claire

@iamAtheistGirl Have you ever heard of punctuation?

because he literally stalks my twitter a part of me was scared for leaving those tweets up because when he’s angry he actively tries to make my life more difficult but then i realized that he needs to see the comments and understand it’s not just me that finds his behavior unacceptable and abusive. you don’t get to make me ask you if i can have a beer and then refuse to understand how that’s controlling someone.

@iamAtheistGirl Even more reason to respect the man.

you can pretend like chuck norris was a good guy but he was anti-lgbtq, anti-science, he believed god should be forced into everything and often talked about how immoral atheism was. he was a conspiracy theorist, who pushed vaccines were dangerous. and he was a staunch christian nationalist trump supporter. him dying doesn’t change any of this. an asshole is an asshole whether they’re dead or alive.

@crypto_dragonz Cunthill

Drop a comment and Repost 👇👇👇

Something to brighten your day. Keir Starmer booed by the crowd as he arrives at Westminster Abbey for the Commonwealth Day celebrations. 🤣🥳

NEW🚨: 78 female Democrats in Congress just voted to bury the release of sexual misconduct reports on their colleagues. The very same ones who scream about Epstein nonstop….👀 Protecting victims? Nah. Protecting the club. Irony level: off the charts. 😂 H/T: @ginamilan_

THE DONALD TRUMP FILES What about Donald Trump? Isn't he in the Epstein files? Well, we have now read 1.39 million DOJ documents in the Epstein case. Every one. We have built investigation dossiers on eight people: Bill Gates (2,265 documents), Woody Allen (2,613), Reid Hoffman (1,976), Bill Clinton (1,586), Larry Summers (739), Leon Black (667), Elon Musk (55), and Donald Trump. For Donald Trump, across the entire corpus, we found 40 documents. Not 40 damning documents. 40 documents total -- every sworn deposition, every FBI interview, every civil complaint, every flight log entry, every media reference of any kind linking Trump to Epstein in the largest document production in DOJ history. As with Elon, the number is the story. And as with Elon, the documents themselves tell that story even better. Every quote below is verbatim. Every citation is a DOJ document number you can verify. Click the links. This post comes from those links. There are just 40. You can read them yourself. THE FRIENDSHIP It must be made clear: Trump and Epstein were friends. This must be stated plainly, because everything that follows only makes sense if you understand that. They were Palm Beach neighbors in the 1990s. Both owned waterfront estates. Both moved in the same Manhattan social circles -- the dinner-party circuit that included Mort Zuckerman, Leon Black, Ronald Perelman, and a dozen other New York billionaires. In March 2003, Vanity Fair profiled Epstein as "The Talented Mr. Epstein" and named Trump as one of seven businessmen who dined at his 71st Street townhouse [187-11]. Juan Alessi, Epstein's house manager, named Trump among many prominent visitors to the Palm Beach property [055-12]. A 1993 photograph shows Trump and Marla Maples with Epstein and Maxwell at a New York party [EFTA00787056]. This was before Epstein's convictions. In 2002, reached by phone for a New York Magazine profile, Trump gave the currently most weaponized quote in the entire archive: "I've known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it -- Jeffrey enjoys his social life." [EFTA00013640] That quote has been cited thousands of times. It was given on speakerphone, before any public allegations, before any investigation, before any reason to be cautious. "It is even said that" is hearsay framing -- Trump reporting what others say. "On the younger side" is ambiguous. But the quote exists, and it reflects a social warmth that post-Epstein scandal Trump would prefer to erase. In 2003, Ghislaine Maxwell assembled a leather-bound album for Epstein's 50th birthday. Trump's contribution: a card with "several lines of typewritten text framed by the outline of a naked woman, which appears to be hand-drawn with a heavy marker," signed below the waist [senate_judiciary_to_bondi]. These are the facts, and the facts must be stated openly. The friendship was real. But what happened next matters more. THE FALLING OUT Around 2004, that friendship ended. Trump outbid Epstein at auction for the Maison de L'Amitie estate in Palm Beach. In Michael Wolff's 2017 recordings, Epstein himself confirmed the real estate dispute as the breaking point [wolff_tapes_transcript_exhibit]. But the real estate dispute was simply the excuse that Epstein made for something darker. Brad Edwards, the attorney who represented Epstein's victims, established under oath that Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after Epstein sexually assaulted an underage girl at the club [773-04]. There is no documented contact between Trump and Epstein after the falling out in 2004. Not one email. Not one phone call. Not one schedule entry. Not one reference of any kind in 1.39 million documents. After 2004, the relationship was over. Trump had drawn a hard line. THE GIRL IN THE SPA Virginia Roberts was sixteen years old, earning nine dollars an hour as a locker room attendant at Mar-a-Lago [1218-11]. In her memoir, she described the club in awestruck terms -- "sheer awe at the gold arches." Ghislaine Maxwell approached her while she was reading a book about massage [EFTA01689026]. "I was working at Donald Trump's spa in Mar-a-Lago and I was prompted by Ghislaine to come to Jeffrey's mansion in Palm Beach that afternoon after work." [1090-16] Roberts names many powerful men in her testimony. Clinton. Prince Andrew. Dershowitz. Wexner. She does not name Trump. He was the property owner. But Maxwell did the recruiting. An FBI interview of a different victim's mother captures how this worked: she "heard that a prince and DONALD TRUMP visited EPSTEIN's house and this made [her] think that if they are there then how could EPSTEIN be a criminal" [EFTA00089603]. That is what Epstein did with famous names. He wore used them as bait. As camouflage. If Epstein was associated with so-and-so, then how could he be a predator? Trump, unlike others, immediately put a stop to that. THE ACCUSATIONS Three allegations against Trump exist in the corpus. A Jane Doe civil lawsuit against Epstein's estate alleges that Epstein introduced her to Trump when she was fourteen, "allegedly elbowing Trump and saying, 'This is a good one, right?' Trump smiled and nodded in agreement" [1078-5]. At the Maxwell trial, a victim testified under oath that Epstein introduced her to Trump and took her to Mar-a-Lago when she was fourteen [120-cr-00330/745]. That testimony confirmed the social introduction. It contained no allegation of misconduct by Trump. Defense counsel used Trump's name to establish Epstein's social reach, not to implicate Trump. In 2016, during the presidential campaign, a civil complaint alleged the rape of a thirteen-year-old at Epstein's 71st Street house in the summer of 1994 -- Katie Johnson v. Trump & Epstein [EFTA01386393]. It was filed pro se, dismissed for improper filing, refiled with an attorney, and dropped before trial. It was never proven, never tested under cross-examination, never corroborated by any other witness in the criminal investigation. In August 2017, Epstein told Michael Wolff on tape: "I was Donald's closest friend for 10 years" [wolff_tapes_transcript_exhibit]. He claimed Trump liked to "f--- the wives of his best friends" and that Melania first slept with Trump on Epstein's plane. These recordings were released days before the 2024 election. They are unsworn claims by a convicted pedophile and serial liar to an author -- a man who told the same journalist his week included "woody allen, elon musk, frank gehri... bill gates" [EFTA02561193]. And that pedophile and liar had an axe to grind. A big one. Those are the allegations. What follows is what happened when they were investigated. THE INVESTIGATION The FBI investigated Donald Trump in connection with the Epstein case. The master case index lists him as a "positive case hit" with "salacious information": "Donald Trump (one identified victim claimed abuse by Trump but ultimately refused to cooperate)" [EFTA00161528]. One allegation. One victim who refused to cooperate. No prosecution. The FBI's National Threat Operations Center received four separate complaints naming Trump [EFTA01660679]. A hearsay oral sex claim via a friend-of-friend chain. An anonymous party guest list. A claim about "big orgy parties" from a sixteen-year-old model. A Trump Golf Course allegation "deemed not credible." All anonymous. None corroborated. The Senate Judiciary Committee -- bipartisan, Grassley and Durbin -- reported that FBI personnel were specifically instructed to "flag" any records in which President Trump was mentioned across all 1.39 million documents. The result: no incriminating "client list." No evidence of criminal conduct [senate_judiciary_to_bondi]. The Southern District of New York, which prosecuted the Epstein case, had Trump's phone records in their evidence. Their grand jury presentation includes a message slip showing Trump called Epstein on November 1, 2000 -- a routine call, no message content [EFTA00008599]. The same presentation, same pages, includes message slips reading "She has females for Mr. J.E." Prosecutors had Trump's innocuous call alongside explicit trafficking procurement. They found nothing to charge. Attorney General William Barr, under oath before the House Oversight Committee: "I was never informed of the evidence, and I'm skeptical there is any... if they had evidence, this would've been low-hanging fruit." [oversight_republican_staff_memo] THE ATTORNEY WHO WOULD KNOW Brad Edwards represented Epstein's victims for years. He investigated every lead. He subpoenaed records, deposed witnesses, and built the case that led to federal prosecution. He was the attorney most motivated to find evidence against anyone connected to Epstein. In April 2010, Edwards filed a sworn affidavit: "While research by other plaintiffs' attorneys and myself has uncovered other persons that were acquaintances of Mr. Epstein, specifically Donald Trump, Alan Dershowitz, Bill Clinton, Tommy Mottola, and David Copperfield, we have no information that any of those people (other than Mr. Dershowitz) have spoken to Mr. Epstein about Jane Doe or any of the other specific victims of Mr. Epstein's molestation." [560-03] Edwards' attorney Jack Scarola: "There is no evidence the President was involved in Epstein's schemes" [773-04]. Edwards filed a notice to depose Trump in September 2009 [701]. As a witness. Not as a suspect. He sought Trump's testimony to help the victim's case. And there is this: when Edwards was investigating Epstein, reaching out to the powerful men in Epstein's orbit for cooperation, Trump was the only person who picked up the phone and returned his call [50-2009-CA-040800/549]. The attorney who spent years investigating on behalf of Epstein's victims -- who had every reason to find evidence, every incentive to implicate the powerful -- swore under oath that his investigation found nothing linking Trump to the abuse. When he called, Trump answered. Readily. Trump knew what Epstein was and wanted to talk about it. WHAT THE DOCUMENTS DON'T SHOW Pilot David Rodgers flew Epstein's planes for twenty-eight years. He sat for a seventeen-page FBI interview and reviewed his flight logs covering 1991 through 2007 [EFTA00159180]. Trump appears once: Flight 934, January 5, 1997. Passengers: Epstein, Maxwell, Donald Trump, Mark Epstein, and Didier, a chef. Route: Palm Beach to Newark. No flight in the corpus shows Trump traveling to Little Saint James, to Zorro Ranch, or to any international destination on Epstein's aircraft. Epstein's famous ninety-two-page personal contact book does not contain a "Donald Trump" entry [black-book-redacted]. It lists Robert and Blaine Trump, Ivana Trump, Ivanka Trump, and Trump Management Inc. -- the socialite channel, not Donald. There are zero financial transactions between Trump and Epstein in any direction. No donations. No investments. No advisory fees. No foundation grants. Even Epstein's own defense lawyers, in a motion to pare down a 169-person witness list, argued that Trump had "no connection at all" to the case [1338]. And Epstein himself, in a draft letter, grouped Trump among "friends and other innocent bystanders" whose names had been dragged in by "abusive discovery" [EFTA01128737]. THE COMPARISON The Epstein documents reveal concentric circles of association. At the center: people who were financially entangled, who visited the island repeatedly, who maintained the relationship through and after Epstein's conviction. Trump was not in any of these circles. Woody Allen: 2,613 documents. Nine years of regular contact. Dinner companion. Epstein attended his film shoots. Bill Gates: 2,265 documents. Multiple confirmed meetings. Donations routed through Epstein. Boris Nikolic named in Epstein's will. Reid Hoffman: 1,976 documents. 36 documented gift exchanges. Slept at Epstein's 71st Street mansion. Bill Clinton: 1,586 documents. 147 sexually explicit messages with Maxwell. Multiple confirmed island visits. Flights on Epstein's plane confirmed by his pilot ("ten or twenty times"). Active participation in the post-arrest denial campaign. Larry Summers: 739 documents. Regular dinner companion. Island visits with family. Harvard Program for Evolutionary Dynamics funded through Epstein. Leon Black: 667 documents. $158 million paid to Epstein across a decades-long financial relationship. Elon Musk: 55 documents. Zero financial transactions. Twenty-two months of sporadic, taciturn emails with Epstein chasing Musk, but leaving Epstein little to grab onto. Donald Trump: 40 documents. Zero financial transactions. Zero island visits. One commuter flight. A friendship that ended in 2004, eleven years before the first federal prosecution, after Trump drew the line and Epstein was banned from Mar-a-Lago for his behavior. The only person in Epstein's orbit who returned the victim's attorney's call. Trump's entire file is 1.8% the size of Gates's. WHAT REMAINS These documents show a man who was part of an early social world he did not yet completely understand, who called a predator "terrific" before anyone knew what that predator was, who sent a crude birthday card before there was any reason not to, whose property was used as a hunting ground without his knowledge or permission -- and who, when the investigation came, banned the predator from his club, picked up the phone for the victim's attorney, and was cleared by every investigative body that looked. 40 documents. Every quote verbatim. Every citation verifiable. Full compendium (40 docs): drive.google.com/file/d/1HhFLNr… AI-optimized compendium (upload to any LLM and ask it anything): drive.google.com/file/d/1Sl1Su1…

@realstewpeters @RapidResponse47 @POTUS They're killing their own daughters!! Wake the fuck up!!!

@RapidResponse47 @POTUS You’re bombing their kids. Why the fuck would they lay down their arms? You retarded or something?

.@POTUS: "I'm once again calling on all members of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, the military, and the police to lay down their arms. They're only going to be killed. Now is the time to stand up... and help take back your country."

@TRADING_FLIGHT @dom_lucre What is his name please?

@dom_lucre Its à french influencer and he is à scammer and he tried to make Child from africa come illégaly in France with fake identity documents, surely to sell them. So yes its totally disturbing.

🔥🚨DEVELOPING: This volunteer has created a lot of debate online from this interaction with this child in Africa.

@models_by_Russ The article I read said a family of 3 was costing £158000 a year? That's £432 a day? Yet our minimum wage is less than £12.21 per hour, less than £100 a day without taking off tax and NI? A working single parent with 2 kids in childcare doesn't get nearly £432 a day top up. 😡

Just listened to a British mum break down in tears on LBC. Three children. Facing eviction. At the end of her rope and she doesn’t know where to turn. You could hear the panic in her voice. Not anger, not politics — just a mum terrified she’s about to lose the roof over her children’s heads. That’s the reality for a lot of people in this country right now. People working, trying their best, paying their taxes, doing everything they were told was the “right way” to live. And yet they’re the ones falling through the cracks. Now here’s where the madness kicks in. Because in the same country, with the same taxpayer money, we have politicians floating the idea of giving £40,000 to illegal immigrants to leave the UK voluntarily. Let’s just pause and read that phrase again. Illegal immigrant. The clue is literally in the first word — illegal. Someone who has entered or remained in the country unlawfully… and the brilliant solution from our political class is apparently to hand them forty thousand pounds and politely ask them to leave. You couldn’t make it up. So let’s get this straight. A British mum is crying on national radio because she can’t keep a roof over her kids’ heads… …but if you arrive in the country illegally, the big brain policy idea is to hand you £40,000 of taxpayers’ money as a goodbye present. Do not pass Go. Do not collect £200. Except now the rule seems to be: Do collect £40,000. No wonder people are furious. No wonder people feel the system is upside down. This isn’t about hating anyone. It’s about basic fairness. If the country can find tens of thousands of pounds to hand out to people who shouldn’t be here in the first place, then how on earth can we not find the support to stop a British mother and her children becoming homeless? Where are the priorities? Because from the outside it looks like the people running this country are completely detached from the reality most of us are living in. People working hard, paying taxes, trying to raise families — while decisions made in Westminster feel like they come from another planet entirely. Listening to that poor woman today was heartbreaking. And if our politicians had even a fraction of the common sense most ordinary people have, they’d realise something very simple: A government’s first responsibility should always be to the people already living in the country. But judging by policies like this… that basic principle seems to have been completely forgotten. And that’s exactly why so many people feel like this country is being run by people who haven’t got the faintest clue what life is actually like outside Westminster.

@ShabanaMahmood 12 months or more....

If you pose a risk to our country, you will be refused entry or removed.

@9mmballpoint Movies

This has made me genuinely curious about something: if you're white, and you didn't grow up in an explicitly racist household, how did you first learn about the n-word? I can't imagine there's a standard procedure for that sort of thing.

@TheGriftReport Sorry, I need to go, I think I left the iron on....

Hard mode 😂😂

@paolagalloni They do this in the Anglican churches in South Africa, or they did in the 80s.

Born and raised in Italy, catholic schools, catholic university… never seen this thing. Not even the pope. Whatever Americans touch becomes a circus.

@HazelAppleyard Guess who's taking it up the bum!!

Do you think Rupert Grint will care when his daughters are older and may have to share bathrooms or changing rooms with grown men?

FLASHBACK: British royal advisor caught on hidden camera exposing to a James O’Keefe undercover journalist that Prince Andrew was having sex with underage girls: “I was pissed. He was lying about f**cking underage girls.”

@WallStreetMav He wasn't arrested because he's a pervert.

So the UK arrests former Prince Andrew for Epstein, but the Pakistanis raping White English girls get a free pass?

@TraceyCatt79183 @796763 @Chris_Davies Lourens van der Post Peter Ball Mountbatto

@796763 @Chris_Davies Saville need I say more

I’m a royalist and a monarchist. In the best interests of the institution, it is time for King Charles to abdicate immediately. His position is untenable.

@796763 @Chris_Davies Have a look into the 4 mentors of Charles III. The tampon king is just as dirty as his brother.

@Chris_Davies Well, I'm not a royalist or a monarchist, really (though I'm not a very committed republican, either), but I DON'T think Charles should abdicate. Why not? Because HE IS NOT HIS BROTHER. He is INNOCENT and doesn't deserve to be tarred with his brother's brush.

@ToonDazza 🤣 🤣 🤣

Wow - nearly knocked one out there……