chud.eth

632 posts

chud.eth

chud.eth

@chud_eth

defi strategy @ethena

Katılım Mayıs 2025
451 Takip Edilen9.1K Takipçiler
chud.eth
chud.eth@chud_eth·
joined @ethena to lead defi strategy let's run it all the way back
chud.eth tweet media
English
110
25
747
67K
chud.eth retweetledi
Ethena
Ethena@ethena·
$100 million in Ethena assets on Robinhood Chain, and growing.
Ethena tweet media
English
55
40
330
33.5K
chud.eth
chud.eth@chud_eth·
ethena laying the foundations for the next leverage fuelled expansion of usde all of these earn products provide sticky capital happy to lend consistently for an honest vanilla rate sUSDe APR maintains a decent spread for any length of time and the bigger on-chain yield farmers take care of translating earn product demand into USDe supply
Ethena@ethena

We are excited to partner with @RobinhoodCrypto to bring Ethena's product suite to Robinhood Chain. Ethena has been selected by Steakhouse, the curator of the vault, as the primary collateral asset issuer for Robinhood's first crypto earn product. This is the first decentralized lending product available directly in the Robinhood app.

English
2
2
71
7.7K
chud.eth
chud.eth@chud_eth·
(very) biased take: OUSD most closely resembles USDC; cash/tbill backed and happy to give up the revenue to distribution in the name of growth and penetration. distributors will need to find ways to attract OUSD into *their* app/chain/platform vs. the others, so they can book the revenues as the 'referrer' for distributors with retail facing distribution networks (visa, mc, banks etc.) this is trivial, just better ux for payments i'm sure. for crypto/defi apps & chains, the go to for pmf so far is spraying revs from distribution share into merkl campaigns for aave/morpho/etc. => more cheap borrows for @ethena loopers to capitalize on *if* sUSDe APR can stay elevated above tbills to ensure positive carry. USDT & USDC abundance has been biggest driver of Ethena's growth to date given leverage effect; adding more cash-backed stables that end up subsidizing borrows should do the same
English
4
1
87
10K
chud.eth
chud.eth@chud_eth·
GNO redemption proposal passed, execution in c.1wk, then 2wk window to redeem for underlying treasury assets 🫡
chud.eth tweet media
English
7
1
42
6.4K
Pump.fun
Pump.fun@Pumpfun·
a chud today can be a chad tomorrow
Pump.fun tweet media
English
357
99
939
132.5K
chud.eth
chud.eth@chud_eth·
still got the hands as an onchain operator probably the first manual @aave liquidation in a while wouldn't have been possible without you guys rugging $S @AndreCronjeTech @michaelfkong tysm ❤️❤️❤️
chud.eth tweet mediachud.eth tweet media
English
15
8
199
28.4K
chud.eth
chud.eth@chud_eth·
@0xKarim @lordjorx one small correction, the coolers are 0.5% annualized, not origination - if you repay a day after entering for example, you only pay 0.001% in interest!
English
1
0
2
101
Karim
Karim@0xKarim·
looping OHM cooler loans is looking good here OHM price is $115.97 Backing price is $12 Slippage of a 100k swap into OHM is 3.7% Cooler loan origination fee is 0.5% Assuming you 10x loop cooler loans with 100K starting capital (with slippage and loan fees ofc), then: - you end up with 3.38x leveraged exposure to OHM without risk of being liquidated by price movement - OHM needs to go up in price by 4.22% to break even - (need it to go up by 8% if you want to break even after the slippage fees incurred by unwinding the position) and current buybacks take roughly 4% of the supply out the market each year.
Karim tweet media
English
1
0
1
801
chud.eth
chud.eth@chud_eth·
raising for a european aircon monopoly, $10b val
English
3
0
8
2.2K
chud.eth
chud.eth@chud_eth·
basically some guy from aragon now goes around convincing treasury-holding DAOs that activists are coming for them and it's much better to siphon the treasury to a foundation instead where he can be paid multiple 6 fig salaries to watch over said treasury. excellent paying grift 0 experience managing money btw, only spending it.
English
2
1
56
1.8K
b✭bby
b✭bby@serbobross·
Am I reading this right? @ENS_DAO currently has, essentially a sham proposal to move the entire treasury (almost half a billion in ENS + stables) into the control of the ENS foundation, essentially dissolving its own DAO (don’t worry, members of the security council - who happen to also be nominated future board members of the ENS foundation, seem to think this proposal still leaves full control of the protocol to the DAO, bc they still control the Fee switch, and fee direction to token holders) Anddd there’s absolutely nothing that any DAO participant or token holder can do about it, because the founder of the ENS foundation (nick johnson/nick.eth) has delegated himself more than ~50% of the voting supply?
b✭bby tweet mediab✭bby tweet mediab✭bby tweet mediab✭bby tweet media
English
22
16
131
25.8K
chud.eth
chud.eth@chud_eth·
$100k of yield buys $100k of OHM, then self-borrows $75k from treasury for more buybacks, repeat. So while the treasury contracts in this way, it's never value destructive, backing per OHM never goes down, that's the first point. Treasury per OHM is never burned through. But also, all liquidity is POL, so the stables used for OHM purchases end up in the LP pool, which is also a treasury asset. It just moves from the TRSY module to the LP, moving the price of OHM up. When people sell, they overwhelmingly do so by paying back a cooler loan. So.. income in stables, buys OHM, treasury stables now sit in LP. The way they get removed again is if someone repays their cooler loan (stables into treasury), and sells - so removal of the stables from the LP means you most likely replenish the treasury from the cooler repayment. This is why so many purchases have occurred without meaningfully reducing the treasury balance
English
0
0
6
1.1K
Bojan
Bojan@bjnpck·
@chud_eth Aren’t they just burning through their treasury?
English
2
0
0
306
chud.eth
chud.eth@chud_eth·
bought and burned 16% of FDV in last 3yrs ($41.6m of OHM), continues to do so. current bb rate is ~4%/yr, and you can borrow out 70% LTV at 0.5% APR with no liquidation risk while you wait. if price drops 10% from here, buybacks increase 1.7x to 6.75%/yr of FDV. if price drops 20% from here, buybacks increase 4.25x to 17%/yr of FDV. double the treasury yield and all these numbers double as well. <- watch this space
OlympusDAO |Smart, Money|@OlympusDAO

$OHM's price has eased recently (with most of crypto), and it's worth unpacking what that actually means for the protocol... b/c any confusion around price decline, premium compression, supply contraction mostly traces back to one habit: reading OHM's price the way you'd read any other token's. For almost every other token, a falling price feeds on itself. A lower price pushes holders to sell, the selling pushes the price lower, and so on. Olympus was built to run that loop in reverse. The lower the price goes, the more $OHM the protocol can buy back with the yield its reserves earn (~$50K / week), so the fall itself funds the buying and keeps pulling supply out of the market. The selling that compounds against an ordinary token is what powers the buying here. Behind every $OHM sits a backing (~$12) of real assets, mostly stablecoins. And the protocol won't issue new OHM below backing; it buys OHM back instead. That buyback gets more powerful as the premium compresses: the same reserve yield buys back more OHM the closer the price sits to backing, pulling more supply out of the market (right where an ordinary token would be unraveling). Supply contracting is the design working (not a warning)... Over the last four years the protocol's bought back $156M+ of OHM across its buyback programs.

English
8
4
69
28K
chud.eth
chud.eth@chud_eth·
nailed it - two things to add to your analysis that might make it even more attractive to you: 1. The borrowable Cooler floor is headed to $11.60 per OHM to reflect a recent increase in backing; it's linearly increasing over 6 months to avoid frontrunning, so you'll notice you can borrow more USDS per OHM every day, and your max loss figure decreases a decent chunk if you factor that guaranteed increase in. 2. YRF and CDs are the next two pieces of the puzzle to look into and add into your modelling, both very cool
English
2
0
12
903
Jordi in Cryptoland
Jordi in Cryptoland@lordjorx·
Tempted to start accumulating OHM. @OlympusDAO has changed a lot recently. Now the opportunity isn't just holding OHM. You can use it as collateral for Cooler Loans, borrowing stablecoins at a fixed rate with no liquidation risk. You can loop the position for additional exposure, but that also increases risk. Cleaner structure: > Hold OHM as collateral > Borrow stablecoins through a Cooler Loan at a 0.5% > Deploy the capital into DeFi or loop > Capture the spread There's little value in backtesting this. Pre-2025 OHM was effectively a different protocol, so I'm building a manual framework for entries and exits. For me, this price looks very interesting now.
Jordi in Cryptoland tweet media
chud.eth@chud_eth

bought and burned 16% of FDV in last 3yrs ($41.6m of OHM), continues to do so. current bb rate is ~4%/yr, and you can borrow out 70% LTV at 0.5% APR with no liquidation risk while you wait. if price drops 10% from here, buybacks increase 1.7x to 6.75%/yr of FDV. if price drops 20% from here, buybacks increase 4.25x to 17%/yr of FDV. double the treasury yield and all these numbers double as well. <- watch this space

English
9
3
39
10K
chud.eth
chud.eth@chud_eth·
hey @saylor if governments can do it, why can't you? let's innovate
chud.eth tweet media
English
0
0
5
1.6K
chud.eth
chud.eth@chud_eth·
without hyperliquid we'd still have people making up defi ponzis and burning ultrasound money instead of gambling on stocks truly evil protocol
English
6
5
82
5.3K
chud.eth
chud.eth@chud_eth·
@aiden0x4 pls recheck your math, you have a fundamental flaw somewhere. impossible to consume backing.
English
0
0
1
307
aiden
aiden@aiden0x4·
@chud_eth price will keep going down, and bbs will keep consuming treasury yield and treasury backing. send it to zero
English
2
0
0
535
chud.eth
chud.eth@chud_eth·
@palis nope, you've missed the entire point. if token price goes down 20% usually then you do 1/0.8 = 1.25x more buybacks. Here, it's 4.25x. It's exponentially more, not just linear which is what applies to every other token.
English
0
0
8
409
⟠Palis⟠🐍
⟠Palis⟠🐍@palis·
@chud_eth QT is a really long tweet to say something that applies to every token that does buybacks, which is lower token price = more tokens bought given same revenue
English
2
0
3
712