陈叶修

@MarshallHayner 还要熬多久

I knew it was coming, now it's here. We have planned and prepared for this moment meticulously and no one is more ready than Metallicus.

@MetalPotus when

$METAL $10,000

买入，买入，买入更多的白银

昨天黑产团队实锤Okx钱包有漏洞 为什么官方没人辟谣 是不是早就知道有内部人士跟坏人有勾当 我的留言有几十人回覆自己也被欧意盗钱包 我估计黑数至少成千上万人 那些被Okx欧意盗跟搞过的 需要你们站出来 回覆你们被盗的经过 给徐明星说安全是底线 这句话打脸！

可笑的建造

@Robertl83909710 刷推浪费时间啊

这个兄弟预测比特币下一步到30万。 我怎么看这个图表像随便画画的！ 你觉得靠谱吗？

@MarshallHayner 发行新美元

If the United States cut spending by 66% and began to pay back the National debt, it could be accomplished in 25 years from now. Within a few years the ability to pay off the debt will become mathematically impossible due to compounding interest. Think about it.

@bsvsimp 卖掉你的老婆

I want to thank my wife for not letting me sell more of our possessions for bsv over the past 5 years 🫶

@Robertl83909710 @FBpizza1 老师放飞自我了？不怕老婆看到

@FBpizza1 喜欢👍

#蓝V互关 来！ 看到就回关👇 评论任意内容/表情/1都算数（不评论默认不回） 一起冲权重～流量互助懂的都懂🔥蓝v互关

@Robertl83909710 还要熬多久

X Money will redraw the map of global finance — fast, cheap, private, permissionless. The old banking world fades; a new era of individual financial freedom begins.

The Machine That Cannot Know Most of what people call “AI intelligence” is a grammatical parlour trick. The system is fluent. It is often persuasive. It can sound like it “knows.” But it doesn’t. It produces syntax—tokens arranged into statistically likely sequences—without semantics—without understanding, reference, or accountability to reality. That distinction isn’t philosophy-club trivia. It is now an institutional fault line. The essay argues that large language models are the modern Chinese Room: fast, huge, and still empty of comprehension. They can generate legal memos, medical summaries, policy briefs, and “research” that looks correct. But they cannot verify truth, because they have no access to truth—only to patterns in training data. That is why “hallucinations” aren’t a bug; they’re a predictable outcome of a system that optimises plausible text, not grounded knowledge. And that brings us straight to Hayek. Hayek’s knowledge problem was never “we need more computing.” It was always: the relevant knowledge for coordination is dispersed, tacit, contextual, and often not articulable—knowledge of time and place, of lived practice, of embodied judgement. The essay connects this directly to what AI systems cannot do: they cannot acquire tacit knowledge, they struggle with edge cases and thin data, and they cannot generate the kind of abductive leaps humans use when the map is incomplete. So the question is not: “Can AI write?” It can. The question is: “Can AI know?” It cannot. Not in the way institutions require when decisions have consequences. That’s the pivot: if AI-generated content floods the information environment, the real problem becomes provenance—traceability, integrity, auditability. Not prophecy. Not vibes. Not “trust the model.” If you care about law, science, markets, governance, or journalism, you should care about this: a world of syntactically perfect text without semantic grounding is a world that demands verification infrastructure—systems that can show where claims came from and what process checked them. Essay: “The Machine That Cannot Know: Why AI Will Never Solve the Knowledge Problem.” open.substack.com/pub/singulargr…

Before they announce they are going to war, I declare that, we as a people, never wanted this war and we will not participate in it or support it. As moral humans, war disgusts us, and we know that the reasons for it are fabricated. Repost and comment if you agree.

@Robertl83909710 @VitalikButerin v神:价值币留给你们了

这是什么意思呀？Vitalik不干啦？ Vitalik ( @VitalikButerin ) 几乎卖掉了钱包“0xfeb”中所有的 19,318 $ETH总价值 3870 万美元，价格为 2,004 美元，只剩下 8.6 $ETH 。

@Imlaomao 流水账似的文章，适合哄小孩。BTC的合理价值是0，高于0全是泡沫。

往事历历在目，内心五味杂陈，超级一手好字，抚平焦躁灵魂。

@GavinMehl 一切都是有设计好了的，没有偶然

WARNING: What if Bitcoin wasn't just invented but ENGINEERED with a 17 year roadmap? What if every price movement was predicted? New mathematical decode of the protocol suggests exactly that. New Video: youtu.be/oQra5ze82DI

严重被美元压制，不过压制不了多久了

@CsTominaga 足够的专业知识，扎实的文字功底。让人读起来如沐春风，醍醐灌顶。真他妈爽

The peculiar tragedy of BTC is not that it failed to conquer the world, but that it abandoned the only weapon with which conquest is possible: utility. An asset that exists merely to be hoarded is not a revolution; it is a trinket. And trinkets, however feverishly admired in their season, are eventually relegated to drawers beside obsolete toys and forgotten enthusiasms. Speculation is not a foundation. It is a mood. Moods shift. Prices flutter. Crowds chant and disperse. What remains, when the applause fades, is the question no one in the frenzy wishes to ask: what is it for? If BTC is nothing more than an object of collective fixation—a digital heirloom to be admired and withheld—then it stands in the same category as every fashionable collectible that mistook temporary obsession for destiny. Markets can be entertained; they cannot be sustained on boredom. An instrument that does not do anything except appreciate in theory will, in practice, depreciate in interest. Human beings require purpose, not merely price. The irony is severe. The only durable justification for BTC is use at scale—broad, relentless, transactional relevance. A system that processes commerce, settles obligations, and embeds itself into the daily mechanics of trade possesses an argument. A system that limits itself into fragility possesses only a slogan. Narratives alone cannot compensate for contraction. One may proclaim digital gold, pristine collateral, immaculate scarcity—but scarcity without function is merely absence. To claim the future of finance, one must be capable of handling finance. To promise replacement, one must be structurally equipped for expansion. Grandeur of language cannot substitute for throughput. The great error was to sacrifice capacity for mythology and then expect mythology to behave like infrastructure. Infrastructure demands scale. Scale demands engineering choices that privilege growth over aesthetic restraint. When scale is deliberately constrained, the claim to inevitability becomes theatre. People do not remain enthralled by inert objects indefinitely. They require a story, yes—but a story anchored in observable power. They must see why it surpasses existing systems, how it renders them obsolete, and by what mechanism it absorbs their functions. Without that, the tale collapses into circular reasoning: it is valuable because it is valuable. A monetary system—if one dares to use the term—must earn its permanence through relentless utility. Without transactional dominance, without practical superiority, without the capacity to carry the weight of global commerce, it is not a challenger to finance. It is a collectible with aspirations. And collectibles, however fervently defended, eventually meet the indifference of time.

@CsTominaga @Ohiocovid1 文字功底深厚啊

Poor thing. The modern attention span expires somewhere between a headline and a paragraph, and anything longer than a slogan is dismissed as machinery. If reading feels like labour, that is not an indictment of prose. It is an admission. No algorithm is required when one has spent years studying language formally. A Master of Fine Arts in Creative Writing tends to leave a mark. Structure, cadence, controlled rhetoric—these are learned skills, not prompts. Concise is useful when the thought is small. When the subject is structural failure in a financial system, compression for the sake of impatience is not virtue; it is vandalism. If the piece was too long, that is fine. Not every room is built for every ceiling height.

他们希望你沉迷于物质，忘记自己的灵魂本质

March 3rd, 2026