Chee

A race is on in every Western nation. Replace the indigenous population before they can muster a meaningful resistance.

NOW - Trump says it's good to have 500,000 foreign Chinese students in the U.S. and for China to purchase U.S. farmland; otherwise, colleges and farm prices would collapse: "I frankly think that it's good that people come from other countries and they learn our culture."

They Dont Work for You The folks who warned against the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act ended up being right. They want us to trust them now but they have already been caught repeatedly lying about immigration and its impact on our nation. During the debates in 1964 and 1965 critics in Congress and outside warned that shifting from national origins quotas to family reunification would bring in far more low-skilled immigrants and eventually increase pressure on public benefits, wages, and entitlements. Sponsors like Ted Kennedy and Emanuel Celler repeatedly assured everyone that the bill would not significantly change the demographic makeup of the country or raise welfare costs. They called anyone against them Immigration snobs. They were wrong. The critics were right. What happened next is well documented. The new family-based system triggered chain migration. Low-skilled immigration from Latin America and Asia surged. Over the following decades legal immigrant households began using means-tested benefits at higher rates than native-born Americans in categories such as Medicaid food stamps and housing assistance. By the 1990s the Urban Institute and other researchers documented that immigrant welfare usage was notably higher in many low-income categories. This led to the 1996 welfare reform law that tried to restrict new immigrants from many federal benefits for five years but the underlying demographic shift and entitlement pressure continued. Every immigrant was keen to not only get into the country but immediately enroll their parents on Social Security despite not having paid in. The pattern is clear. The 1965 Act opened the door to larger and less skilled inflows. Those inflows increased demand on taxpayer-funded programs. The very outcomes the critics predicted came true while the rosy assurances from the bill’s supporters did not. This is not ancient history - and it hasn't stopped. It is the foundation of the replacement and dependency machine we see operating today. Sources (APA): U.S. Congress. (1965). Immigration and Nationality Act Amendments of 1965 Public Law 89-236. Congressional Record. (1965). Debates on H.R. 2580 various dates. Fix M. and Passel J. S. (1994). Immigration and welfare: A review of the evidence. Urban Institute. Borjas G. J. (1999). Heaven’s door: Immigration policy and the American economy. Princeton University Press. Camarota S. A. (2003). Back where we started: The effect of the 1965 Immigration Act on the size and composition of the U.S. population. Center for Immigration Studies.

Both the Hart-Celler Act of 1965 and the additions to it in the early 90s need to be repealed. So many examples of putting American citizens last in those pieces of legislation.

HOW IS THIS HAPPENING? The Chinese nationals are required by law (in China) to gather and provide intelligence to the CCP when coming on a student visa WE TAKE 300,000 CHINESE STUDENTS A YEAR! There is CURRENTLY an organized spy ring in our Universities, and it MUST be stopped