Charles Aomo

11.7K posts

Charles Aomo banner
Charles Aomo

Charles Aomo

@charlesaomo

Nairobi, Kenya Katılım Mayıs 2017
398 Takip Edilen292 Takipçiler
Charles Aomo retweetledi
vieren
vieren@richvieren·
@HumansNoContext unseen levels of confidence to belly fat ratio.
English
3
1
137
13.7K
Charles Aomo retweetledi
MSIZI 🇿🇦
MSIZI 🇿🇦@msiziworld·
This is the best gender reveal I've ever seen 😭😂😂😂😂🔥🔥🔥👌🏼
English
4.7K
9K
209.1K
8.4M
Felix Strong
Felix Strong@FelixWakavata·
@Whiledvid Pilot had already landed safely on the shore, why take to the skies again in a compromised chopper?
English
1
0
1
1.2K
Wild😶‍🌫️
Wild😶‍🌫️@Whiledvid·
5 months ago, a Ka-226 helicopter crashed in russia with employees of the military plant "Kizlyar Electromechanical Plant" The accident killed the deputy general director, chief engineer and chief designer
English
779
398
9.6K
8M
Charles Aomo
Charles Aomo@charlesaomo·
@razgriiz @Whiledvid Maybe 1 or all of them didn't know how to swim & therefore were looking for a hard surface.😆
English
1
0
0
4.1K
Razgriz
Razgriz@razgriiz·
@Whiledvid they where on the ground at least 3 times but refused to just let it go
English
16
9
3.8K
223.5K
Charles Aomo
Charles Aomo@charlesaomo·
@edwinsifuna Sifuna had eyes on Warsame, Kenyans had eyes on KK, Sifuna is Sharp boy, my leader.
English
0
3
47
7.3K
Charles Aomo retweetledi
Edwin Sifuna
Edwin Sifuna@edwinsifuna·
At the end of these interviews we really must interrogate Warsame's fitness to be judge.
English
116
1.7K
6.6K
0
Charles Aomo
Charles Aomo@charlesaomo·
@itsJoelOchieng You want to say it is the Odingas low-key supporting Sifuna as a bargaining chip to maintain ODM DUALITY like Raila used to do; 1 leg in strongly in govt & the other strongly in opposition
English
0
0
0
35
Joel Ochieng
Joel Ochieng@itsJoelOchieng·
It's crazy how people don't know how smart Dr. Oburu Oginga is. It's actually laughable.
English
58
10
106
8.5K
Charles Aomo retweetledi
LaBan
LaBan@laban_ach·
Ukienda small claims court kama CLAIMANT. Word of Advice, you are better off going on your own than with those Claimant Applicants we meet huko. Juu wewe kama layman, at least you are afforded protection by Section 32 (see Kamau t/a Sokoni Hardware v Nyutu) ..
English
6
30
271
31.7K
George T. Diano
George T. Diano@georgediano·
Political pundits said this is the trip that made Ruto President. It's a trip that sealed Baba's fate.
George T. Diano tweet media
English
17
50
480
52.3K
Charles Aomo retweetledi
Meme King
Meme King@MemeKingc·
The pause and the 90-degree turn mid-air is sending me 💀😂
English
65
458
6.2K
933.8K
Charles Aomo retweetledi
Wahome Thuku
Wahome Thuku@wahomethuku·
ARE you Permanent and Pensionable? If you are unlawfully dismissed before your retirement age, should you be paid anticipatory salary and allowances for the years you would have served. On the eve of Jamhuri Day last year (11th December 2025) the Supreme Court delivered a landmark judgement that you should read. It was the climax of a labour case that had been in the corridors of the judiciary since 1992. The case was filed by three former employees of Telkom Kenya (formerly Kenya Posts and Telecommunications Corporation) Francis Waithaka Ngokonyo, Sudi Abdalla and Andrew Muga who were retrenched in 1991. Francis was employed as a pupil engineer on June 10, 1973 rising to become Assistant General Manager (Data Processing). Sudi was employed on October 5, 1971 as an Assistant Telecommunications Controller, Grade II and rose to become Area Manager–Nairobi South. Andrew was employed on April 17, 1961 as a Clerical Officer Grade II and rose to become Senior Assistant Manager (Telephone Accounts) On July 19, 1991, they were placed on compulsory leave on grounds of persistent laxity, the particulars of which were not disclosed. Their efforts to seek audience with the the management failed. On October 22, 1991, they were formally retired in public interest. Francis was 41, Sudi 43 and Andrew 50. They were paid gratuity and cumulative pension payments.They filed three separate cases against Telkom Kenya challenging the retrenchment and the cases were then consolidated. They argued that retirement before age of fifty-five (55), amounted to wrongful termination. They therefore sought general and special damages, as well as pension and other benefits. On April 11, 2001 High Court judge Hayanga, awarded Francis Ksh15.7million, Sudi Ksh10.5million and Andrew Ksh2.7million. Unfortunately, the judgement was read by a Deputy Registrar on behalf of the judge, which is contrary to the rules. On July 2, 2004, the Court of Appeal nullified the judgement on that technicality and sent the case back to the High Court for fresh hearing. It went before judge Havelock. On December 20, 2013 Havelock, J) awarded Francis Ksh14,965,568, Sudi Ksh12,783,404, and Andrew Ksh1,874,676.30. Telkom filed an appeal at the Court of Appeal in 2017. The three employees also filed a cross-appeal over the reduction of the initial awards. The main grounds of appeal were that the High Court judge had erred by awarding the three former employees the loss of anticipated salaries and allowances until their projected retirement age. That the judge had failed to appreciate that anticipatory salaries and allowances are too speculative and it is not a fair and reasonable remedy. That the judge failed to appreciate that the retrenched employees were expected to mitigate their losses by securing alternative employment and that an award of anticipatory salaries and allowance amounts to an unjust enrichment. That the judge had failed to consider that employment remedies are not aimed at facilitating the unjust enrichment of aggrieved employees but rather are meant to redress economic injuries in a proportionate way. That he had failed to appreciate that allowances are enjoyed by those in actual employment and not by those who have ceased to be employees. On July 26, 2024, three Court of Appeal judges (Nyamweya, Mativo & Gachoka) held on among other issues that anticipatory salaries and allowances were speculative and amounted to unjust enrichment, as there was no guarantee of service until retirement. The three employees appealed to the Supreme Court in February 2025. They raised a substantial issue regarding anticipatory salaries and allowances in circumstances where employees in the public sector are asked to retire early from employment in the public interest, or for the common good of the government. The issue was canvassed in great length. On December 11, 2025 the Supreme Court delivered the judgement that sealed the debate. 1/2
English
13
55
151
50.4K
Charles Aomo retweetledi
BIG SAMMY 💥
BIG SAMMY 💥@Sammyp36987055·
What an incredible sniper. He doesn’t chase his target… he waits for him to make a mistake and that mistake costs him his life. 😱
English
213
502
12.3K
4.2M
Charles Aomo retweetledi
ephraimnjegafan
ephraimnjegafan@ephraimnjegafan·
The problem with @KRACorporate is applying tax laws like robots while ignoring the lived realities of the taxpayers. There are so many businesses including the government that are not eTIMS compliant. LONG READ
English
8
142
350
22.6K
Charles Aomo retweetledi
Lema
Lema@LemayianLeiyan·
Avoid connecting your email to your WhatsApp, people are seeing bad things out here
English
39
286
3.8K
221.4K
JaPrado.
JaPrado.@Dr_AustinOmondi·
Unacceptable behavior.
Català
92
96
449
32.1K