cherks

Looking back the last 15+ years, there are 13 instances of a negative RSI divergence on the $SPY that I picked out as significant and track the returns from the end of the confirmation of the divergence. The current divergence is in its 5th week from confirmation (18 Feb 2025). As of end of last week, we have posted -6% drop. This drop is higher than the average -3% drop. There are 4 other times that we have posted minus 5-6% drop (exclude the Covid Crash). And 3 of 4 of those times, we experienced a further drop in the next 4 weeks. #trading #investing #technicals

good content, algorithm please give me more of it thank you

@justinskycak +1 on decision making overlooading

It's easy to think you're tired from doing too much, when really you're tired from deciding too often.

Very inspirational!

@TeslaLarry Yes, SpaceX never did need to compete with airlines for launch site to launch site travel.

Never...is a VERY long time.

@Jake__Wujastyk Do the same for oil prices. What a joke

😂😂😂 I need to start using this tactic

The dinosaurs didn't know him or any of us either 😅

@JPATrades Something is brewing

Iran War must be over if we are back to tariff headlines

@gloccnem A 600kg tuna

this is exactly why i’m scared of the ocean i always thought a tuna fish was small wtf is this

@5149jamesli Agree, we vote with our wallet.

If people pay $9 for a coffee, they will sell you a $9 coffee. Recently PepsiCo had to lower the price of Doritos because they kept increasing their prices and people finally had enough and stopped buying it. The easy solution here is stop going to Starbucks. Simple as that.

@StockSavvyShay Fast ramp up, and faster ramp down

S&P is considering rule changes that would let newly public companies join its indexes faster with Nasdaq weighing a similar move. The shift could pull index demand forward for mega IPOs like SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic & Databricks.

@omgsidewalks The last part is the tough part

Parental “sacrifice” is just a myth. A child's wellbeing is actually a parent's responsibility and not a favour. Any sacrifice is yours to bear, not theirs to repay. Raise them fully cognizant of your challenges but know that it's duty, not charity.

@yatharthmann Will be sick!

Most people don't know this, but Musk Industries is a real corporation owned by Elon Musk.

@mak_aura Best years of youtube

no ads, no youtube shorts, just pure vibes and creativity

@McClellanOsc How do get a trading/investing edge on this?

A falling savings rate is bullish for the stock market. Look at what happens in periods when the savings rate is rising. Note: Covid skews this, like it skewed pretty much everything.

Yesterday I told a struggling trader who had nearly blown out his account late last week (80% drawdown) that the only way to avoid this is to trade just a few times a month (or less). In 2025 I went 4-5 weeks with zero trades. Hence, I’m going to share an article below by Austin Palmer, he says it all perfectly: “Most retail traders believe they need more—more trades, more setups, more indicators, more signals. But in reality, the traders who survive (and thrive) do the opposite. They trade less frequently, reduce the number of decisions, and lock in a fixed risk-to-reward ratio that keeps their edge stable. Here’s why simplifying your trading increases your chances of long-term profitability. 1. Trading Less Reduces Mistakes Every trade is a decision. Every decision carries emotional and cognitive load. The more trades you take: the more tired your brain becomes the more emotional impulses creep in the more likely you are to overreact to noise the more commissions/spreads you pay the more small errors compound into big losses By reducing trading frequency, you automatically reduce the number of opportunities for mistakes. Fewer trades → Higher quality → More consistency. Elite traders don’t take every “okay” trade. They wait for the A+ setups that align perfectly with their plan. 2. Fewer Choices = Lower Variance in Outcomes When you have too many signals, too many strategies, or too many timeframes, your decision-making becomes inconsistent. Choice overload raises the variance in outcomes—you might catch a big win today and then give it all back tomorrow on impulsive trades. Reducing choices tightens your performance curve. When you: trade one setup type focus on one pair or market use one timeframe follow one clear trigger Your results stabilize. The randomness disappears, and your edge becomes measurable. A stable edge is a profitable edge. 3. A Fixed RRR Protects You From Yourself: Most traders blow accounts not because of strategy, but because of inconsistent risk-to-reward ratios. Sometimes they take 1:3, sometimes they settle for 1:1, sometimes they hold for 1:6 and give it back. This inconsistency destroys expectancy. A fixed RRR: forces discipline keeps losses small standardizes wins makes your edge mathematically trackable creates predictable long-term performance Your job is NOT to predict the market. Your job is to control the asymmetry between risk and reward. A consistent 1:2 or 1:3 turns even a 40%-win rate into profitability.” Palmer nailed it. So, ask yourself this question. If you only took 10-12 trades in the entire YEAR but your ARR was 20-30% would that satisfy you? Think of the time savings, less stress, higher compounding over time and less tax headache with wash rules etc.

@BoringBiz_ AI bots

How is Google search still growing 19% year over year with nearly monopoly like market share in the category? Legitimately might be the greatest business ever created in the history of capitalism

@DudeWhoInvests Popcorn 🍿 baby

LMFAO I JUST BELLY LAUGHED IRL. I CAN NOT BELIEVE A PROFESSIONAL ECONOMIST IS THIS FUNNY. 😭 🤣

EVERYTHING IS FINE. 100% TRACK RECORD OF A RECESSION MEANS NOTHING. ECONOMY IS OK. OIL AT $100+ and WE STILL GO TO THE MOON.

That's what Magnus learnt. What about you?

@bernhardsson Just imagine how many manuals and CDs you will have by the end of the year? 😎

It would be kinda cool if we had invented LLMs before the internet and not the other way around.