collin ahrens

Applications close 30 June 2022 for these great #phdpositions

@JesseThorn This is the best of the best.

@JBYoder A personal favourite is the black metal band called botanist.

@RobLanfear Papers/readcube. I haven't used the collab feature because they all need to be users. Costs $$ too. But should work on theory.

@gbaucom Really good to know. I was just hemming and hawwing about which way to submit my edits. I chose poorly apparently.

Some colleagues and I have just published a fun paper exploring plasticity to repeated heatwaves under different temperatures. FFO thermal tolerance and safety margins. @DNAprymer @AndyPlantLady @anthea_challis @AdrienneNicotra @Margare77278174 nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.111…

@ChadPecot I'm stressed just looking at this. The whole figure caption is red.

A mentor’s love for their trainees can be measured in tracked changes

@DNAprymer @DeanNicolle1 @AnneCecileCln @through_not_to @b_medlyn @DrChoat Awesome! Super excited.

Processing the last batch of 620 eucalyptus trees sampled from Currency Creek Arboretum @DeanNicolle1 linking drought response to climate-origin, life-history and functional traits for NSW #SavingOurSpecies program

@DNAprymer @JtdFinch @_LisaMCox That photo! Your solo album will be released soon. In all seriousness, good info on how faux conservation works in Sydney.

@JtdFinch Trying to do my bit to put in conservation measures for the unique and precious natural ecosystems in Western Sydney - this article by @_LisaMCox highlights how flawed the system actually is

'Development should stop': serious flaws in offsets plan for new western Sydney airport - featuring the one and only ⁦@DNAprymer⁩ theguardian.com/environment/20…

@RebeccaCJordan @_PAHarrison @jasongbragg @DNAprymer @kdmurray91 @RoseLAndrew @jwwhale + those not on twitter (I don't think) Helen Bothwell, Margaret Byrne, Dot Steane, and Tara Hopley.

I'm pretty terrible at sharing the research I've been involved with on here, but some great colleagues and I have spent time testing the effects of different filtering parameters on GEA results. Revealing some pretty interesting results. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.111…

@RebeccaCJordan @WomenScienceDay @ScienceAU Super excited to see the results!

Today, on @WomenScienceDay, I am analysing gigabytes of genomic data from these beauties; to understand how resilient trees may be environmental change. #SuperstarsofSTEM #science4all #February11 @ScienceAU

@aaron__stern @leo_speidel @ras_nielsen Well this is cool. Thanks for sharing.

@alpapan @jwwhale Multiple testing is controlled for in the GEAs, each GEA has their own form of p-value corrections. GDMs are generally for postdoc analysis.

@ecolology asked a question re: GDMs but we ran out of time in the Q&A session. I'll try to not be too technical - but I'll probably FAIL!!. Q: Why are GDMs better than other spatial models, and which data types are used? 1/n

@_erikaroper Great pic! Love those little beasts, even if the first question an expert asks for ID purposes is "where did you collect it?"

Our local expert and author of the orchid field guide IDed it as a Diuris dendrobioides. twitter.com/_erikaroper/st…

Any orchid (Diuris) experts on here that can take a squiz at some photos?

@jrossibarra @apragsdale @Grey_Monroe Brilliant! Thanks for sharing and to all of the people adding to this resource.

A regular (albeit late-night) reminder that you can find lots of successful job applications here. github.com/RILAB/statemen… Please contribute if you've just gotten a job -- whether academic research, industry, or PUI! Thanks to @apragsdale and @Grey_Monroe for recent additions.

@PyhaTanja Can I get an add? Many thanks. 🤘 @DNAprymer @jwwhale

@aimeejschulz @DNAprymer what are the chances we can get one of these?

Fieldwork is a whole lot more fun when a phenotyping robot is involved. This little guy makes it so that I can collect data on the 8,000+ plants in my field experiment in under half an hour!

@DrBreaky Great summary for responding to reviewers.

How to revise: As an editor and author I have seen many revised papers return to journals. Given effort, most go well (ie step toward acceptance). Some go pear-shaped. I’ve slowly improved and have an approach known by my group as the ‘Breakspear method”. Here is its essence