Elle

105 posts

Elle banner
Elle

Elle

@collahome

Data Scientist with a background in commercial construction management. Let's connect https://t.co/0BxPuHr0oA

United States Katılım Şubat 2024
112 Takip Edilen30 Takipçiler
Elle
Elle@collahome·
How do I remove politics off my timeline? I made a mistake 2 weeks ago, and now it's all I see
English
0
0
0
9
Elle
Elle@collahome·
@NoahPollak This was predictable as soon as she said "but the under 30s hate..." She's trying to capture an audience that will be impossible to please because the second she doesn't blame their favorite villain, she'll be accused "You got the call". What an undignified way to make a living
English
0
0
2
36
Elle
Elle@collahome·
@realmikolson @ConceptualJames @DSterling1948 @NewDiscourses Just look at a recent thread where they all give reasons of how they became Jew-haters while patting themselves on the back. No logic to be found. My favorite one was: x.com/Naternot9/stat…
Naternot🌲@Naternot9

@LaurenWitzkeDE I used to argue with antisemitic anime avatars on Twitter who mocked me for supporting Israel. Then I heard Ben Shapiro say that Pat Buchanan was an antisemite who should be blacklisted. That's when I knew the antisemites were right. I voted for Buchanan in '96. I met you btw.

English
1
0
1
30
Mikale Olson
Mikale Olson@realmikolson·
Exactly Or what I get a lot is this: they’ll like or share anti Jew stuff to their Instagram stories and then in personal conversations they’ll deny harboring racist sentiments towards Jews. Or at best, they’ll say they’re only criticizing these Israeli government, which I find to be rare these days (it’s usually much more than that)
English
1
0
13
219
Mikale Olson
Mikale Olson@realmikolson·
What’s the best way to warn/confront friends who are slipping into Jew-hated (and probably don’t fully realize what they’re buying in to)?
English
81
7
181
9K
Elle
Elle@collahome·
@Naternot9 @LaurenWitzkeDE The antisemites were right because a random Jew had an opinion you didn't like? Reminds me of this, written in 1946 by a non-Jewish philosopher
Elle tweet media
English
0
0
0
27
Naternot🌲
Naternot🌲@Naternot9·
@LaurenWitzkeDE I used to argue with antisemitic anime avatars on Twitter who mocked me for supporting Israel. Then I heard Ben Shapiro say that Pat Buchanan was an antisemite who should be blacklisted. That's when I knew the antisemites were right. I voted for Buchanan in '96. I met you btw.
English
1
0
1
846
Lauren Witzke
Lauren Witzke@LaurenWitzkeDE·
I used to be a hardcore Christian Zionist. My “great awakening” moment was when I saw someone say “Google the dancing Israelis” during the first Groyper war at a college event in Iowa with Charlie Kirk. Out of mere curiosity, I googled it, which lead me to do more and more research, and was horrified by what I found. What was your “great awakening” moment?
English
1K
1.3K
8.8K
1M
Elle
Elle@collahome·
@nosoup4knowles @crb0712 Megyn is being myopic. When Fuentes debunked the conspiracy.. his followers freaked out & said "he got the call". He kept having to reiterate his bona fides. Having an audience that needs a steady diet of "Israel did it" narratives is exhausting to anyone with an objective mind
English
0
0
0
8
Britta | NoSoup4Knowles
Britta | NoSoup4Knowles@nosoup4knowles·
@crb0712 I thought Megyn's stance on Israel was perfectly reasonable. There's nothing wrong with being critical. But attacking longtime fans just for questioning her on her reluctance to challenge certain narratives is wild.
English
2
0
3
149
Britta | NoSoup4Knowles
Britta | NoSoup4Knowles@nosoup4knowles·
If Megyn Kelly continues to praise people like Tucker or Candace without pushing back on their narratives, she cannot expect to continue being taken seriously by folks on the right. In her words... "you're losing me. It's time to wrap it up"
English
293
118
1.5K
42K
Elle
Elle@collahome·
She's making a calculated decision based on viewership, but that's a slippery slope. The reason Owens & Carlson need to constantly up the ante is precisely because that type of audience is NOT an audience you want to have. When pundits and podcasters like this deviate, their audience then attacks them and accuses them of being Mossad or a fed. While the algorithm rewards this type of punditry with high engagement, the audience is very fickle and needs constant red meat to feed its enormous appetite for "Israel did it" stories. Her audience is currently a healthy mix of people with diverse viewpoints. Alienating reasonable people would be a pretty shortsighted decision.
English
0
0
0
13
Elle
Elle@collahome·
I know Megyn is probably not going to see my comment, but I would challenge her to really rethink this. She's essentially betting on the wrong horse; she's making a calculated decision based on viewership, but that's a slippery slope. The reason Owens & Carlson need to constantly up the ante is precisely because that type of an audience is NOT an audience you want to have. They only want one narrative (& chosen scapegoat) and when their pundit deviates, their audience then attacks them and accuses them of being Mossad or a fed. The pressure then builds on the pundit to repeatedly deliver this kind of narrative. This eats away at someone on the long term if they have any semblance of a conscience. While the algorithm rewards this type of punditry with high engagement, the audience is very fickle and needs constant red meat to feed its enormous appetite for "Israel did it" stories. Her audience is currently a healthy mix of people with diverse viewpoints. Alienating reasonable people would be a pretty shortsighted decision.
English
0
0
1
12
Megyn Kelly
Megyn Kelly@megynkelly·
Look at this. No, I have no obligation to “separate” myself from anyone. I run my own media company and my own show. That show is where I express my own opinions and I will decide what/what not to opine on. If you need me to condemn Candace or Tucker for their opinions in order to listen to me, then I may not be for you. He’s a close friend and she is under enough pressure w/o gratuitous shots from me. My fight is with the left, not these two.
Florida Dad@FLDadReborn

@megynkelly If you can’t separate yourself from Candace Owens, many of us are going to separate ourselves from you. We do NOT have to align with everyone that claims to be “of the right” when their motives and history are as shady as hers.

English
4K
3.1K
33.3K
3.7M
Elle
Elle@collahome·
@JustTheTweets17 You guys spread propaganda, bear false witness, scapegoat, and don't believe the people who were actually there who deny these claims, including Charlie's manager and Charlie's pastor... but you act like a victim when people post a laughing meme? This is sad
English
0
0
0
8
Elle
Elle@collahome·
@_iamblakeley @LauraLoomer Laura is not pushing any narrative, she's asking people to stop harassing TPUSA staff. What is there to make up? Meanwhile multiple people close to Charlie have debunked all your side's claims; his pastor, his manager, and at least 4 people who were at the event.
English
0
0
1
80
Laura Loomer
Laura Loomer@LauraLoomer·
I’m not going to say who because they asked me not to, but a high level TPUSA official told me in an emotional phone call that TPUSA has asked those who are pushing the lie that Israel killed Charlie Kirk to stop, and they won’t stop. As a result, the Jew obsessed lunatics online have been sending harassing and threatening messages to TPUSA staffers and employees and now they have had to get even more security because staff are worried some jew obsessed lunatic is going to show up and do something violent. TPUSA staff want people to stop talking about this insane conspiracy theory that nobody has provided any evidence for. I’m told by my friend that staff are very upset by these lies and it’s creating a workplace unsafe environment and emotional distractions. It’s so deranged and evil. Israel didn’t kill Charlie Kirk. A Leftist with a Trans boyfriend murdered Charlie because he consumed too much leftist media and was brainwashed into thinking Charlie Kirk was a hateful person. He confessed to murdering Charlie. He confessed in texts to engraving the bullets. To lie and say Israel killed Charlie is beyond the pale. If you are that insane, then you are just as crazy as Tyler Robinson in my eyes.
English
4.5K
4.7K
21.9K
1.2M
Elle
Elle@collahome·
@Funsnotfun @LaurenWitzkeDE Did you expect someone who peddles this kind of stuff to understand how corporate finance works? Daily Wire is valued at 1 Billion dollars lmao
English
0
0
0
15
Lauren Witzke
Lauren Witzke@LaurenWitzkeDE·
IT’S A SET UP! Ben Shapiro's Daily Wire "donates" $1M to TPUSA to help "bring people back to Christ, and bring people back to church, and back to biblical values," as Charlie wanted. This sounds good, but the truth is, this is money spent to enforce Christian Zionism and loyalty to Israeli interests. I don’t care what you say— anyone who gives an organization $1 Million dollars becomes an influential part of the organization. Also, it’s very strange that the Daily Wire was able to cough up $1 million dollars to give to TPUSA, when they themselves were shutting down departments, and laying off people just a couple months ago due to "financial challenges". WHERE did this $1 Million dollars REALLY come from?
English
2.7K
6K
33.6K
3M
Elle
Elle@collahome·
There's two ways to read this objectively. 1. Yes, many people in hyper leftist academic spaces talk like this.. many of which are on the spectrum. 2. He could have written this specifically to clarify that his trans partner is innocent I'm leaning towards 2. The feds definitely didn't write this, they go undercover all the time and know exactly how to get into character
English
0
0
1
13
HustleBitch
HustleBitch@HustleBitch_·
IS THIS IT? Is this officially the DUMBEST thing the U.S. government has ever tried to force the American people to believe?
HustleBitch tweet media
English
3.6K
6.6K
53.6K
3.1M
Elle
Elle@collahome·
I don't believe in religion, but the Talmud is a tome of legal debates.. each page has many different arguments from many different figures, openly contradicting the other one. There's even jokes in there. It's 2,700+ pages of arguments from over 1000 rabbis. You can't "condemn" the Talmud. It's not scripture, it's basically a "masterclass" in how to think about law. The Talmud had a big influence in how our own legal system works
English
1
0
0
18
Abstracメ
Abstracメ@abstractmacro·
Sure thing. The Jewish community first needs to condemn the Talmud, call for the removal of the current Israeli government, call for AIPAC to register as foreign agent, stop pushing distorted gender ideologies and recognize that non Jewish humans are not beneath you. After that, maybe he’ll have a convo. -I could be wrong
English
2
0
6
464
Nicholas J. Fuentes
Nicholas J. Fuentes@NickJFuentes·
We don’t know the whole story about Charlie Kirk’s assassin yet and the official story has some inconsistencies. We do know that tens of thousands of Leftists celebrated his public execution for expressing basic conservative opinions. They must be held accountable regardless.
English
2.3K
4.2K
62.2K
1.7M
Elle
Elle@collahome·
@NaiKaroYar @EYakoby @RealCandaceO They did not confirm what you said. They all said that Israel was not even remotely the center of the conversation, and that even when it was discussed, it was done in an exercise to hone debate skills, which was Charlie's idea. Calling that "treason" is demented.
English
0
0
15
335
Irfan
Irfan@NaiKaroYar·
@EYakoby Actually all of the names mentioned confirmed one thing that there was a meeting took place in Hamptons NY to lobby for a foreign country Israel, no one debunked anything @RealCandaceO said, these people should be tried for treason.
English
18
12
371
16.6K
Eyal Yakoby
Eyal Yakoby@EYakoby·
So far: - Charlie’s pastor, Charlie’s team, Charlie’s executive producer - Bill Ackman - Seth Dhillon - Josh Hammer - Xaviaer DuRousseau Have all debunked Candace’s story. Candace’s source? An Iranian funded magazine.
English
687
1.8K
13.9K
462.7K
Josh Hammer
Josh Hammer@josh_hammer·
Extremely well said by my good friend Seth. Please read in full. I will always fondly recall this Hamptons retreat as the last time I saw Charlie in-person. I inscribed a copy of my book and gave it to him. He was grateful and said he looked forward to reading it. (He reiterated this gratitude on our Zoom call less than 24 hours before last week's tragedy.) The Hamptons retreat was full of robust, lively discussions and general camaraderie. Charlie, as he always did, hosted a great event. Those charlatans now seeking to exploit this event for their own nefarious ends—while desecrating Charlie's memory in the process—are acting in nothing less than demonic fashion.
Seth Dillon@SethDillon

On July 8th, I got a text from Charlie Kirk inviting me to an "influencer retreat." The theme was, "Save the West." I told him I was available and would see him there. Very little information was provided. But it was a Turning Point event spearheaded by Charlie, so I assumed (correctly) that there would be some good people and a great program. The retreat took place in the Hamptons on August 4th and 5th. At least 30 people attended. I only knew a handful of them personally. An itinerary was provided when we arrived. There were meals and themed sessions covering topics like American identity, immigration, economics, and foreign policy. Charlie stood at the front of the room. He would speak a little, then open the floor for discussion. He drove the discussion with challenging questions and there was spirited debate. If there were private meetings that took place, I wasn’t in them. If there were angry confrontations, threats, or coercion, I didn’t witness or hear about any of it. Should evidence of such things come to light, it will be news to me. One concern Charlie raised, which I believe he also raised publicly, was about free speech. He felt that criticism of Israel was so discouraged, so penalized, that we aren’t really free to voice it. Some in the room agreed with him. I argued that while it can come at a cost in certain contexts, it also pays pretty handsomely in others. There are people who have generated massive audiences and engagement by doing little other than criticizing Israel and Jews. I pointed out that in my case, it was criticizing the critics that had come at a high cost. Prominent figures on the Right now have me in their crosshairs as an enemy who must be destroyed. That I’m in a position where I feel the need to write this post and clear my name of any wrongdoing is only further evidence of this. After the retreat, I sent Charlie a text to let him know it meant a lot that he had wanted me there. He replied, “Of course. I’m here for you.” I responded, “Same.” He then shared a verse from Scripture that has been on my mind ever since his senseless murder: “God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble.” – Psalm 46:1 I did not organize or participate in an "intervention" with Charlie. I was there at his personal request. I did not coerce him, or threaten him, or pressure him, or witness anyone else do any of these things. We spent two days hearing from our friend — both his concerns and his wisdom — and he took time to listen to, and encourage, each of us. He welcomed our feedback and debate; that’s why we were there. I also didn’t place any calls to try and stop anything from being published or publicized. On the contrary, Charlie’s team reached out to me yesterday and told me not to respond to any inquiries about the retreat because they were being made in bad faith. They said, “These people have no good intentions during a time while we mourn our friend.” They also apologized to me that I was being dragged into this, and said that they were doing what they could to put false rumors and allegations to rest. I thanked them and told them I was sorry they were having to deal with it, too. I’m sick with grief over the loss of my friend. And that sadness is compounded by the fact that instead of honoring Charlie and his legacy, his name is being exploited to generate controversy, confusion, and conspiracies. My heart breaks for everyone involved whose integrity and affection for Charlie are being called into question. I’m sure there will be responses to this that accuse me of dishonesty. I note in advance that they’ll be coming from notoriously dishonest people. I’ve also attached screenshots of correspondence with Charlie and his team to support what I’ve said here. The fact that any of this is necessary is a disgrace.

English
170
260
2.2K
374K
Elle retweetledi
AG
AG@AGHamilton29·
Just to be clear what happened here: Far-left pro-terror propagandists (Grayzone) who hated Charlie Kirk invented a narrative about an event at the Hamptons to lie about him, push falsehoods about his views, and encourage a conspiracy about who killed him. Candace Owens sided with those propagandists and tried to exploit his death to do the same. Multiple people at the event, Charlie’s team, and his close friends have had to pause their mourning to publicly dispute these lies. His pastor has had to come out to publicly admonish Candace Owens directly for how she is exploiting his death. I realize it’s hard for people to sometimes be able to tell what is happening. But if you can’t figure out who is lying and the character of those people in this case, then you need to seriously re-evaluate your connection to reality. There are truly awful people in the world. Some have used the last few days to celebrate the murder of a young father and husband with political opinions they didn’t like. Others have used that same murder to push their personal agenda of hate and conspiracies. I would argue the latter are even worse than the former. Don’t forget who they are or what they did.
English
132
614
3.4K
199.9K
Elle
Elle@collahome·
-Asking someone for proof for a made up claim is not rational, it's emotional. It's common for Cluster Bs. And their reason for lying is content (engagement) and control. -The person putting forth the claim must provide the receipts. -Second, receipts never work on people who make baseless claims and incite suspicion, they give ammunition for more claims of "coverup". Anyone who has had experience with Cluster Bs can attest to this vicious cycle.
English
1
0
0
11
Stacy Grawunder
Stacy Grawunder@GrawunderStacy·
@collahome @LBLadvocate @josh_hammer Because they'd have absolutely NO reason to lie... There's receipts (not long overly worded alibi tweets) that can easily be produced that would shut her down. Why not just do that?
English
1
0
0
15
Elle
Elle@collahome·
As much as it conflicts with my spiritual belief that everyone is inherently worthy, has a purpose in the divine plan, and that we must show grace.. When I see posts like this, I can't help but find myself questioning why stupid people like this exist. I can deal with smart evil, but stupid evil is different.
English
0
0
1
47
Patrick Casey
Patrick Casey@restoreorderusa·
The irony here is that this attempt to characterize a crackdown on the left as a “divide and concur” strategy is itself an op to divide the right by using Jews/Israel as an intrafactional wedge issue.
Dan Bilzerian@DanBilzerian

Jews are trying so desperately to divide us, make this right against the left, black vs white, anything to deflect from who is actually at the root of our problems. This is text book divide and concur. We don’t need palantir and more doxing, we need to stop Jewish supremacy.

English
24
57
760
32.1K
Elle
Elle@collahome·
@CourtPress19 @ncole_r @DanBilzerian The lesser of two evils is the one that has committed 66,872 terror attacks in the past 45 years and killed 1 million Christians each year in the middle east? That's awfully strange. There don't seem to be any stats or facts to back up your assessment
English
1
0
2
15
Courtney
Courtney@CourtPress19·
As a follower of Christ, what I have come to know is at least Muslims saw Christ in a high regard as a protect. In regards to Jews, they hate Christ and completely discredit his motives and the resurrection. They specifically leave out the teaching from the Book of Daniel and the Talmud specifically says to kill Christians. The lesser of two evils 🤷‍♀️ but the Jewish state is quite literally the church of satan.
English
2
0
1
67
Dan Bilzerian
Dan Bilzerian@DanBilzerian·
Jews are trying so desperately to divide us, make this right against the left, black vs white, anything to deflect from who is actually at the root of our problems. This is text book divide and concur. We don’t need palantir and more doxing, we need to stop Jewish supremacy.
English
2.1K
10K
66.7K
1.8M
Elle
Elle@collahome·
@LBLadvocate @josh_hammer So multiple people who were actually there are reiterating the same thing, but you choose to believe they are all lying and scheming. Why? Does that feel good to you?
English
2
0
0
17
Lauren J
Lauren J@LBLadvocate·
@josh_hammer I’m shocked that you agree with Seth Dillon about this meeting in the Hamptons. 🤡
English
2
0
1
152
Elle
Elle@collahome·
I noticed something very unnerving about the way they "argue". They make a claim with no evidence, just hunches and suspicions. They act innocent "I'm just asking questions", "I care about X (while clearly devoid of genuine emotion). Someone responds with a factual and irrefutable rebuttal, and then they say something akin to "your time is up. everyone knows. nobody believes you". This is clearly an attempt to alienate, exert power, and undermine the sense of safety of "the Jew". It's also an attempt to shame without guilt, to make someone feel stained or implicated in something. Also an attempt to show them "resistance is futile" and break them down spiritually and emotionally. There's a lot of Machiavellianism. They are threatened by Jewish power in a spiritual way, because even when the facts don't support their narrative of nefarious plots, they still on some level recognize the spiritual power/protection. And that is what they are trying to destroy.
English
0
0
0
13
Arynne Wexler
Arynne Wexler@ArynneWexler·
I shared this old Jewish saying with Charlie last month at a group breakfast: “The antisemite does not accuse the Jew of stealing because he thinks he stole something. He does it because he enjoys watching the Jew turn out his pockets to prove his innocence.”
English
665
289
2.5K
480.6K