ChronoscalarDynamics

Exactly that rust is the interplay between the Sun and Jupiter. And the MHD release for Jupiter is cyclical pulsed and devastating. It serves no purpose to go establish a base there resource wise and civilization wise. Mars has no meaningful magnetic core to abate this onslaught.

@chronosdynam79 @CuriosityonX Yes the very obvious reason being rust

First city on Mars is about to be founded, and you get to name it. What's it going to be?

@OrangeJuice6391 @chronosdynam79 @skdh The author claims "it reconstructs arithmetic, all standard elementary transcendental functions, and constants" which is, as I mentioned elsewhere, unclear. There is no clear theorem or statement in the paper, so it is entirely clear what the goal is.

@OrangeJuice6391 @chronosdynam79 @skdh For example, I would consider x^r, for any positive real number r, to be a standard transcendental function, but that's an uncountable family that cannot possibly be retrieved by a countable family of EML+1 compositions.

@chronosdynam79 @skdh To be clear, the paper itself is very vague about what functions are derived from the EML+1 compositions, and the claim that all elementary functions can be constructed in this way may have been a misinterpretation of the (unclear) language of the paper.

@chronosdynam79 @skdh In addition to this, as others have pointed out, there is an uncountable number of elementary (continuous) functions, and the EML construction can only yield a countable number of functions. So the claim that it can generate all elementary functions is not true either.

@CuriosityonX @NASA

@skdh @mathandcobb

@skdh Mathandcobb on Instagram has clearest summary of the problems.

A mathematician has come up with a new way to derive all mathematical operations from merely one. I've had a look at the paper.

@CuriosityonX Hopefully this never happens as it is completely an exercise in futility. The planet is red for distinct an ominous reasons. The main problem is basking in the hyper-destructive Jovian nematic tide. ijqf.org/archives/8149

@RedDukeGames @skdh Red Duke you are kind and correct. Your intuition is spot on!

That’s…wow. I have a lot of reading to do - most of which will be mathematically way over my head. If I read the abstract correctly, this postulates a “geometric substrate”. So, ‘dark topology’, not matter. We’re speaking the same language, you’re just saying it with far, far more precision?

What if dark matter doesn't exist? A short collection of some physicist's opinions (including mine) here: gizmodo.com/what-if-dark-m…

Suppose that space itself has texture at a fine scale? Not only does “empty” space fold around mass, it also grabs and holds it like a kind of friction. Galaxies don’t fly apart because all matter is embedded in something that at the smallest scales grips it just enough to produce the universe we see. Such a thing should be testable, and would eliminate the need for dark matter.

@RedDukeGames @skdh Brilliant Red Duke!!! I agree, proposed, tested, and published. ijqf.org/archives/8110

In standard QM, the constraint comes from this: [x^,p^]=iℏ[\hat{x},\hat{p}] = i\hbar[x^,p^​]=iℏ That implies the uncertainty relation: Δx Δp≥ℏ2\Delta x \, \Delta p \ge \frac{\hbar}{2}ΔxΔp≥2ℏ​ Accordingly, the argument conflates the formal structure of quantum mechanics with the nature of reality. The uncertainty relation follows from a specific complex, continuous representation—where the factor of iii encodes phase and enforces that structure. That doesn’t prove that reality itself is intrinsically “blurry”; it shows that the chosen formulation smooths and encodes dynamics in a particular way. Interpreting that as fundamental is a category mistake.

Before 1927, many physicists believed in something called Laplace’s Demon, the idea that if you knew the position and velocity of every particle in the universe right now, you could calculate the entire future and past perfectly. The universe was imagined as a giant deterministic clock. Heisenberg, and Feynman after him, effectively destroyed that idea like this; “The rule is not that you cannot measure the position and velocity; the rule is that the particle does not have a definite position and a definite velocity at the same time.” It is like asking, “When you run fast toward a loudspeaker, what color is the sound?” The question itself is meaningless, because it does not match the nature of sound. The universe is not blurry because our microscopes are bad. It is blurry because blur is the only way things can exist.

@Math_files Straight up ASD response there.

When told, while working, that his wife was dying, Carl Friedrich Gauss simply responded: -"Ask her to wait a moment - I am almost done".

This is a correct refinement of the two-body picture—replacing a fixed center with a barycenter. But it still assumes continuous, memoryless dynamics. It improves the geometry without changing the evolution law. In particular, features like long-term phase locking between bodies and the presence of small but persistent jitter are not naturally explained in a purely smooth, deterministic framework. ijqf.org/archives/8149