CLUEZ

Det här måste förevigas

Started a retarded war? Blame Ukraine. Driven up global oil and gas prices? Blame Ukraine. ruSSia helping Iran to kill your troops? Blame Ukraine. Shooting at Shaheds with AD missiles worth 10x the cost of a Shahed? Blame Ukraine. Fuck hegseth. Fuck trump.

EU vill förbjuda innehav av filer till 3d skrivare (och Computer Numerical Cutting [sic] maskiner) som möjliggör tillverkning av vapen och/eller ammo. Som vanligt när allmänheten inte bör fatta vad som händer ska det gå fort. ec.europa.eu/commission/pre…

Japanese news outlets were doing a live translation of the press conference, and when Trump dropped the Pearl Harbor joke the translators were audibly lost for words and paused for a few seconds in disbelief

imagine showing this to someone in 2019

ETC är ett sånt jävla skämt. Ungefär den enda kraftkälla som faktiskt fungerat stabilt och pålitligt i Ukraina har varit kärnkraft.

Trump is, again, lying about shortages of ammunition for the war against Iran due to some imaginary supplies to Ukraine. Here are some facts: The kinds of weapons we are using to strike Iran were NEVER sent to Ukraine: PrSM (entered service in 2024), LUCAS drones (brand new), Tomahawks (Trump talked about sending some, never did), and of course B-2 Spirit stealth bombers, F-22 Raptors, and F-35s -- obviously none were ever transferred to Ukraine. The only weapons one might plausibly refer to would be ATACMS: the entire stock we deigned to send Ukraine was about 50 rounds (we had used 800 in the opening days of the Iraq invasion). The US used over 20 weapons systems to hit over 1,000 targets simultaneously during the opening hours of Operation Epic Fury. An estimated 300 Tomahawks were used and the Pentagon ordered... 57 new ones in the current fiscal year. There have been no deliveries of THAAD interceptors since 2023 and no new orders were placed this year. The military will get 39 in 2027, six years after ordering them. If we are running short on ammunition, it's because the people ordering this war did not plan adequately for contingencies and spent like drunken sailors, not because of our (really nonexistent for the past year) aid to Ukraine. Our big problem is that right now, we are still using extremely expensive systems like Patriots ($3-4 million per missile) and NASAMS/AMRAAM interceptors ($0.8-1.2 million per missile) to combat mass-produced $20,000 Shahed drones. This asymmetric exchange ratio between offense and defense is what kept analysts at night during the Cold War and why eventually defense systems would be scrapped for being too easily overwhelmed by numbers despite being technologically superior. Ukraine has been fighting and innovating precisely to deal with the asymmetric offense capabilities of Russia for years, and they have learned how to do it. But when they offered to help us last year, the Trump administration arrogantly brushed them aside. Now we are squandering premier weapons designed to stop ballistic missiles on cheap drones. And we can't keep doing it no matter how wealthy we are. Missiles take months, sometimes years, to make, while drones can be mass produced in weeks. You lose wars not when the offense peaks --- as the current bombing afficionados at the White House have you believe with their nonstop meming about raining destruction on Iran -- but when your defense capacity is stretched to its limits and cannot cope with things that keep coming at it.

The Prime Minister of Qatar even now suggests that Trump is the pathetic servant of the Russian dictator. "Because everyone knows who the main beneficiary of this war is, and dragging the whole region into this conflict is."

Does America have a limit or is every low just temporary?

Exactly

Det är alltså den här jubelidioten vi ska hjälpa med sitt krig. How bout no

@BarlundCerstin @GammalEn @miss_Grey_76 Hahaha ja, det var en ordvits min bordsgranne kom på i högstadiet. Bra exempel på tyska ord som låter likt svenska men som betyder helt olika saker

@cluez0r @GammalEn @miss_Grey_76 Lejon och björnar? 😅

Vad blir ’vi har vår i luften’ på Tyska? ’Wir haben unser in der luft’?

Europe tried appeasement for 12+ months, it didn’t work. The Trump admin still said Ukraine is not their problem, stopped aid, delays weapons Europe already purchased on behalf of Ukraine, meddles with intelligence sharing, helps Russia (even invited Putin and rolled a red carpet, clapping as he arrived), threatened Denmark with annexation of Greenland, imposed tariffs on Europe, mocked our dead soldiers and disrespected their memory. How do you suggest European leaders justify such aid in front of its citizens, after all that? Also, may I remind you that your president said that the war is already won, they are in the process of winning, they don’t need Europe to help winning but if they don’t help - he threatened dire consequences? Which is it? We all speak English over here, we hear what the administration is saying.

Yes, Europe can't live without a guy who wants to annex its parts, break the EU, wage trade wars against it and lick the ass of Europe's main enemy

De vanligaste argumenten mot ett förbud mot #omskärelse och varför de inte håller:

Boomers in 2030: ok, you were right about Iraq and Iran, and frankly everything in between, but this war with Turkey is really necessary

That edit is fine, but this one of France in the 1970s went sooo much harder. - Concorde - Citroen on a submarine - Citroen launched off of carrier - TGV train racing military cargo plane - Nuclear power plants being built - Nuclear BOMB Banger after Banger after Banger

Modern men grew up alongside women. We went to the same schools, were raised by educated mothers, sisters, and aunts. We shared the same classrooms, the same environments, and the same opportunities. We entered the digital world together…joining platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter at the same time. “No barriers” We built friendships, relationships, and experiences side by side. “Bodily autonomy” We knew women who lived freely, made their own choices, pursued careers, owned homes, and shaped their own lives. In our everyday reality, there was no clear system where we were actively oppressing anyone or taking rights away until social media came. Yet now, we are told to take responsibility for an alleged oppression we never participated in…things that happened generations before us. When we ask when this happened, we’re pointed to the past. But that raises a question: are modern men meant to answer for history they didn’t create? We are not reincarnations of the past, and we don’t carry the actions of previous generations. Accountability should be based on what a person does, not what others did long before they were born. Respect, care, loyalty, and protection should not be automatic or demanded based on history alone. In today’s world, they should be mutual and earned…given through actions, just as they are expected in return. The past should not be used as a tool to extract unearned privileges in the present. History deserves to be understood, but not weaponized. Moral responsibility belongs to those who acted, not to those who merely came after.

@RonFilipkowski “Thank you for starting a war we didn’t want, weren’t talked to about, and is disrupting our economy based on a ‘what if’ and what Trump felt in his bone spurs.” ~ Europe, probably

Trump invades Iran which shoots up oil and gas prices across the globe Meanwhile populists find a way to blame the EU Make it make sense