst

Katılım Ağustos 2022
5 Takip Edilen20 Takipçiler
🔗
🔗@chainlinktheory·
@KulakMAGAMan @Al_B_Lawson @MrLeadslinger Not sure why you wrote an entire novel defending Epstein but I was only using that as an example of something previously called a "conspiracy theory". Feel free to tell the survivors and first responders that they're wrong about the controlled demolitions
English
0
0
0
27
Dude 🏅
Dude 🏅@Mattcryptoact·
I do not know what is it with you people. What caused the building to collapse was a structural failure at one or 2 levels of the building where the place hit. All it needed was the center metal beams to heat up enough to bend just slightly since it had more floors above it and tons of weight already on it. I do not understand how you all have such strong imaginations but never use them on where it counts.
English
1
0
8
244
Daniel Prinsloo
Daniel Prinsloo@Daniel7Prinsloo·
It's 2026 and people really belive a plane took down the towers. Wild
Daniel Prinsloo tweet media
English
2.4K
11.1K
59.2K
5.8M
JeffersonianToTheMax-LiberateFromStudents68
@Al_B_Lawson @MrLeadslinger If you had any idea how controlled demos are set up, or how many 1000s of people were in the building (mere 100s in the wee hours) you'd know how hard it would be. I'm sure none of the dozens of guys wiring up the building to blow all never said a word in all this time.
English
1
0
10
266
Dude 🏅
Dude 🏅@Mattcryptoact·
@Daniel7Prinsloo Its not the planes themselves that destroyed the twin towers, its the heat of the jet fuel burning. Please stop posting such nonsense man. You look like a total idiot online, and your kids will see all this later.
English
50
3
327
58.1K
Bill G
Bill G@Bill_Gro·
@Daniel7Prinsloo Hey, moron! It was the burning jet fuel, you fucking idiot.
English
9
0
19
6.7K
🔗
🔗@chainlinktheory·
@alexboge I see you have no comment on how that tiny amount of jet fuel turned the biggest buildings in the world to dust. Thanks for playing
English
0
0
0
17
Alex Boge
Alex Boge@alexboge·
@chainlinktheory Sure did. Your personal incredulity and lack of knowledge of the topic are irrelevant. Whatcha gonna repeat from the revisionist script next? DEWs? No planes? Seek lots of help.
English
1
0
3
33
Alex Boge
Alex Boge@alexboge·
Plane incident → conspiracy addicts immediately spam 9/11 comparisons. You can set your watch by it. 😠 Not because it makes sense - because they can’t stop themselves. This is what conspiracy addiction does - it overrides judgment and turns every event into the same recycled narrative. That’s what zombie conspiracies look like: Same script. Same claims. Same debunked nonsense - recycled for a new audience. Brought up endlessly. And the comparison? Laughable. A small jet already on landing rollout at <70 mph vs. a ~5× heavier jet hitting a building at ~500+ mph are not even in the same universe of energy. Kinetic energy: KE = ½mv² • Runway jet (CRJ-900) ~85,000 lb at ~70 mph → KE ≈ 41,000,000 joules • 9/11 jet (Boeing 767) ~400,000 lb at ~500 mph → KE ≈ 4,500,000,000 joules That’s over 100× more energy - 41 million vs. 4.5 billion, with a “b”. Not even close. The CRJ-900 remained mostly intact. And the part they always ignore: impact didn’t bring those buildings down. Unchecked fires are what caused all three WTC buildings to collapse - weakening the structure until failure. This is what conspiracy addiction looks like in practice - compulsive, repetitive, and completely disconnected from reality. You’re not exposing anything; You’re just repeating a script. And it’s annoying, and even offensive. Seek help, you’re embarrassing yourselves.
Alex Boge tweet mediaAlex Boge tweet mediaAlex Boge tweet media
English
27
15
85
10.3K
Michael Shellenberger
Michael Shellenberger@shellenberger·
Joe Kent says he is skeptical that Tyler Robinson, who confessed to killing Charlie Kirk, was the lone shooter. That accusation could undermine the prosecutors’ case against Robinson. Kent says he knew of the risk before he decided to speak out.
Michael Shellenberger tweet media
English
1.4K
578
3.2K
1.1M
Blake Neff
Blake Neff@BlakeSNeff·
Tyler Robinson literally confessed to his parents, and was turned in by them, and has his DNA all over the weapon used to kill Charlie. But some people are so obsessed with hating Israel, the same thing they are obsessed with literally every day, that they will try to help a murderer get off so they can keep pursuing their daily obsession. substack.com/home/post/p-19…
English
4.3K
1.6K
8.9K
1.6M
ColonelTowner-Watkins
ColonelTowner-Watkins@ColonelTowner·
This is damage to an aircraft was done by a fire truck but an airplane destroyed an entire building made of reinforced steel? And bldg 7 down the street? 😬 They truly think we’re stupid and too afraid to ask questions and demand answers.
Secretary Sean Duffy@SecDuffy

I am on my way to LaGuardia Airport now in response to last night’s horrific crash involving Air Canada Express 8646 and a fire truck that killed two pilots. @FAANews and @NTSB are working closely on this, and we will share updates as soon as possible. Please keep the victims, families and response teams in your prayers.

English
118
433
1.2K
29.6K
Wave Dinfield
Wave Dinfield@harbs16·
@PoliticalStacy @ThoughtCrimes80 Nobody put bombs in the building. The would have gone off on impact. But they waited an hour…why? And they waited 8 hours for building 7 to set them off? Lol makes no sense.
English
1
0
0
37
Stacy is Right
Stacy is Right@PoliticalStacy·
This is what happens with a plane hits a firetruck, but when a plane hits the largest buildings in NYC, the buildings collapse into dust. Weird.
Stacy is Right tweet media
English
317
370
1.6K
32.6K
🔗
🔗@chainlinktheory·
@compressmyneck @Globe_not_flat @RealAbs1776 The planes stayed intact after hitting the towers? You might be the first person to ever make that claim. Also, the majority of the towers weren't hit by anything which means they could not collapse on top of themselves to the ground
English
1
0
0
21
High on FOMO
High on FOMO@compressmyneck·
You just countered your own argument. Mass with high speed will do more damage to mass with no speed. You inverted the objects, but the outcome was the same. Now switch the buildings and planes again, and just like magic, you are at the correct conclusion. The planes would stay intact while the building would fail.
English
1
0
0
26
🔗
🔗@chainlinktheory·
@compressmyneck @Globe_not_flat @RealAbs1776 The clips are fully in context as they were describing what just happened to them. But since you've already seen those interviews you must be aware that some of the explosions happened before the planes hit
English
1
0
0
19
High on FOMO
High on FOMO@compressmyneck·
@chainlinktheory @Globe_not_flat @RealAbs1776 I've seen it before, hundreds of clips taken out of context to serve a conspiracy theory. When watching the full interviews with a fireman first on scene, he is told the explosions were most likely from jet fuel, and he then agrees.
English
1
0
0
23