ColeBeans☕️

86.6K posts

ColeBeans☕️ banner
ColeBeans☕️

ColeBeans☕️

@cole_beans

This The Way. The Truth. 🫶 The Key is to be Generous and fill your soul with Joy.

Washington, DC Katılım Mart 2012
1.8K Takip Edilen743 Takipçiler
ColeBeans☕️
ColeBeans☕️@cole_beans·
Yes indeed
Bob Lonsberry@BobLonsberry

THE POPE IS WRONG The pope is wrong. I'm not talking about the pissing match between him and Trump, an embarrassment arising from two men with problem egos. I'm talking about the gospel. He's wrong about that. On Palm Sunday, presiding at the altar, dressed in his vestments and regalia, standing above the body and blood of Christ, proclaiming as the bishop of Rome the gospel, he said, "Jesus does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war -- but rejects them." Let that sink in. "Jesus does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war -- but rejects them." That is preposterous, and conflicts directly with the Bible, the teachings and history of his own Roman Catholic Church, and the very nature of the Lord Jesus Christ. In the Bible, there are six separates Psalms written as prayers by David while he was waging war. In these prayers he asked God to bless his efforts and defeat his enemies. Does the pope want us to believe that the Lord ignored those prayers and rejected David as he offered them? Should those Psalms be removed from the Bible canonized by his own church four times over more than a thousand years? What about Jehoshaphat, Elisha, Joshua and Hezekiah -- as well as the entire tribes of Reuben, Gad and Manasseh -- who all while waging war prayed fervently to God to deliver them and subdue their enemies? God ignored them, too, and rejected them? That's a little hard to swallow given that each one of them was blessed with success in battle and rejoicingly thanked the Lord for it. That's what the Bible says. As far as the doctrinally authoritative Catechism of the Catholic Church, the church declares the principle of "just war" -- based on the teachings of saints Augustine and Thomas Aquinas -- and Catholic tradition specifically calls on those waging war to ask for victory in justice and protection for Catholic troops. And what of the Catholic chaplains in our Armed Forces? Should they tell young men and women waging war in their country's service that their prayers are pointless, as they will be ignored and rejected by their Savior? Isn't that what the Holy Father said? Finally, there is the matter of Constantine as he prepared for the Battle of the Milvian Bridge. A pagan who was about to wage war, he asked God to bless him with victory. At that point, he saw a cross in the sky and words that told him to march under its banner. That led to his conversion, the embrace of Christianity by the Roman Empire, the Nicaean Creed, and the official governmental sponsorship that made the Catholic Church one of the most powerful and wealthy institutions in the western world. Is the pope saying that the Lord turned a deaf ear to Constantine? Was that all a mistake or misunderstanding? Should we still be worshipping the sun god? Of course not. But this isn't about history or doctrine, soldiers or even the Bible. It's about Jesus Christ. "Jesus does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war -- but rejects them." Nothing could be further from the truth. Jesus listens to everyone's prayers, and Jesus rejects no one. The Lord loves us all, no matter who we are, no matter what we have done, no matter how far we have fallen. God loves us all, and waits like the adoring Heavenly Father he is for us to reach out to him. He rejoices when we pray, he embraces us when we pray, he pours out his blessings upon us when we pray. Even if we are waging war. Even if we are in the depths of sin. Maybe especially if we are in the depths of sin. "The Lord is near to all who call upon him," David said. And that is true, no matter what Leo said. God always loves us, God is always there for us, God will always hear our prayers. It's unfortunate the vicar of Christ seems confused on that point.

English
0
0
0
3
ColeBeans☕️ retweetledi
Bryan Johnson
Bryan Johnson@bryan_johnson·
Most people might miss the biggest benefit of sauna You need to get really really hot… Your core body temperature needs to hit 102.4°F (39°C). For reference, a fever is anything above 100.4°F (38°C) So I swallowed a temperature monitoring pill. It goes through your digestive tract and precisely measures your internal temperature every 30 seconds. When your core body temperature hits the goal of 102°F, your body releases these proteins (heat shock proteins - HSPs) that clean up your body’s debris. I was curious what time my body hits this goal because up until now, I’ve been doing 20 mins of 200°F dry sauna. … it turns out it takes 31 minutes It feels like you’re dying. I didn't expert such pain and panic. Before this experiment, I did over 200 sauna sessions at 200°F for 20 min. This means I likely never achieved the heat shock protein (HSP) threshold at 102.4°F (39°C), which deprived me of so much sauna-health goodness. If your sauna doesn’t heat up to temperatures allowing your core temperature to reach 102.4°F (39°C) or you struggle to tolerate heat, do not be discouraged. The dry sessions I did at 200°F (93°C) for 20 min still showed incredibly health benefits. My previous 20 min sessions still showed: 1) 10+ yr reduction of my vascular age 2) 87% reduction of microplastics 3) detox of environmental toxins 4) fertility marker improvement Will report back once I have results on this new protocol…
Bryan Johnson tweet media
English
415
204
4.5K
555.9K
ColeBeans☕️ retweetledi
ColeBeans☕️ retweetledi
John Carter
John Carter@martianwyrdlord·
Women have never been freer, more prosperous, or more independent, they've never been safer, they've never enjoyed more support and validation, they've never had more power and opportunity, and they are absolutely furious about all of it.
The New Statesman@NewStatesman

ANGRY YOUNG WOMEN by @emilylawford and @Scarlett__Mag It was a Wednesday night and seven members of the University of Leeds’ feminist society had invited me to join their book swap. I asked how they felt about the young men they knew. “I don’t care for them,” said a girl called Ruby imperiously. “They’re not bad people, but they refuse to call out their friends who make other girls uncomfortable. They’ll laugh at jokes that are sexist, racist, homophobic, they don’t care about political issues… I don’t think they like women a lot.” If a man is attracted to you, she said, he might talk about things like toxic misogyny. If he doesn’t fancy you, he won’t bother. “I feel like a lot of it is quite sexually motivated with men.” I asked if they’d consider dating a man with different political views. They all immediately said no. “I don’t think I’d even be friends with one,” said one girl. “They don’t see you as human.” Only one woman, Evelyn, admitted to having male friends (though she was worried this made her a “pick me”, trying too hard for male attention). Evelyn was concerned about what the men she knew were watching online. “The stuff that’s being said about women is crazy,” she said. “They’re getting all these reels, talking about, like, bad stuff about women. And I get reels of women saying bad stuff about men. I try to think, not all men are like this, but…” On the internet, women and men have never been more alienated from each other. While the toxic, often hard-right politics of the manosphere have been exhaustively documented, the new generation of female influencers are nearly as extreme – just on the other side of the political spectrum. The “femosphere” spans a range of tones: there are misandrist dating coaches who urge women to reject men altogether, and more explicitly progressive content creators who cover global and domestic politics. Exclusive polling by Merlin Strategy for the New Statesman reveals that young women, aged between 18 and 30, are by far the most progressive demographic in the UK. Young women are 26 percentage points less likely to feel positively about capitalism than young men, and much less likely to feel the economy works in their favour. Gen Z women are more likely to support causes such as feminism, environmentalism and anti-racism than young men. They also feel much more negatively towards young men than young men feel about them. I spent the last few months in search of the new left-wing young women. It wasn’t difficult – they were everywhere. But it all felt impossibly bleak. They weren’t excited about their futures. They didn’t like the men they knew, or the idea of those they didn’t. Men were just a threat who had the potential to harm or trap them. This will almost certainly make relationships harder: fewer than half of young women feel men understand them. Young women are much less likely than men to date people who disagree with their politics. People will get lonelier, and angrier. Young women are twice as likely to not want children as young men. And it’s getting worse. Women under 25 are most likely to believe things are “stacked against me, no matter how hard I try”. A significant majority of young women feel isolated from the rest of the country. The two main political parties aren’t reaching out to them specifically. Many women told me they feared a Reform government pressuring them to have babies. Many say they will vote for the Greens in the upcoming local elections, but few seem to believe that will make a difference. They don’t feel represented by mainstream politics, and they don’t think anyone cares. Cover art by Carl Godfrey

English
191
757
7.8K
205.5K
ColeBeans☕️ retweetledi
Toby Cunningham
Toby Cunningham@sircryptotips·
Bayer has just SUED Pfizer, BioNTech, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson in federal court. Because the mRNA stabilisation technology used in every single COVID vaccine injected into your kids, your parents, your pregnant friends, your grandmother in the care home was patented by Monsanto in the 1980s for CROPS. And the company that owns the patent is now in court demanding royalties. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is Bayer's own lawyers, in Bayer's own filings, on the public record. They are literally arguing in federal court that their agricultural genetic modification technology was copied and injected into human beings WITHOUT A LICENSE. Meanwhile Moderna just paid Roivant $2.25 BILLION to settle a separate mRNA patent lawsuit. BioNTech is suing Moderna. GSK is suing Moderna. Everyone is suing everyone. The patent fights alone are going to cost these companies tens of billions of dollars. If Bayer is right, then every single "safety study" that was rushed through in 2020 was looking at the wrong thing. They were testing a vaccine. They were not testing an agricultural genetic modification platform being used in humans for the first time. I have been saying this since 2021. The same institutions that LIED to you about Iraq having WMDs, about the 2008 bailouts being a "one time thing", about inflation being transitory, about Epstein killing himself, those are the SAME institutions that told you to take a shot based on two months of trial data. If you still trust them after THIS one, I genuinely do not know what to tell you. Wake up. Get healthy. Get off their food. Get off their media. Get off their system.
Toby Cunningham tweet media
English
573
9K
16.1K
489.1K
ColeBeans☕️
ColeBeans☕️@cole_beans·
@NBA__Courtside Valid critique, if they suspend him after the game is finished, however due to the league office and referees being corrupt as can be they simply didn’t have the courage to even do that much.
English
0
0
0
24
NBA Courtside
NBA Courtside@NBA__Courtside·
Stephen A Smith says the refs made the right call not ejecting LaMelo Ball due to his stardom in last nights game: “If you have a playoff birth on the line, you got a star like LaMelo Ball, you certainly don’t want to eject somebody in the 2nd quarter and make that kind of decision because then some of us would’ve been complaining about how the officials interfered with the outcome of the game”
NBA Courtside@NBA__Courtside

Brian Windhorst says LaMelo Ball could’ve been Ejected last night for injuring Bam Adebayo: “I know Heat fans are screaming he should’ve been ejected. Because Bam was injured on the play that badly, they could have ejected him. Calling this a flagrant 2 wouldn’t have been egregious. Some people are wondering if he’ll be suspended for Fridays game” (Via @FirstTake)

English
83
5
98
62.7K
ColeBeans☕️
ColeBeans☕️@cole_beans·
@PolymarketSport ZERO . Yeah that’s correct, $0.00. Meanwhile multi billions 🤑 in profit, while ZERO going to supporting transportation for the event. Americans, This is a PSA ‼️ We are being robbed in broad daylight. ☀️🌞
English
0
0
0
1.1K
Polymarket Sports
Polymarket Sports@PolymarketSport·
🚨BREAKING: New Jersey’s Governor defended raising train ticket prices from $12 to $100 during World Cup: "FIFA is providing $0 for transportation and they are making $11 BILLION from the World Cup. FIFA should pay, not my taxpayers."
Polymarket Sports tweet mediaPolymarket Sports tweet media
English
41
31
813
52.9K
ColeBeans☕️
ColeBeans☕️@cole_beans·
I wish I had money to buy stocks right now $VOO
English
1
0
1
43
ColeBeans☕️
ColeBeans☕️@cole_beans·
@ShamsCharania Of course. Because it’s all about the money with this corrupt ass league 🤦‍♂️ unbelievable. Incredible how the NBA league office couldn’t pass the test in literally the first playoff game of the year. Huge black eye for the league. This does not set a good precedent.
English
1
0
3
508
Shams Charania
Shams Charania@ShamsCharania·
The NBA is fining Charlotte's LaMelo Ball $35,000 for his trip of Miami's Bam Adebayo and upgrading the action to a Flagrant, plus fining him $25,000 for cursing postgame, sources tell ESPN. $60K in fines, Flagrant. No suspension.
Shams Charania tweet media
English
1.8K
2.5K
31.2K
3.9M
ColeBeans☕️ retweetledi
Anish Moonka
Anish Moonka@anishmoonka·
Your brain can't tell the difference between someone criticizing you out loud and you criticizing yourself in your own head. Same brain regions fire. Same stress chemicals release. As far as your nervous system is concerned, your inner voice is a real person in the room. Psychologist Alain Morin put people in brain scanners back in 2007 and watched what happened when they talked to themselves silently. The speech and sound-processing areas of the brain lit up, the exact same ones that activate during a real conversation with another person. Your brain is both the speaker and the listener, and it takes both roles seriously. Your inner voice runs at about 4,000 words per minute. If you tried to say all of it out loud, it would take over 15 minutes. Your brain is holding full arguments with itself while you stand in line for coffee. When that voice is encouraging ("I can figure this out"), it wakes up the part of your brain that plans ahead and stays calm, and triggers dopamine, the same feel-good chemical you get from eating something you love. When the voice turns harsh ("I always mess this up"), your brain flips to threat mode and floods your system with cortisol, the stress hormone your body normally saves for real danger. One study in Scientific Reports tracked people's daily inner thoughts and found that negative, past-focused thinking raised stress hormone levels even when nothing bad was happening around them. Just the words in their head were enough to put the body on alert. Ethan Kross at the University of Michigan found one easy fix. When people referred to themselves by name ("What should Sarah do here?") instead of saying "I," the self-focused part of their brain quieted down within one second. No extra mental effort. His team published the finding in Scientific Reports in 2017, and it worked whether people were looking at upsetting images or replaying painful memories. One pronoun swap changed how the brain processed the emotion. Your brain also physically reshapes itself around these patterns. Brain scans have picked up visible structural changes after just six weeks of consistently shifting how people talk to themselves. Neurons that fire together wire together. Researchers at Queen's University estimated in 2020 that the brain produces about 6,200 separate thoughts per day. The words you wrap around those thoughts are deciding which circuits grow stronger and which ones quietly fade, thousands of times before you go to sleep tonight.
For all Curious@fascinatingonX

🚨BREAKING: Science confirms that brain cells are influenced by our self-talk.

English
27
1K
5.8K
259.9K