
OLAWOLE OLALEKAN MUHEDEEN (Clordman)🇳🇬
5.1K posts

OLAWOLE OLALEKAN MUHEDEEN (Clordman)🇳🇬
@clord7799
Just me and myself trying to push for possibilities.



This is exactly why high-profile corruption cases must be handled with total consistency, not selective drama. Diezani’s lawyer has reportedly questioned the strength of EFCC’s evidence in the London corruption trial and raised a very important point: if there were alleged bribe-givers, why have they not also been charged? That question goes straight to the heart of public trust. Corruption is not a solo performance. If someone is accused of receiving a bribe, then logically, there must be someone accused of offering, arranging, approving, or benefiting from that bribe. So when one person is placed at the centre of the storm while others remain outside the courtroom, Nigerians are right to ask whether justice is being pursued fully or selectively. This does not mean anyone is innocent or guilty. That is for the court to decide. But anti-corruption must never look like a one-sided theatre where some names are exposed and others are protected by silence. If EFCC has strong evidence, let it stand the test of law. If there are alleged bribe-givers, let the public know why they are not facing the same legal pressure. If there are gaps in the case, those gaps must be explained, not hidden behind headlines. Nigeria has suffered too much from corruption for anti-corruption cases to be treated like media spectacles. Citizens need truth, accountability and equal application of the law. Because justice is not complete when only the receiver is chased and the alleged giver walks freely.

























