Clay

366 posts

Clay banner
Clay

Clay

@clay_phi

@_GameFrame_ | ex @AzraGames | @WolvesDAO | Front End Quant | Architect

Houston, TX Katılım Nisan 2020
149 Takip Edilen263 Takipçiler
Clay
Clay@clay_phi·
- you buy an Epic Pass - you go to Vail - you get put in the slow lift line - Back Bowls require an extra day ticket - Blue Sky Basin is closed to pass holders - powder days are charged against your pass at full day-ticket rates - the gondola randomly doesn’t work for members - you can’t bring your own skis anymore, they make you use their busted rentals This is what Claude Max is becoming. Anthropic keeps trying to frame Claude Max as if subscription users were getting some charitable subsidy because the API-equivalent token cost would be higher. That’s not a subsidy. That’s membership pricing. Creative Cloud vs buying every Adobe app separately. Amazon Prime vs paying shipping on every order. A museum membership vs one-time admission. An Epic Pass vs daily lift tickets. The whole point of a membership is that the vendor gets predictable recurring revenue and the customer gets bundled access at a better effective rate. That isn’t charity. That’s the product. The issue is now worse than raising membership prices: They’re doing SaaS pay to win. - extra cost for programmatic usage - Blocking harnesses - Other features like /fast are gated - Rate limiting They’re putting smaller portions and worse ingredients in your meal kit sub. Claude Max wasn’t a subsidy. It was membership pricing. Now it’s just becoming a shitty membership.
English
0
0
0
31
Clay
Clay@clay_phi·
@Layton_Gott Like saying Vail is eating the costs if you go there with an Epic Pass instead of daily lift tickets. You simply aren’t right
English
1
0
1
24
Layton Gott
Layton Gott@Layton_Gott·
Anthropic just split Claude billing and opened the biggest door Codex has ever had. Starting June 15, your Claude Pro sub only covers you typing prompts. Anything programmatic gets a separate metered credit. $20 for Pro. $100 for Max 5x. $200 for Max 20x. it doesn't roll over. I get why they did it. People were paying $20 a month and running agents that burned hundreds of dollars in compute. Anthropic was eating that difference on every power user. You can't run a business like that forever. So they had three options. Raise prices. Ban third party tools. Or split the pool. They picked the cleanest one. Don't get me wrong I still think the change sucks if you're a heavy user like I am. Then on the same day, Sam Altman dropped 2 free months of Codex for anyone who switches. A lot of devs will take it. I won't. I'm sticking with both. OpenAI and Anthropic are going to keep doing what the other one does worse. Switch every time one of them changes pricing and you'll never have a stable workflow.
Layton Gott tweet mediaLayton Gott tweet media
English
20
2
35
7K
The AI Investor
The AI Investor@The_AI_Investor·
Jensen Huang and Michael Dell discussed the supply bottleneck: Michael - memory is the challenge. Jensen - we will have billions of agents, and we will need to give each agent essentially its own computer to use.
English
31
102
1K
140.7K
Clay
Clay@clay_phi·
@GergelyOrosz Situation 3: dev A thinks approach X is correct, launches adversarial debate panel with 10 parallel agents to decide if it is or isn’t.
English
0
0
2
225
Gergely Orosz
Gergely Orosz@GergelyOrosz·
Situation 1: dev A thinks approach X is correct, dev B thinks Y is the right way. They argue and try to convince each other. Situation 2: dev A thinks approach X is correct, tells the LLM to implement it. There is SO MUCH learning in Situation 1, lost when using LLMs....
English
164
75
1.4K
141.8K
Jon Stokes
Jon Stokes@jon_stokes·
@clay_phi No, because I'm not a Chamath fan and I want to signal that lest someone mistake me for one. If he even sees it, Chamath won't care.. he's a big boy and he knows he's a polarizing figure.
English
3
0
27
3.1K
Clay
Clay@clay_phi·
@garrytan BJs is gross but Haidilao is not exactly analogous typical Chinese fare.
English
1
0
2
2.4K
Garry Tan
Garry Tan@garrytan·
I went to BJ's Restaurant last night with my kids. The bathroom was disgusting. The front of house was kind but sloppy and slow. The food upset my stomach and I woke up at 4am this morning because of it. Whoever BJ is, they probably aren't a real person, because everyone acted like nobody's name is on the door. I studied the management history of BJ's. The original founders left after the seventh location. Then it was sold to their accountants. Then it went public. Then the CEO resigned last year after 19 years and was replaced by an interim board member from Darden Restaurants, who was then replaced by a "Chief Concept Officer" promoted to CEO. The CFO also quit. Roaches behind the takeout counter in Coral Springs. Rodent droppings and mold in the ice machine in Pembroke Pines. An "F" retention score on Comparably. Glassdoor reviews that say "management turnover is high... that should say quite a bit about the company culture." Seven layers of management between the person cooking your food and anyone who owns the outcome. General manager reports to area director reports to regional director reports to regional VP reports to SVP of Operations reports to the COO (who started in January) reports to the CEO (who started last year). 218 locations. Founders long gone. Managers rotate every 18 months. The kitchen is run by compliance checklists, not pride. A dirty bathroom is nobody's personal failure because it's nobody's personal restaurant. This is the stewardship crisis in America in one building. In Chinese restaurants, the 老板 (laoban) is there. He tastes the food. He watches the kitchen. His family's reputation is the business. The restaurant is clean not because of health inspectors but because his name is on it. Haidilao built a $30B hot pot chain with less than 10% employee turnover. Servers can give you free dishes without asking a manager. Why? Because they're treated like stewards, not interchangeable parts. The West replaced stewardship with professional management. MBAs who optimize spreadsheets for people they've never met. CEOs who've never touched the product they sell. Politicians who sign the bills and spend the people's money but never checked the money built anything that helped the people they claimed to care about. Founder mode isn't new. It's the oldest idea in Chinese business culture. We just forgot it. The best founders I fund at YC are natural stewards. They own the outcome. They're in the kitchen tasting the food. They care about the bathroom. Most of society's problems are a stewardship crisis. Not a lack of resources or technology or intelligence. A lack of people who give a shit because their name is on it.
Garry Tan tweet media
English
375
152
2.6K
484.6K
Aish
Aish@AishwaryaDevv·
Why use Hermes or OpenClaw? Genuine question. The more I use these AI assistant wrappers, the more they feel like overlays with memory bolted on. If I can build my own AI-agnostic agent with skills, rules, context files, and a feedback loop that keeps it updated… what’s the actual value add? Is it just faster skill setup? Better tooling? Less maintenance? I even had to wipe Hermes memory because it got full. Feels like I’m missing something. People using Hermes/OpenClaw heavily, what am I not seeing?
English
136
4
153
55.9K
Clay
Clay@clay_phi·
@TristenPalori If you don’t have engrained in your DNA the innate desire to work with your hands on the land, you need to see a low T specialist.
English
0
0
0
88
Tristen Palori | Commercial Real Estate
Can someone explain to me why people do cosmetic yard work for 4+ hours every weekend? Wait, so the 10 seconds you see it when you leave/enter your home makes it all worth it? I just can’t think of a worse way to spend my time.
English
2.6K
42
1.9K
575.7K
Clay
Clay@clay_phi·
@ellie_huxtable When they crash and I have to restore 50 Claude sessions with /resume based on the last message sent….so I built a workaround wrapper
English
0
0
0
17
Ellie Huxtable
Ellie Huxtable@ellie_huxtable·
what annoys you most when using a terminal?
English
54
1
29
8K
Clay
Clay@clay_phi·
@litocoen Why doesn’t Rolex just sell a few at cost watches
English
0
0
0
37
lito
lito@litocoen·
flying dubai to sydney 80% of business class is empty why would they not sell those seats for dirt cheap or give them away to select economy passengers? all the costs are sunk costs (personal, fuel, food etc.) anyway at the point of departure
lito tweet media
English
637
28
2.6K
2.1M
Clay
Clay@clay_phi·
@paulbohm PwC Claude certified Karens for $750/hr 😂
Indonesia
0
0
0
544
Paul Bohm
Paul Bohm@paulbohm·
Anthropic knows they are weeks away from AGI, which is why they are working with companies like Accenture, Deloitte, PwC, and others to build "joint centers of Excellence" and training and certifying 30,000 PwC professionals on Claude.
English
170
129
3.4K
630.8K
Clay
Clay@clay_phi·
@DivyanshT91162 Anthropic: send us all of your code IP owners: okie dokie
English
0
0
3
867
divyansh tiwari
divyansh tiwari@DivyanshT91162·
Claude Code suddenly makes WAY more sense after installing this official Anthropic plugin 🤯 It reads your entire project and instantly tells you what you should actually enable, use, and configure. The crazy part? Most people using Claude Code don’t even know this exists. → Detects your stack automatically → Understands your codebase structure → Suggests the right workflows → Removes the confusing setup phase → Makes Claude Code feel 10x smarter This is probably the real onboarding Claude Code needed 🔥
English
40
102
1.6K
221.4K
Clay
Clay@clay_phi·
@chamath How are you going to route to opus or gpt in a way that the model won’t get your prompt/context? Only way around this is local models
English
0
0
1
811
Chamath Palihapitiya
If you are running a consulting business and you are deploying Anthropic or OpenAI directly into your organization (I’m looking at you PwC and Accenture) you are letting the fox into the hen house. OpenAI and Anthropic are openly funding and starting competitors to you while also using your usage to drive more success for them. This is not a failure on their part but a failure on your part. Consulting businesses that understand this are adopting a control plane that allows them to arbitrate where tokens go and who generates tokens for them. Controlling the tokens is controlling the spice (Dune). This was a key pillar of 8090’s global partnership with EY and they key feature of our Software Factory. We control token generation and can direct them to any model provider. We are close to another global partnership and will announce it soon. These organizations refuse to accept the disruption standing still or, even worse, by adopting and accelerating the companies who want to disrupt them.
Milk Road AI@MilkRoadAI

Chamath just delivered the clearest diagnosis of what is happening to enterprise software and the OpenAI Deployment Company is the most damning piece of evidence he could have picked. "The low end of the market is basically finished. There is no safe space." 90% of public SaaS stocks are down 30-80% from their 52 week highs, the median software stock is now negative over the last 3-6 months. Goldman Sachs reported that software forward P/E multiples fell from 35x to 20x, the lowest absolute level since 2014 and the smallest premium to the S&P 500 since 2010. The low end died first and fastest, because AI replaced it most directly. The small business tools, the lightweight project managers, the single function SaaS products that charged $49 a month per seat, those are being replaced by AI agents that do the same work as a workflow, not a product. You do not buy an AI powered tool, you describe what you need and it builds it and the seat based model that created the SaaS industry simply does not apply to that transaction. But Chamath's more interesting argument is about the high end and the tell he points to is perfect. OpenAI just raised $4 billion from 19 investors including TPG, Brookfield, Bain, and McKinsey to launch a consulting company and guaranteed those investors a 17.5% annual return to do it. On $4 billion in committed capital, that is roughly $700 million per year in guaranteed payouts, owed by a company that is projected to lose $14 billion in 2026. The goal of this venture is to compete directly with Deloitte, PwC, Ernst & Young, Andersen, and Cognizant. Think about what that structure reveals. OpenAI lost half of its enterprise LLM API market share from 50% to 25% between late 2023 and mid-2025, with Anthropic now leading at 32%. Its response was not to build a better model but rather to raise $4 billion, offer guaranteed PE-tier returns and hire embedded engineers to physically sit inside client organizations and make AI actually work in production. The reason, as Chamath identified, is that the high end of the market is not easy. "It's not like boop boop boop, put in a prompt and beep bap boop, it all works," he said and the data confirms exactly that. 88% of organizations running AI agents reported a security incident in the past year, 42% of C-suite executives say AI adoption is creating internal organizational conflict. The average enterprise AI consulting implementation costs $228,000 in year one versus $77,000 for platform-based approaches and most still stall before reaching production. Anthropic immediately matched OpenAI with a competing $1.5 billion consulting venture backed by Blackstone, Goldman Sachs, and Hellman & Friedman bringing the combined spend by the two leading AI labs on human powered enterprise deployment to $5.5 billion in a single month Chamath's read is that the high end, the large enterprise platforms like Salesforce with proprietary data flywheels, Palantir with its FDE model already proven at scale, Oracle with vertical specific data moats will survive and consolidate. The mid-market point solutions, the single function tools, the lightweight enterprise apps without defensible data assets, those are on the conveyor belt. The AI industry is not just disrupting the companies that use software but rather disrupting the companies that sell it.

English
298
394
4.3K
2M
Clay
Clay@clay_phi·
@Fxhedgers Been above there for over a decade
English
0
0
0
18
FXHedge
FXHedge@Fxhedgers·
Margin debt usage for stock trading is at an all-time record. As a percentage of the economy, it is above the levels of the 2000 internet bubble and the financial crisis of 2008.
FXHedge tweet media
English
42
147
596
122K
Clay
Clay@clay_phi·
@SamaHoole Everyone’s a victim of something. Go work out
GIF
English
0
0
0
5
Sama Hoole
Sama Hoole@SamaHoole·
Here's the thing nobody mentions about seed oils. You stop eating them tomorrow. Brilliant. You've done the work. You've thrown out the rapeseed oil, you've stopped ordering the chips, you've made peace with the awkward conversation at the restaurant. You're not out of the woods. Linoleic acid has a half-life in your fat tissue of approximately 680 days. Not 680 hours. Not 680 minutes. Days. Roughly two years for half of what you've already stored to be metabolised out. In the meantime, it sits there. In adipose tissue. In the phospholipid bilayer of every cell membrane you own. In the cardiolipin of your mitochondria, the membrane your energy production depends on. Sitting. Waiting. Polyunsaturated fats have two or more double bonds. Double bonds are weak points. Weak points oxidise. When they oxidise, they produce 4-hydroxynonenal and a small library of related aldehydes that adduct to proteins, damage DNA, and trigger the inflammatory cascade your body spends most of its energy trying to suppress. The fat in your love handles is not inert. It is a slow-burning fuse made of stored seed oil from every chip shop dinner and supermarket dressing of the last decade, waiting for the next oxidative spark to set it off. The spark is a virus. A drink. A bad night's sleep. A workout. A stressful Tuesday. Adipose linoleic acid in the average modern person has increased 136% over the last fifty years. You are walking around with kindling under your skin. Quitting the oils is the start, not the finish. It is a two-year project of letting your body slowly metabolise out a decade of stored damage, replacing fragile membranes with stable ones, and rebuilding the tissue you live in from a different substance. You begin today. You finish in 2028.
English
107
723
3.4K
146.1K
Clay
Clay@clay_phi·
@Andercot I think you’re short a few mph
English
0
0
0
48
Andrew Côté
Andrew Côté@Andercot·
Everything in the universe is falling through time at the speed of light, which doesn't even feel that fast tbh
English
29
2
133
9.5K
Clay
Clay@clay_phi·
@RepJackKimble Would be interesting to see what you can get done in the Pvt sector with a part time schedule like this
English
0
0
1
228
Rep. Jack Kimble
Rep. Jack Kimble@RepJackKimble·
Just a friendly warning. We don’t even make $200k per year in Congress despite working nearly 140 days. If we aren’t properly compensated, a lot of us will go to the private sector and you will be left with some real idiots in Congress.
English
49.3K
2.5K
29.7K
19.5M
Clay
Clay@clay_phi·
@Jason Someone wants to sell some shares 🫡
English
0
0
2
16
@jason
@jason@Jason·
Uber is going to be bought by Google/Waymo, Amazon or Tesla/SpaceX in the next year. For a “buy it now” price of $250b, one of those three companies gets a $12b a year free cash flow machine with $70b in revenue — and hundreds of millions of global customers This is the most obvious M&A deal since Instagram, Android and YouTube transformed Meta and Google Discuss
English
1.3K
256
6.4K
1.8M
Clay
Clay@clay_phi·
@mattpocockuk Anything downstream of the idea that LLMs need less orchestration is going to be a failure. If you want less orchestration, you have to go upstream and make better models
English
0
0
0
155
Matt Pocock
Matt Pocock@mattpocockuk·
Long skills are such a red flag to me - Hard to audit (and therefore, trust) - Hard to edit (more text, harder to maintain) - Expensive to run (more text, more tokens) The shorter the skill, the better IMO
English
146
51
1.4K
84.5K